The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Women’s views on accepting COVID-19 vaccination during and after pregnancy, and for their babies: a multi-methods study in the UK
Open accessAbstract
Background: COVID-19 vaccines are advised for pregnant women in the United Kingdom (UK) however COVID-19 vaccine uptake among pregnant women is inadequate. Methods: An online survey and semi-structured interviews were used to investigate pregnant women’s views on COVID-19 vaccine acceptability for themselves when pregnant, not pregnant and for their babies. One thousand one hundred eighty-one women, aged over 16 years, who had been pregnant since 23rd March 2020, were surveyed between 3rd August–11th October 2020. Ten women were interviewed. Results: The majority of women surveyed (81.2%) reported that they would ‘definitely’ or were ‘leaning towards’ accepting a COVID-19 vaccine when not pregnant. COVID-19 vaccine acceptance was significantly lower during pregnancy (62.1%, p < 0.005) and for their babies (69.9%, p < 0.005). Ethnic minority women were twice as likely to reject a COVID-19 vaccine for themselves when not pregnant, pregnant and for their babies compared to women from White ethnic groups ( p < 0.005). Women from lower-income households, aged under 25-years, and from some geographic regions were more likely to reject a COVID-19 vaccine when not pregnant, pregnant and for their babies. Multivariate analysis revealed that income and ethnicity were the main drivers of the observed age and regional differences. Women unvaccinated against pertussis in pregnancy were over four times more likely to reject COVID-19 vaccines when not pregnant, pregnant and for their babies. Thematic analysis of the survey freetext responses and interviews found safety concerns about COVID-19 vaccines were common though wider mistrust in vaccines was also expressed. Trust in vaccines and the health system were also reasons women gave for accepting COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusion: Safety information on COVID-19 vaccines must be clearly communicated to pregnant women to provide reassurance and facilitate informed pregnancy vaccine decisions. Targeted interventions to promote COVID-19 vaccine uptake among ethnic minority and lower-income women may be needed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons
Shimabukuro, T. T., Kim, S. Y., Myers, T. R., Moro, P. L., Oduyebo, T., Panagiotakopoulos, L., Marquez, P. L., Olson, C. K., Liu, R., Chang, K. T., et al. (2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2104983 · Cited by 927
Cited by
COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy: coverage and safety
Blakeway, H., Prasad, S., Kalafat, E., Heath, P. T., Ladhani, S. N., Le Doare, K., Magee, L. A., O’Brien, P., Rezvani, A., von Dadelszen, P., et al. (2022) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2021.08.007 · Cited by 406
Silverio, S. A., Varman, N., Barry, Z., Khazaezadeh, N., Rajasingam, D., Magee, L. A., & Matthew, J. (2023) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-023-17505-7 · Cited by 32
Silverio, S. A., De Backer, K., Dasgupta, T., Torres, O., Easter, A., Khazaezadeh, N., Rajasingam, D., Wolfe, I., Sandall, J., & Magee, L. A. (2022) · eClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101433 · Cited by 26
Mundo Ortiz, A., & Nasri, B. (2024) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.02.045 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Skirrow, H., Barnett, S., Bell, S., Riaposova, L., Mounier-Jack, S., Kampmann, B., & Holder, B.
- Venue
- BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- Published
- 2022-01-14
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-33
- ISSN
- 1471-2393 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4205509968
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 33.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Women’s views on accepting COVID-19 vaccination during and after pregnancy, and for their babies: a multi-methods study in the UK. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12884-021-04321-3
- The paper
- Skirrow, H., Barnett, S., Bell, S., Riaposova, L., Mounier-Jack, S., Kampmann, B., & Holder, B. (2022). Women’s views on accepting COVID-19 vaccination during and after pregnancy, and for their babies: a multi-methods study in the UK. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-04321-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.