Cited by 21Gene expression and cancer classificationArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Construction of genetic classification model for coronary atherosclerosis heart disease using three machine learning methods

Open access
Peng, Wenjuan, Sun, Yuan, Zhang, Ling·2022·BMC Cardiovascular Disorders

Abstract

Background: Although the diagnostic method for coronary atherosclerosis heart disease (CAD) is constantly innovated, CAD in the early stage is still missed diagnosis for the absence of any symptoms. The gene expression levels varied during disease development; therefore, a classifier based on gene expression might contribute to CAD diagnosis. This study aimed to construct genetic classification models for CAD using gene expression data, which may provide new insight into the understanding of its pathogenesis. Methods: All statistical analysis was completed by R 3.4.4 software. Three raw gene expression datasets (GSE12288, GSE7638 and GSE66360) related to CAD were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database and included for analysis. Limma package was performed to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between CAD samples and healthy controls. The WGCNA package was conducted to recognize CAD-related gene modules and hub genes, followed by recursive feature elimination analysis to select the optimal features genes (OFGs). The genetic classification models were established using support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF) and logistic regression (LR), respectively. Further validation and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were conducted to evaluate the classification performance. Results: In total, 374 DEGs, eight gene modules, 33 hub genes and 12 OFGs (HTR4, KISS1, CA12, CAMK2B, KLK2, DDC, CNGB1, DERL1, BCL6, LILRA2, HCK, MTF2) were identified. ROC curve analysis showed that the accuracy of SVM, RF and LR were 75.58%, 63.57% and 63.95% in validation; with area under the curve of 0.813 (95% confidence interval, 95% CI 0.761–0.866, P < 0.0001), 0.727 (95% CI 0.665–0.788, P < 0.0001) and 0.783 (95% CI 0.725–0.841, P < 0.0001), respectively. Conclusions: In conclusion, this study found 12 gene signatures involved in the pathogenic mechanism of CAD. Among the CAD classifiers constructed by three machine learning methods, the SVM model has the best performance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12872-022-02481-4

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 58 · Cited by 21

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [30]Pavlov YL Random forests 2019 Berlin De Gruyter

Authors
Peng, W., Sun, Y., & Zhang, L.
Affiliations
Capital Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Ling
Venue
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Published
2022-02-12
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
42-42
ISSN
1471-2261 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4211115174
Cited by
21
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Cardiovascular Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of China (81973121, 81373076)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0900603)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
coronary artery disease, gene expression, differentially expressed genes, gene modules, hub genes, support vector machine, random forest, logistic regression, 5-HT4 receptor, KISS1, CAMK2B, DDC, CNGB1, BCL6, Hck, MTF2
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Coronary Artery Disease, Humans, Models, Genetic, Phenotype, Predictive Value of Tests, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Gene Expression Profiling, Databases, Genetic, Transcriptome, Support Vector Machine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review