Development of fluconazole resistance in a series of Candida parapsilosis isolates from a persistent candidemia patient with prolonged antifungal therapy
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Candida parapsilosis was the most common species causing candidemia in the 2010 China Hospital Invasive Fungal Surveillance Net (CHIF-NET) database. Compared to Candida albicans, the description of azole resistance and mechanisms in C. parapsilosis is very limited. We report a patient with C. parapsilosis candidemia over several months, due to a probable intravascular source, who developed fluconazole resistance after prolonged treatment. CASE PRESENTATION: An 82 year-old male had a hospital admission of approximately 1.5 years duration. He was initially admitted with acute pancreatitis. Prior to succumbing to the illness, he developed candidemia and treated with three antifungal drugs for nearly 5 months, at suboptimal doses and without source control. Following treatment, 6 blood cultures were still positive for C. parapsilosis. The last 2 strains were resistant to fluconazole (MICs 32 μg/mL) and intermediate to voriconazole (MICs 0.5 μg/mL). Microsatellite multilocus analysis indicated that the 6 isolates from the patient belonged to a single genotype. The first 4 isolates were susceptible to fluconazole (MICs 2 μg/mL) and voriconazole (MICs 0.015-0.03 μg/mL), which were slightly higher than susceptible control strains from other patients. Overexpression of MDR1 genes were detected in the two resistant isolates, and this was associated with a homozygous mutation in MRR1 genes (T2957C /T2957C), with the amino acid exchange L986P. CONCLUSIONS: This case corroborates that the resistant C. parapsilosis isolates can emerge in the setting of complicated infections and the extensive use of antifungal agents, emphasizing the need for standardizing and improving the antifungal treatment as well as source control in the treatment of infection diseases.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Resistance to azoles in C. parapsilosis has been attributed to mutations in MRR1 and ERG11 (Y132F alone or with R398I), and overexpression of CDR1, MDR1, and ERG11.
“Resistance to azoles in C. parapsilosis has been attributed to mutations in the transcription factor gene MRR1 [84] and ERG11 (Y132F, either alone or in combination with an R398I) [85,86,87], and overexpression of CDR1, MDR1, and ERG11 [85,86,88].”
From Evolutionary Emergence of Drug Resistance in Candida Opportunistic Pathogens (2018) · cites this paper as [84]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 62
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [24]Berkow E, Manigaba K, Wanamaker E, Barker K, Caudle K, Rogers PD. Molecular Mechanisms of Multidrug Resistance in Candida parapsilosis. Poster. the 12th American Society for Microbiology (ASM) Conference, USA, 2014.
- Authors
- Zhang, L., Xiao, M., Watts, M. R., Wang, H., Fan, X., Kong, F., & Xu, Y.-C.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Venue
- BMC Infectious Diseases
- Published
- 2015-08-18
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 340-340
- ISSN
- 1471-2334 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4539859
- OpenAlex
- W1887576226
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 6.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BMC Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Peking Union Medical College
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Keywords
- Candida parapsilosis, candidemia, fluconazole resistance, azole resistance, voriconazole, multidrug resistance, persistent candidemia, source control, invasive fungal infections
- MeSH terms
- Aged, 80 and over, Antifungal Agents, Candida, China, Humans, Male, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Fluconazole, Drug Resistance, Fungal, Candidemia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review