Cited by 22Maternal and fetal healthcareClinical practice guidelines implementationHealth Policy Implementation Science

Influencing factors for high quality care on postpartum haemorrhage in the Netherlands: Patient and professional perspectives

Open access
Woiski, Mallory D., Belfroid, Evelien, Liefers, Janine, Grol, Richard P., Scheepers, Hubertina C., Hermens, Rosella P.·2015·BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) remains a major contributor to maternal morbidity even in high resource settings, despite the development and dissemination of evidence-based guidelines and Advance-Trauma-Life-Support (ATLS) based courses for optimal management of PPH. We aimed to assess current influencing factors (obstacles and facilitators) for the delivery of high quality PPH-care from both patient and professional perspective. METHODS: We qualitatively explored influencing factors for delivering high quality PPH-care, by having individual interviews with PPH-patients and focus group interviews with the different types of professionals working in the delivery room. For both perspectives, the theoretical frameworks of Grol and Cabana were used to classify the influencing factors for optimal PPH-care (factors of the guidelines, of professionals, of patients, of the social setting and of the organisation). In order to assess the importance of the influencing factors found among the professionals, we quantified these factors in a web-based questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients and 41 professionals participated in the interviews, and 315 complete surveys were analyzed. The main obstacle for high quality PPH-care identified by patients was the lack of information given by the professionals to the patient and partner before, during and after the PPH event. An informative patient website, a patient leaflet and a follow-up consultation were mentioned as facilitators. The main obstacles according to the professionals were: lack of clarity of the guidelines, lack of knowledge and failing team-communication. Team training and checklists/ flowcharts were considered facilitators. CONCLUSIONS: Different obstacles to the delivery of high quality PPH-care were identified by both patients and professionals. These data can be used to develop a focused strategy to improve PPH-care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT 00928863.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12884-015-0707-9

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 22

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [26]Wensing M Laurant M Hulscher M Grol R Theory an Practice of Clinical Guidelines of Implementation; Chapter 6: Methods for identifying barriers and facilitators for implementation Danish Institute for Heath Services Research and Development 1999 119 31

Authors
Woiski, M. D., Belfroid, E., Liefers, J., Grol, R. P., Scheepers, H. C., & Hermens, R. P.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
Corresponding author
Woiski, Mallory D.
Venue
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published
2015-10-23
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
272-272
ISSN
1471-2393 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2180572933
Cited by
22
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • ZonMw (No. 80-82315-98-09003, 80-82315-98-09003)
  • Bộ Giáo dục và Ðào tạo
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
postpartum hemorrhage, quality of care, maternal morbidity, patient information, patient perspectives, professional perspectives, team training, patient education materials, follow-up visits, barriers and facilitators
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Clinical Competence, Communication, Female, Postpartum Hemorrhage, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Midwifery, Netherlands, Obstetrics, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Patient Care Team, Patient Education as Topic, Pregnancy, Professional-Patient Relations, Surveys and Questionnaires, Maternal-Child Nursing, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Guideline Adherence, Quality Indicators, Health Care, Qualitative Research, Checklist

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review