Cited by 77Global Maternal and Child HealthHealth Policy Implementation ScienceMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Establishing partnership with traditional birth attendants for improved maternal and newborn health: a review of factors influencing implementation

Open access
Miller, Tina, Smith, Helen·2017·BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent World Health Organization recommendations recognize the important role Traditional Birth Attendants (TBAs) can play in supporting the health of women and newborns. This paper provides an analysis of key factors that affect the implementation of interventions to develop partnerships with TBAs to promote improved access to skilled care at birth. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of 20 papers identified through two systematic reviews that examined the effectiveness of interventions to find new roles for TBAs on maternal and newborn health outcomes, as well as papers identified through a systematic mapping of the maternal health literature. The Supporting the Use of Research Evidence framework (SURE) guided the thematic analysis to explore the perceptions of various stakeholders and implementation barriers and facilitators, as well as other contextual issues. RESULTS: This analysis identified countries that have implemented interventions to support the transition from birth with a TBA to birth with a skilled birth attendant. Drawing on the experiences of these countries, the analysis highlights factors that are important to consider when designing and implementing such interventions. Barriers to implementation included resistance to change in more traditional communities, negative attitudes between TBAs and skilled attendants and TBAs concerns about the financial implications of assuming new roles. Facilitating factors included stakeholder involvement in devising and implementing interventions, knowledge sharing between TBAs and skilled birth attendants, and formalised roles and responsibilities and remuneration for TBAs. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation barriers identified in this analysis could, if not addressed, prevent or discourage TBAs from carrying out newly defined roles supporting women in pregnancy and childbirth and linking them to the formal health system. This paper also identifies the factors that seem critical to success, which new programmes could consider adopting from the outset. In most cases a multi-faceted approach is needed to prepare TBAs and others for new roles, including the training of TBAs to strengthen their knowledge and skills to enable them to be able to assume new roles, alongside the sensitization of healthcare providers, communities, women and their families. Further research is required to map the transition process and stakeholder experiences in more detailed ways and to provide longer-term monitoring of existing interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12884-017-1534-y

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Traditional birth attendants effectively garner trust among women in their communities.

    “Nonetheless, TBAs effectively garner trust among women in their communities (Miller & Smith, Citation2017), and given the discrimination the Rohingya face in Bangladeshi health care facilities, cultivating trust in health care facilities among the Rohingya is critical.”

    From Recommendations to improve maternal mortality among Rohingya women in Bangladeshi refugee camps (2025) · cites this paper as Miller & Smith, 2017

    The Results and Discussion report that including TBAs as a culturally acceptable bridge increased trust between local women and facility staff. They do not establish the distinct claim that TBAs themselves effectively gain women’s trust in their communities; the Discussion also notes limited reporting of women’s experiences. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Due to their cultural and social acceptability, traditional birth attendants are critical for health education, serve as a positive link for women and families to preexisting health care structures, and provide comfort regarding disseminating accurate health information and culturally sensitive care.

    “Due to their cultural and social acceptability within the community, TBAs are critical for health education, serving as a positive link for women and families to preexisting health care structures (WHO, Citation2004), and providing a sense of comfort regarding disseminating accurate health information and culturally sensitive care (Miller & Smith, Citation2017).”

    From Recommendations to improve maternal mortality among Rohingya women in Bangladeshi refugee camps (2025) · cites this paper as Miller & Smith, 2017

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. [2]World Health Organization. WHO Recommendations – Optimize MNH: optimizing health worker roles for maternal and newborn health interventions through task shifting. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/77764/1/9789241504843_eng.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2015. 23844452
  2. [4]Frankenberg E Buttenheim A Sikoki B Suriastini W Do women increase their use of reproductive health care when it becomes more available? Evidence from Indonesia Stud Family Plann 2009 40 1 27 38 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2009.00184.x PMC4377086 19397183 · DOI
  3. [5]Ronsmans C Endang A Gunawan S Evaluation of a comprehensive home-based midwifery programme in South Kalimantan, Indonesia Trop Med Int Health 2001 6 10 799 810 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2001.00780.x 11679128 · DOI
  4. [6]Fauveau V Stewart K Khan SA Chakraborty J Effect on mortality of community-based maternity-care programme in rural Bangladesh Lancet 1991 338 8776 1183 6 10.1016/0140-6736(91)92041-Y 1682600 · DOI
  5. [8]World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on health promotion interventions for maternal and newborn health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. Available from: http://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/documents/health-promotion-interventions/en/. Accessed 20 Apr 2017. 26180864
  6. [9]Byrne A Morgan A How the integration of traditional birth attendants with formal health systems can increase skilled birth attendance Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2011 115 127 134 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.06.019 21924419 · DOI
  7. [10]Vieira C Portela A Miller T Coast E Leone T Marston C Increasing the use of skilled health personnel where traditional birth attendants were providers of childbirth care: a systematic review PLoS One 2012 7 10 e47946 10.1371/journal.pone.0047946 23110138 PMC3480459 · DOI
  8. [11]Braine T Mexico's midwives enter the mainstream B World Health Organ. 2008 86 4 244 245 10.2471/BLT.08.010408 PMC2647425 18438508 · DOI
  9. [13]Purdin S Khan T Saucier R Reducing maternal mortaility among Afghan refugees in Pakistan Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2009 105 82 85 10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.12.021 19232603 · DOI
  10. [15]Thorne S Ethical and representational issues in qualitative secondary analysis Qual Health Res 1998 8 4 547 555 10.1177/104973239800800408 10558343 · DOI
  11. [18]WHO recommendations on health promotion interventions for maternal and newborn health: evidence base. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. Available from: http://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/documents/health-promotion-interventions/en/. Accessed 29 Oct 2015. 26180864
  12. [19]Gabrysch S Lema C Bedrinana E Bautista MA Malca R Campbell OM Miranda JJ Cultural adaptation of birthing services in rural Ayacucho, Peru BWorld Health Organ 2009 87 9 724 729 10.2471/BLT.08.057794 PMC2739914 19784454 · DOI
  13. [28]Koblinsky MA Campbell O Heichelheim J Organizing delivery care: What works for safe motherhood? B World Health Organ 1999 77 5 399 406 PMC2557673 10361757
  14. [29]Onuki D Humanization of childbirth in Bolivia Midwifery Today-International Midwife. 2002 64 54 55 12526599
  15. [30]Davis-Floyd R La partera profesional: articulating identity and cultural space for a new kind of midwife in Mexico Med Anthropol 2001 20 2–3 185 243 10.1080/01459740.2001.9966194 11817855 · DOI
  16. [31]van Roosmalen J Walraven G Stekelenburg J Massawe S (2005) Editorial: integrating continuous support of the traditional birth attendant into obstetric care by skilled midwives and doctors: a cost-effective strategy to reduce perinatal mortality and unnecessary obstetric interventions Trop Med Int Health 2005 10 5 393 394 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01411.x 15860084 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, T., & Smith, H.
Affiliations
  • Oxford Brookes University (GB)
  • Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (GB)
Corresponding author
Miller, Tina
Venue
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published
2017-10-19
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
365-365
ISSN
1471-2393 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2766823477
Cited by
77
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSTM Online Archive (Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Radar (Oxford Brookes University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
traditional birth attendants, skilled birth attendants, maternal and newborn health, implementation barriers and facilitators, stakeholder engagement, TBA training, resistance to change, community sensitization
MeSH terms
Maternal-Child Health Services, Adult, Female, Health Plan Implementation, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Midwifery, Pregnancy, Parturition, Delivery, Obstetric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review