Cited by 27Balance, Gait, and Falls PreventionNutrition and Health in AgingFrailty in Older Adults

Relative contribution of muscle strength, lean mass, and lower extremity motor function in explaining between-person variance in mobility in older adults

Open access
Wages, Nathan P., Simon, Janet E., Clark, Leatha A., Amano, Shinichi, Russ, David W., Manini, Todd M., Clark, Brian C.·2020·BMC Geriatrics

Abstract

Abstract Background Approximately 35% of individuals > 70 years have mobility limitations. Historically, it was posited lean mass and muscle strength were major contributors to mobility limitations, but recent findings indicate lean mass and muscle strength only moderately explain mobility limitations. One likely reason is that lean mass and muscle strength do not necessarily incorporate measures globally reflective of motor function (defined as the ability to learn, or to demonstrate, the skillful and efficient assumption, maintenance, modification, and control of voluntary postures and movement patterns). In this study we determined the relative contribution of lean mass, muscle strength, and the four square step test, as an index of lower extremity motor function, in explaining between-participant variance in mobility tasks. Methods In community-dwelling older adults (N = 89; 67% women; mean 74.9 ± 6.7 years), we quantified grip and leg extension strength, total and regional lean mass, and time to complete the four square step test. Mobility was assessed via 6-min walk gait speed, stair climb power, 5x-chair rise time, and time to complete a complex functional task. Multifactorial linear regression modeling was used to determine the relative contribution (via semi-partial r2) for indices of lean mass, indices of muscle strength, and the four square step test. Results When aggregated by sex, the four square step test explained 17–34% of the variance for all mobility tasks (p < 0.01). Muscle strength explained ~ 12% and ~ 7% of the variance in 6-min walk gait speed and 5x-chair rise time, respectively (p < 0.02). Lean mass explained 32% and ~ 4% of the variance in stair climb power and complex functional task time, respectively (p < 0.02). When disaggregated by sex, lean mass was a stronger predictor of mobility in men. Conclusion The four square step test is uniquely associated with multiple measures of mobility in older adults, suggesting lower extremity motor function is an important factor for mobility performance. Trial registration NCT02505529 –2015/07/22.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12877-020-01656-y

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All reported outcomes rely on the integration of several health and skill-related domains, thus the results may have been influenced by changes in rate of force development, maximal strength or a combination of both.

    “All of the reported outcomes rely on the integration of several health and skill-related domains, 88 thus the results may have been in fl uenced by changes in rate of force development, maximal strength or a combination of both. 88 -90”

    From High-velocity power training has similar effects to traditional resistance training for functional performance in older adults: a systematic review (2023) · cites this paper as [90]

    The Discussion describes mobility as multifactorial and requiring integration of sensory, neural, and musculoskeletal functions, supporting the point that the outcomes involve several domains. The Methods report maximal strength measures, but the paper does not assess rate of force development or changes in either measure; its cross-sectional design cannot establish that such changes influenced the reported outcomes. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 55 · Cited by 27

Authors
Wages, N. P., Simon, J. E., Clark, L. A., Amano, S., Russ, D. W., Manini, T. M., & Clark, B. C.
Affiliations
  • Ohio University (US)
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Clark, Brian C.
Venue
BMC Geriatrics
Published
2020-07-28
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
255-255
ISSN
1471-2318 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3045890058
Cited by
27
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
7.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Geriatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01 AG044424)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
Keywords
mobility limitations, older adults, muscle strength, lean body mass, lower limb motor function, Four Square Step Test, grip strength, leg extension strength, walking speed, chair rise time, functional task performance, sex differences, community-dwelling older adults
MeSH terms
Aged, Exercise Test, Female, Humans, Male, Walking, Muscle, Skeletal, Lower Extremity, Mobility Limitation, Muscle Strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review