Effects of water recirculation rate on the microbial community and water quality in relation to the growth and survival of white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Microbial community and its management are crucial to the stabilization of culture environment for recirculating aquaculture system (RAS). Although several studies have been carried out for the microbial community of RAS, few studies were on the RAS for shrimp. Water recirculation ratio is an important factor for the microbial community and the management of RAS. Therefore, low (LC), medium (MC) and high (HC) recirculation ratio systems were set to explore the microbial community constitution of RAS for Litopenaeus vannamei and study the effect of water recirculation rate on it. RESULTS: The bacterial community of bioreactor was mainly dominated by Proteobacteria (41.6-70.7%), followed with Planctomycetes (12.5-31.0%), Bacteroidetes (10.5-26.0%), Actinobacteria (1.1-4.8%) and Verrucomicrobia (1.4-6.8%) phylum. The most dominant family of bioreactor was Rhodobacteraceae or Planctomycetaceae. The bacterial community of culture water was simpler than bioreactor and dominated by Proteobacteria (61.8-96.4%). The dominant bacterial groups of bioreactor and culture water are also different among the three water recirculation rates, and the proportions of dominant groups showed a trend with the variety of water recirculation rate. Water quality indexes including ammonia and nitrite decreased with the increasing of water recirculation rate. According to the growth performance of L. vannamei, shrimp had better performance of growth rate and final weight in MC and HC, however, shrimp had higher survival and yield in LC. Shrimp survival and yield had an inverse correlation with water recirculation rate. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate the microbial community of RAS for shrimp, highlight the importance of further studies on the function of bacterial taxa, and promote the understanding of the effects of water recirculation rate on the microbiota. The findings suggest that water recirculation rate has important impacts on the microbial community, water quality and shrimp growth. Increasing the water recirculation rate could improve the water quality and promote the growth of shrimp. However, the survival rate and yield of L. vannamei are higher under low water recirculation rate. Recirculation rate is an effective method to manage RAS, and its impact on RAS needs further study, especially in the application of low level of water recirculation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Marinobacter and Aestuariibacter have been identified in the rearing environment of adult L. vannamei and brackishwater shrimps.
“Marinobacter and Aestuariibacter have been identified in the rearing environment of adult L. vannamei and brackishwater shrimps (Chen et al., 2019; Dineshkumar et al., 2014).”
From Potential lineage transmission within the active microbiota of the eggs and the nauplii of the shrimp <i>Litopenaeus stylirostris</i> : possible influence of the rearing water and more (2021) · cites this paper as Chen et al., 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 94 · Cited by 67
- Authors
- Chen, Z., Chang, Z., Zhang, L., Jiang, Y., Ge, H., Song, X., Chen, S., Zhao, F., & Li, J.
- Affiliations
- Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute (CN)
- Ocean University of China (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Li, Jian
- Venue
- BMC Microbiology
- Published
- 2019-08-19
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 192-192
- ISSN
- 1471-2180 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6701121
- OpenAlex
- W2969844911
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 94
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9
- FWCI
- 3.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMC Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Greater South Information System
- Funders
- Ministry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of China (China Agriculture Research System-48)
- Shandong Province (LJNY2015002)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Aquaculture disease management and microbiota
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Innovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics Systems
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
- Keywords
- recirculating aquaculture system, Litopenaeus vannamei, white shrimp, microbial communities, bacterial communities, water quality, ammonia, nitrite, shrimp growth, shrimp survival, shrimp yield, bioreactors, Proteobacteria, Planctomycetes, Rhodobacteraceae, Planctomycetaceae, aquaculture
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Bacteria, Fresh Water, Aquaculture, Penaeidae, Water Quality, Microbiota
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review