Cited by 37Global Maternal and Child HealthMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsMaternal and fetal healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Factors affecting utilization of health facilities for labour and childbirth: a case study from rural Uganda

Open access
Dantas, Jaya A. R., Singh, Debra, Lample, May·2020·BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Abstract

Background: Since 2000 considerable attention has been placed on maternal health outcomes as the 5th Millennium Goal. In Uganda, only 65% of births are delivered by a skilled birth attendant, contributing to the 435 women that die in every 100,000 births from unattended complications. Factors that impact a women’s decision on where to deliver include cost and household barriers, poor health services and lack of education. Methods: Insight into factors impacting maternal health decision-making in two villages in South Eastern Uganda, were explored through a cross-sectional study using focus group discussions (FDGs) with men and women and administering a simple questionnaire. Results: For men and women in the villages, cultural and community patterns of behavior have the strongest impact on delivery options. While women with no complications could often find options to deliver safely, lack of emergency obstetric care remains a strong factor in maternal deaths. Conclusions: This article proposes that communities be engaged in identifying and leveraging their strengths to find solutions for challenges facing women in achieving safe deliveries.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12884-019-2674-z

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Nam, SL. FIGO saving mothers and newborns project in uganda: reduction of maternal and newborn mortality in uganda final evaluation. 2011. http://www.figo.org/sites/default/files/uploads/project-publications/SMN/Uganda_3.pdf. Accessed 30 Nov 2016.
  2. Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS) and ICF International Inc. Uganda Demographic and Health Survey 2011. Kampala and Maryland: UBOS and Calverton: ICF International Inc; 2012. https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR264/FR264.pdf. Accessed 15 Nov 2016
  3. Deussom R, Jaskiewicz W, Dwyer S, Tulenko K. Holding Health Workers Accountable: Governance Approaches to Reducing Absenteeism. Technical Brief. 2012. https://www.intrahealth.org/sites/ihweb/files/files/media/holding-health-workers-accountable-governance-approaches-to-reducing-absenteeism/holding-health-workers-accountable-governance-approaches-reducing-absenteeism.pdf.
  4. Campinha-Bacote J. The process of cultural competence in the delivery of healthcare services: The journey continues. Cincinatti: LH: Transcultural C.A.R.E Associates; 2007.
  5. Brown JD. Characteristics of sound qualitative research. J Test Eval. 2005;9(2):31–3 SIG Newsletter.
  6. Denzin NK. Lincoln Y S. Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry.3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc; 2008.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dantas, J. A. R., Singh, D., & Lample, M.
Affiliations
Curtin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Dantas, Jaya A. R.
Venue
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published
2020-01-16
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
39-39
ISSN
1471-2393 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3013300663
Cited by
37
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Curtin University of Technology
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
Keywords
maternal health, childbirth location, skilled birth attendance, emergency obstetric care, maternal mortality, rural Uganda, barriers to health care utilization, Millennium Development Goals
MeSH terms
Professionalism, Birth Setting, Adolescent, Adult, Decision Making, Educational Status, Fathers, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Home Childbirth, Humans, Male, Maternal Health Services, Middle Aged, Midwifery, Mothers, Obstetrics, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Pregnancy, Quality of Health Care, Rural Population, Transportation, Uganda, Health Behavior, Health Care Costs, Focus Groups, Qualitative Research, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review