Estimating RNA dynamics using one time point for one sample in a single-pulse metabolic labeling experiment
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Background: Over the past decade, experimental procedures such as metabolic labeling for determining RNA turnover rates at the transcriptome-wide scale have been widely adopted and are now turning to single cell measurements. Several computational methods to estimate RNA synthesis, processing and degradation rates from such experiments have been suggested, but they all require several RNA sequencing samples. Here we present a method that can estimate those three rates from a single sample. Methods: Our method relies on the analytical solution to the Zeisel model of RNA dynamics. It was validated on metabolic labeling experiments performed on mouse embryonic stem cells. Resulting degradation rates were compared both to previously published rates on the same system and to a state-of-the-art method applied to the same data. Results: Our method is computationally efficient and outputs rates that correlate well with previously published data sets. Using it on a single sample, we were able to reproduce the observation that dynamic biological processes tend to involve genes with higher metabolic rates, while stable processes involve genes with lower rates. This supports the hypothesis that cells control not only the mRNA steady-state abundance, but also its responsiveness, i.e., how fast steady state is reached. Moreover, degradation rates obtained with our method compare favourably with the other tested method. Conclusions: In addition to saving experimental work and computational time, estimating rates for a single sample has several advantages. It does not require an error-prone normalization across samples and enables the use of replicates to estimate uncertainty and assess sample quality. Finally the method and theoretical results described here are general enough to be useful in other contexts such as nucleotide conversion methods and single cell metabolic labeling experiments.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control
Schwanhäusser, B., Busse, D., Li, N., Dittmar, G., Schuchhardt, J., Wolf, J., Chen, W., & Selbach, M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10098 · Cited by 6,566 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Those two GO categories were selected for illustration because they were previously reported to be mostly enriched in high and low turn-over genes respectively [23].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThiol-linked alkylation for the metabolic sequencing of RNA
Herzog, V. A., Reichholf, B., Neumann, T., Rescheneder, P., Bhat, P., Burkard, T. R., Wlotzka, W., von Haeseler, A., Zuber, J., & Ameres, S. L. (2017) · doi:10.1101/177642 · Cited by 622 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Hersch, M., Biasini, A., Marques, A. C., & Bergmann, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Lausanne (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Hersch, Micha
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2022-04-22
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 147-147
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9034570
- OpenAlex
- W4225633004
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMC Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (publishedVersion)
- SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- IRIS (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (310030 152724/1, PP00P3 150667)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- RNA turnover, RNA synthesis rate, mouse embryonic stem cells, gene expression dynamics
- MeSH terms
- Animals, RNA, RNA, Messenger, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Mice, Transcriptome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review