Cited by 37Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureDNA and Biological Computing

Algorithm for DNA sequence assembly by quantum annealing

Open access
Nałęcz-Charkiewicz, Katarzyna, Nowak, Robert M.·2022·BMC Bioinformatics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The assembly task is an indispensable step in sequencing genomes of new organisms and studying structural genomic changes. In recent years, the dynamic development of next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods raises hopes for making whole-genome sequencing a fast and reliable tool used, for example, in medical diagnostics. However, this is hampered by the slowness and computational requirements of the current processing algorithms, which raises the need to develop more efficient algorithms. One possible approach, still little explored, is the use of quantum computing. RESULTS: We present a proof of concept of de novo assembly algorithm, using the Genomic Signal Processing approach, detecting overlaps between DNA reads by calculating the Pearson correlation coefficient and formulating the assembly problem as an optimization task (Traveling Salesman Problem). Computations performed on a classic computer were compared with the results achieved by a hybrid method combining CPU and QPU calculations. For this purpose quantum annealer by D-Wave was used. The experiments were performed with artificially generated data and DNA reads coming from a simulator, with actual organism genomes used as input sequences. To our knowledge, this work is one of the few where actual sequences of organisms were used to study the de novo assembly task on quantum annealer. CONCLUSIONS: Proof of concept carried out by us showed that the use of quantum annealer (QA) for the de novo assembly task might be a promising alternative to the computations performed in the classical model. The current computing power of the available devices requires a hybrid approach (combining CPU and QPU computations). The next step may be developing a hybrid algorithm strictly dedicated to the de novo assembly task, using its specificity (e.g. the sparsity and bounded degree of the overlap-layout-consensus graph).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12859-022-04661-7

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In two approaches proposed by Boev et al. [143] and Nałęcz-Charkiewicz and Nowak [144], the OLC graph is obtained with classical computations and mapped into a Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) problem.

    “In two approaches proposed by Boev et al. [143] and Nałęcz-Charkiewicz and Nowak [144], OLC graph is obtained with classical computations and mapped into a Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) problem.”
  • The number of required qubits scales as the square of the number of reads.

    “The number of required qubits scales as the square of the number of reads and this strongly limits its applicability to large use cases, even when procedures to efficiently decompose the problem into subtasks are applied [144].”
  • The scaling of required qubits as the square of the number of reads strongly limits applicability to large use cases, even when procedures to efficiently decompose the problem into subtasks are applied.

    “The number of required qubits scales as the square of the number of reads and this strongly limits its applicability to large use cases, even when procedures to efficiently decompose the problem into subtasks are applied [144].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 37

Authors
Nałęcz-Charkiewicz, K., & Nowak, R. M.
Affiliations
Warsaw University of Technology (PL)
Corresponding author
Nałęcz-Charkiewicz, Katarzyna
Venue
BMC Bioinformatics
Published
2022-04-07
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
122-122
ISSN
1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4223505536
Cited by
37
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Politechnika Warszawska
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Biological Computing
Keywords
DNA sequence assembly, de novo assembly, quantum annealing, traveling salesman problem, genomic signal processing, Pearson correlation, hybrid quantum-classical computing, D-Wave quantum annealer, whole genome sequencing
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Base Sequence, Computing Methodologies, DNA, Quantum Theory, Sequence Analysis, DNA, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review