A systematic review of poeciliid fish invasions in Africa
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Background: This review compiles and synthesises the existing information concerning non-native poeciliid introductions to Africa. The recent upsurge in research on invasive poeciliids has revealed their widespread occurrence in Africa. Results: Within the 87 relevant articles, 74% reported on the presence of Gambusia spp., 33% on P. reticulata , 19% on X. hellerii , 11% on X. maculatus , and 5% on other ornamental poeciliids. Overall, poeciliids have been documented as introduced to 25 different countries in Africa. With Gambusia spp. being introduced to 16 countries and P. reticulata to 19 countries. Our results are representative of the current state of research on invasive poeciliids in Africa. There was a concentration of studies in South Africa, with limited research elsewhere. Current distribution data is relatively patchy, although widespread surveys of multiple river systems in Morocco and South Africa, confirmed widespread and abundant established poeciliid populations. The ecological impacts of invasive poeciliids in Africa remain understudied but evidence indicates deleterious effects on native fish, invertebrates, and amphibians, many of which are critically endangered or endemic. Conclusion: Current research is limited in reporting from certain countries and ecological impacts. An increased effort to monitor species composition in vulnerable waterbodies, especially in the many African countries where invasive poeciliids are reported, should be completed to reveal further established populations. Future research should prioritise quantifying the ecological impacts of invasive poeciliids in the field and identifying both vulnerable and resistant native ecosystems to guide future management decisions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Scientists' warning on invasive alien species
Pyšek, P., Hulme, P. E., Simberloff, D., Bacher, S., Blackburn, T. M., Carlton, J. T., Dawson, W., Essl, F., Foxcroft, L. C., Genovesi, P., et al. (2020) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12627 · Cited by 2,234 · see citing works
Bending the Curve of Global Freshwater Biodiversity Loss: An Emergency Recovery Plan
Tickner, D., Opperman, J. J., Abell, R., Acreman, M., Arthington, A. H., Bunn, S. E., Cooke, S. J., Dalton, J., Darwall, W., Edwards, G., et al. (2020) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biaa002 · Cited by 1,241 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Fresh-waters exhibit disproportionate species richness per unit area and are subject to high levels of human exploitation, becoming highly vulnerable to anthropogenic and environmental stressors, including species invasion [52, 176].”
BackgroundPredation efficiency of Anopheles gambiae larvae by aquatic predators in western Kenya highlands
Kweka, E. J., Zhou, G., Gilbreath, T. M., Afrane, Y., Nyindo, M., Githeko, A. K., & Yan, G. (2011) · Parasites & Vectors · doi:10.1186/1756-3305-4-128 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Pritchard Cairns, J., de Bragança, P. H. N., & South, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Leeds (GB)
- Corresponding author
- South, Josie
- ORCID
- South, Josie
- Venue
- BMC Ecology and Evolution
- Published
- 2024-11-06
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 136-136
- ISSN
- 2730-7182 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11539733
- OpenAlex
- W4404100084
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6
- FWCI
- 0.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMC Ecology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Mohamed Bin Zayed Fund (202522474)
- UK Research and Innovation (MR/X035662/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine Ecology and Invasive Species
- Keywords
- poeciliid fish, invasive species, non-native fish introductions, Gambusia, Poecilia reticulata, Xiphophorus helleri, Xiphophorus maculatus, ornamental fish, Africa, ecological impacts, native fish, invasive species monitoring, invasive species management
- MeSH terms
- Africa, Animals, Cyprinodontiformes, Ecosystem, Introduced Species
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review