The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Isolation and characterization of native probiotics for fish farming
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Innovations in fish nutrition act as drivers for the sustainable development of the rapidly expanding aquaculture sector. Probiotic dietary supplements are able to improve health and nutrition of livestock, but respective bacteria have mainly been isolated from terrestrial, warm-blooded hosts, limiting an efficient application in fish. Native probiotics adapted to the gastrointestinal tract of the respective fish species will establish within the original host more efficiently. RESULTS: Here, 248 autochthonous isolates were cultured from the digestive system of three temperate flatfish species. Upon 16S rRNA gene sequencing of 195 isolates, 89.7% (n = 175) Gram-negatives belonging to the Alpha- (1.0%), Beta- (4.1%) and Gammaproteobacteria (84.6%) were identified. Candidate probiotics were further characterized using in vitro assays addressing 1) inhibition of pathogens, 2) degradation of plant derived anti-nutrient (saponin) and 3) the content of essential fatty acids (FA) and their precursors. Twelve isolates revealed an inhibition towards the common fish pathogen Tenacibaculum maritimum, seven were able to metabolize saponin as sole carbon and energy source and two isolates 012 Psychrobacter sp. and 047 Paracoccus sp. revealed remarkably high contents of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA). Furthermore, a rapid and cost-effective method to coat feed pellets revealed high viability of the supplemented probiotics over 54 d of storage at 4°C. CONCLUSIONS: Here, a strategy for the isolation and characterization of native probiotic candidates is presented that can easily be adapted to other farmed fish species. The simple coating procedure assures viability of probiotics and can thus be applied for the evaluation of probiotic candidates in the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Role of gastrointestinal microbiota in fish
Nayak, S. K. (2010) · Aquaculture Research · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2109.2010.02546.x · Cited by 1,073
The bacterial microflora of fish, revised
Austin, B. (2006) · The Scientific World JOURNAL · doi:10.1100/tsw.2006.181 · Cited by 346
Contextual social cognition impairments in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder
Baez, S., Herrera, E., Villarin, L., Theil, D., Gonzalez-Gadea, M. L., Gomez, P., Mosquera, M., Huepe, D., Strejilevich, S., Vigliecca, N. S., et al. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057664 · Cited by 138
Cited by
Legrand, T. P. R. A., Wynne, J. W., Weyrich, L. S., & Oxley, A. P. A. (2020) · Reviews in Aquaculture · doi:10.1111/raq.12375 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Wanka, K. M., Damerau, T., Costas, B., Krueger, A., Schulz, C., & Wuertz, S.
- Venue
- BMC Microbiology
- Published
- 2018-09-20
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 119-119
- ISSN
- 1471-2180 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2889582975
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Isolation and characterization of native probiotics for fish farming. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12866-018-1260-2
- The paper
- Wanka, K. M., Damerau, T., Costas, B., Krueger, A., Schulz, C., & Wuertz, S. (2018). Isolation and characterization of native probiotics for fish farming. BMC Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-018-1260-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.