Algorithm for DNA sequence assembly by quantum annealing
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The assembly task is an indispensable step in sequencing genomes of new organisms and studying structural genomic changes. In recent years, the dynamic development of next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods raises hopes for making whole-genome sequencing a fast and reliable tool used, for example, in medical diagnostics. However, this is hampered by the slowness and computational requirements of the current processing algorithms, which raises the need to develop more efficient algorithms. One possible approach, still little explored, is the use of quantum computing. RESULTS: We present a proof of concept of de novo assembly algorithm, using the Genomic Signal Processing approach, detecting overlaps between DNA reads by calculating the Pearson correlation coefficient and formulating the assembly problem as an optimization task (Traveling Salesman Problem). Computations performed on a classic computer were compared with the results achieved by a hybrid method combining CPU and QPU calculations. For this purpose quantum annealer by D-Wave was used. The experiments were performed with artificially generated data and DNA reads coming from a simulator, with actual organism genomes used as input sequences. To our knowledge, this work is one of the few where actual sequences of organisms were used to study the de novo assembly task on quantum annealer. CONCLUSIONS: Proof of concept carried out by us showed that the use of quantum annealer (QA) for the de novo assembly task might be a promising alternative to the computations performed in the classical model. The current computing power of the available devices requires a hybrid approach (combining CPU and QPU computations). The next step may be developing a hybrid algorithm strictly dedicated to the de novo assembly task, using its specificity (e.g. the sparsity and bounded degree of the overlap-layout-consensus graph).
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In two approaches proposed by Boev et al. [143] and Nałęcz-Charkiewicz and Nowak [144], the OLC graph is obtained with classical computations and mapped into a Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) problem.
“In two approaches proposed by Boev et al. [143] and Nałęcz-Charkiewicz and Nowak [144], OLC graph is obtained with classical computations and mapped into a Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) problem.”
From Quantum computing algorithms: getting closer to critical problems in computational biology (2022) · cites this paper as [144]
The number of required qubits scales as the square of the number of reads.
“The number of required qubits scales as the square of the number of reads and this strongly limits its applicability to large use cases, even when procedures to efficiently decompose the problem into subtasks are applied [144].”
From Quantum computing algorithms: getting closer to critical problems in computational biology (2022) · cites this paper as [144]
The scaling of required qubits as the square of the number of reads strongly limits applicability to large use cases, even when procedures to efficiently decompose the problem into subtasks are applied.
“The number of required qubits scales as the square of the number of reads and this strongly limits its applicability to large use cases, even when procedures to efficiently decompose the problem into subtasks are applied [144].”
From Quantum computing algorithms: getting closer to critical problems in computational biology (2022) · cites this paper as [144]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 37
- Authors
- Nałęcz-Charkiewicz, K., & Nowak, R. M.
- Affiliations
- Warsaw University of Technology (PL)
- Corresponding author
- Nałęcz-Charkiewicz, Katarzyna
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2022-04-07
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 122-122
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8988116
- OpenAlex
- W4223505536
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 2.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMC Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Politechnika Warszawska
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Biological Computing
- Keywords
- DNA sequence assembly, de novo assembly, quantum annealing, traveling salesman problem, genomic signal processing, Pearson correlation, hybrid quantum-classical computing, D-Wave quantum annealer, whole genome sequencing
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Base Sequence, Computing Methodologies, DNA, Quantum Theory, Sequence Analysis, DNA, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review