Construction of genetic classification model for coronary atherosclerosis heart disease using three machine learning methods
Open accessAbstract
Background: Although the diagnostic method for coronary atherosclerosis heart disease (CAD) is constantly innovated, CAD in the early stage is still missed diagnosis for the absence of any symptoms. The gene expression levels varied during disease development; therefore, a classifier based on gene expression might contribute to CAD diagnosis. This study aimed to construct genetic classification models for CAD using gene expression data, which may provide new insight into the understanding of its pathogenesis. Methods: All statistical analysis was completed by R 3.4.4 software. Three raw gene expression datasets (GSE12288, GSE7638 and GSE66360) related to CAD were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database and included for analysis. Limma package was performed to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between CAD samples and healthy controls. The WGCNA package was conducted to recognize CAD-related gene modules and hub genes, followed by recursive feature elimination analysis to select the optimal features genes (OFGs). The genetic classification models were established using support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF) and logistic regression (LR), respectively. Further validation and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were conducted to evaluate the classification performance. Results: In total, 374 DEGs, eight gene modules, 33 hub genes and 12 OFGs (HTR4, KISS1, CA12, CAMK2B, KLK2, DDC, CNGB1, DERL1, BCL6, LILRA2, HCK, MTF2) were identified. ROC curve analysis showed that the accuracy of SVM, RF and LR were 75.58%, 63.57% and 63.95% in validation; with area under the curve of 0.813 (95% confidence interval, 95% CI 0.761–0.866, P < 0.0001), 0.727 (95% CI 0.665–0.788, P < 0.0001) and 0.783 (95% CI 0.725–0.841, P < 0.0001), respectively. Conclusions: In conclusion, this study found 12 gene signatures involved in the pathogenic mechanism of CAD. Among the CAD classifiers constructed by three machine learning methods, the SVM model has the best performance.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Peng et al. [147] achieved AUCs of 81.3% for SVM, 72.7% for RF, and 78.3% for LR for coronary atherosclerosis heart disease classification.
“Their respective areas under the curve were 81.3% (95% CI 0.761–0.866, p < 0.0001), 72.7% (95% CI 0.665–0.788, p < 0.0001), and 78.3% (95% CI 0.725–0.841, p < 0.0001).”
From A Comprehensive Review on Synergy of Multi-Modal Data and AI Technologies in Medical Diagnosis (2024) · cites this paper as [147]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 58 · Cited by 21
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [30]Pavlov YL Random forests 2019 Berlin De Gruyter
- Authors
- Peng, W., Sun, Y., & Zhang, L.
- Affiliations
- Capital Medical University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhang, Ling
- ORCID
- Venue
- BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
- Published
- 2022-02-12
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 42-42
- ISSN
- 1471-2261 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8840658
- OpenAlex
- W4211115174
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 1.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMC Cardiovascular Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Natural Science Foundation of China (81973121, 81373076)
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0900603)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Keywords
- coronary artery disease, gene expression, differentially expressed genes, gene modules, hub genes, support vector machine, random forest, logistic regression, 5-HT4 receptor, KISS1, CAMK2B, DDC, CNGB1, BCL6, Hck, MTF2
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Coronary Artery Disease, Humans, Models, Genetic, Phenotype, Predictive Value of Tests, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Gene Expression Profiling, Databases, Genetic, Transcriptome, Support Vector Machine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review