Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 170

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Results from the centers for disease control and prevention’s predict the 2013–2014 Influenza Season Challenge

Open access
for the Influenza Forecasting Contest Working Group, Biggerstaff, Matthew, Alper, David, Dredze, Mark, Fox, Spencer, Fung, Isaac Chun-Hai, Hickmann, Kyle S., Lewis, Bryan, Rosenfeld, Roni, Shaman, Jeffrey, Tsou, Ming-Hsiang, Velardi, Paola, Vespignani, Alessandro, Finelli, Lyn·2016·BMC Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early insights into the timing of the start, peak, and intensity of the influenza season could be useful in planning influenza prevention and control activities. To encourage development and innovation in influenza forecasting, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) organized a challenge to predict the 2013-14 Unites States influenza season. METHODS: Challenge contestants were asked to forecast the start, peak, and intensity of the 2013-2014 influenza season at the national level and at any or all Health and Human Services (HHS) region level(s). The challenge ran from December 1, 2013-March 27, 2014; contestants were required to submit 9 biweekly forecasts at the national level to be eligible. The selection of the winner was based on expert evaluation of the methodology used to make the prediction and the accuracy of the prediction as judged against the U.S. Outpatient Influenza-like Illness Surveillance Network (ILINet). RESULTS: Nine teams submitted 13 forecasts for all required milestones. The first forecast was due on December 2, 2013; 3/13 forecasts received correctly predicted the start of the influenza season within one week, 1/13 predicted the peak within 1 week, 3/13 predicted the peak ILINet percentage within 1 %, and 4/13 predicted the season duration within 1 week. For the prediction due on December 19, 2013, the number of forecasts that correctly forecasted the peak week increased to 2/13, the peak percentage to 6/13, and the duration of the season to 6/13. As the season progressed, the forecasts became more stable and were closer to the season milestones. CONCLUSION: Forecasting has become technically feasible, but further efforts are needed to improve forecast accuracy so that policy makers can reliably use these predictions. CDC and challenge contestants plan to build upon the methods developed during this contest to improve the accuracy of influenza forecasts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12879-016-1669-x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 170

Metadata

Authors
for the Influenza Forecasting Contest Working Group, Biggerstaff, M., Alper, D., Dredze, M., Fox, S., Fung, I. C.-H., Hickmann, K. S., Lewis, B., Rosenfeld, R., Shaman, J., Tsou, M.-H., Velardi, P., Vespignani, A., & Finelli, L.
Venue
BMC Infectious Diseases
Published
2016-07-22
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
357-357
ISSN
1471-2334 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2486241280
Cited by
170
References
5
FWCI
22.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Results from the centers for disease control and prevention’s predict the 2013–2014 Influenza Season Challenge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12879-016-1669-x
The paper
for the Influenza Forecasting Contest Working Group, Biggerstaff, M., Alper, D., Dredze, M., Fox, S., Fung, I. C.-H., Hickmann, K. S., Lewis, B., Rosenfeld, R., Shaman, J., Tsou, M.-H., Velardi, P., Vespignani, A., & Finelli, L. (2016). Results from the centers for disease control and prevention’s predict the 2013–2014 Influenza Season Challenge. BMC Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1669-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.