Cited by 8Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsEnzyme Structure and Function

Prop3D: A flexible, Python-based platform for machine learning with protein structural properties and biophysical data

Open access
Draizen, Eli J., Readey, John, Mura, Cameron, Bourne, Philip E.·2024·BMC Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Machine learning (ML) has a rich history in structural bioinformatics, and modern approaches, such as deep learning, are revolutionizing our knowledge of the subtle relationships between biomolecular sequence, structure, function, dynamics and evolution. As with any advance that rests upon statistical learning approaches, the recent progress in biomolecular sciences is enabled by the availability of vast volumes of sufficiently-variable data. To be useful, such data must be well-structured, machine-readable, intelligible and manipulable. These and related requirements pose challenges that become especially acute at the computational scales typical in ML. Furthermore, in structural bioinformatics such data generally relate to protein three-dimensional (3D) structures, which are inherently more complex than sequence-based data. A significant and recurring challenge concerns the creation of large, high-quality, openly-accessible datasets that can be used for specific training and benchmarking tasks in ML pipelines for predictive modeling projects, along with reproducible splits for training and testing. Results: Here, we report ‘’, a platform that allows for the creation, sharing and extensible reuse of libraries of protein domains, featurized with biophysical and evolutionary properties that can range from detailed, atomically-resolved physicochemical quantities (e.g., electrostatics) to coarser, residue-level features (e.g., phylogenetic conservation). As a community resource, we also supply a ‘’ protein dataset, obtained by applying our approach to CATH . We have developed and deployed the framework, both in the cloud and on local HPC resources, to systematically and reproducibly create comprehensive datasets via the Highly Scalable Data Service ( HSDS ). Our datasets are freely accessible via a public HSDS instance, or they can be used with accompanying Python wrappers for popular ML frameworks. Conclusion: and its associated dataset can be of broad utility in at least three ways. Firstly, the workflow code can be customized and deployed on various cloud-based compute platforms, with scalability achieved largely by saving the results to distributed HDF5 files via HSDS . Secondly, the linked dataset provides a hand-crafted, already-featurized dataset of protein domains for 20 highly-populated CATH families; importantly, provision of this pre-computed resource can aid the more efficient development (and reproducible deployment) of ML pipelines. Thirdly, ’s construction explicitly takes into account (in creating datasets and data-splits) the enigma of ‘data leakage’, stemming from the evolutionary relationships between proteins.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12859-023-05586-5

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Draizen, E. J., Readey, J., Mura, C., & Bourne, P. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • The HDF Group (US)
Corresponding author
  • Draizen, Eli J.
  • Mura, Cameron
  • Bourne, Philip E.
Venue
BMC Bioinformatics
Published
2024-01-04
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
11-11
ISSN
1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4390588971
Cited by
8
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • University of Virginia (Presidential Fellowship)
  • National Science Foundation, United States (MCB-1350957)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
protein structural properties, protein domains, biophysical properties, data leakage, training-test split, HDF5, machine learning reproducibility, protein structure prediction, electrostatics, phylogenetic conservation, community resources, high-performance computing
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Humans, Phylogeny, Proteins, Computational Biology, Workflow

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review