Cited by 11Probiotics and Fermented FoodsEscherichia coli research studiesGut microbiota and health

Comprehensive probiogenomics analysis of the commensal Escherichia coli CEC15 as a potential probiotic strain

Open access
da Silva, Tales Fernando, Glória, Rafael de Assis, de Sousa, Thiago Jesus, Americo, Monique Ferrary, Freitas, Andria dos Santos, Viana, Marcus Vinicius Canário, de Jesus, Luís Cláudio Lima, da Silva Prado, Ligia Carolina +19 more·2023·BMC Microbiology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Probiotics have gained attention for their potential maintaining gut and immune homeostasis. They have been found to confer protection against pathogen colonization, possess immunomodulatory effects, enhance gut barrier functionality, and mitigate inflammation. However, a thorough understanding of the unique mechanisms of effects triggered by individual strains is necessary to optimize their therapeutic efficacy. Probiogenomics, involving high-throughput techniques, can help identify uncharacterized strains and aid in the rational selection of new probiotics. This study evaluates the potential of the Escherichia coli CEC15 strain as a probiotic through in silico , in vitro , and in vivo analyses, comparing it to the well-known probiotic reference E. coli Nissle 1917. Genomic analysis was conducted to identify traits with potential beneficial activity and to assess the safety of each strain (genomic islands, bacteriocin production, antibiotic resistance, production of proteins involved in host homeostasis, and proteins with adhesive properties). In vitro studies assessed survival in gastrointestinal simulated conditions and adhesion to cultured human intestinal cells. Safety was evaluated in BALB/c mice, monitoring the impact of E. coli consumption on clinical signs, intestinal architecture, intestinal permeability, and fecal microbiota. Additionally, the protective effects of both strains were assessed in a murine model of 5-FU-induced mucositis. Results: CEC15 mitigates inflammation, reinforces intestinal barrier, and modulates intestinal microbiota. In silico analysis revealed fewer pathogenicity-related traits in CEC15, when compared to Nissle 1917, with fewer toxin-associated genes and no gene suggesting the production of colibactin (a genotoxic agent). Most predicted antibiotic-resistance genes were neither associated with actual resistance, nor with transposable elements. The genome of CEC15 strain encodes proteins related to stress tolerance and to adhesion, in line with its better survival during digestion and higher adhesion to intestinal cells, when compared to Nissle 1917. Moreover, CEC15 exhibited beneficial effects on mice and their intestinal microbiota, both in healthy animals and against 5FU-induced intestinal mucositis. Conclusions: These findings suggest that the CEC15 strain holds promise as a probiotic, as it could modulate the intestinal microbiota, providing immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects, and reinforcing the intestinal barrier. These findings may have implications for the treatment of gastrointestinal disorders, particularly some forms of diarrhea.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12866-023-03112-4

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 187 · Cited by 11

Authors
da Silva, T. F., Glória, R. D. A., de Sousa, T. J., Americo, M. F., Freitas, A. D. S., Viana, M. V. C., de Jesus, L. C. L., da Silva Prado, L. C., Daniel, N., Ménard, O., Cochet, M.-F., Dupont, D., Jardin, J., Borges, A. D., Fernandes, S. O. A., Cardoso, V. N., Brenig, B., Ferreira, E., Profeta, R., Aburjaile, F. F., de Carvalho, R. D. O., Langella, P., Le Loir, Y., Cherbuy, C., Jan, G., Azevedo, V., & Guédon, É.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
  • Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
  • University of Göttingen (DE)
  • AgroParisTech (FR)
Corresponding author
Guédon, Éric
Venue
BMC Microbiology
Published
2023-11-27
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
364-364
ISSN
1471-2180 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4389055642
Cited by
11
References
187
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6
FWCI
1.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • This work was supported by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) and National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) from Brazil.
  • This work has received financial support from INRAE (Rennes, France) and Institut Agro (Rennes, France).
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Endocrinology › Escherichia coli research studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
probiotic strains, probiogenomics, Escherichia coli Nissle 1917, gut commensal bacteria, intestinal mucositis, intestinal barrier, intestinal permeability, gut microbiota, colibactin, bacteriocin production, antibiotic resistance genes, bacterial adhesion, simulated gastrointestinal conditions, immunomodulation, inflammation
MeSH terms
Animals, Escherichia coli, Humans, Inflammation, Probiotics, Escherichia coli Proteins, Mice, Mucositis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review