Protocol of a randomized controlled trial of the fear of recurrence therapy (FORT) intervention for women with breast or gynecological cancer
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clinically significant levels of fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) affect up to 49% of cancer survivors and are more prevalent among women. FCR is associated with psychological distress, lower quality of life, and increased use of medical resources. Despite its prevalence, FCR is poorly addressed in clinical care. To address this problem, we first developed, and pilot tested a 6-week, 2 h, Cognitive-existential group intervention therapy that targeted FCR in survivors of breast or gynecological cancer. Following the positive outcome of the pilot, we are now testing this approach in a randomized clinical trial (RCT). Goal and hypotheses: This multicenter, prospective RCT aims to test the efficacy of the intervention. The study hypotheses are that, compared to a control group, cancer survivors participating in the intervention (1) will have less FCR, (2) will show more favorable outcomes on the following measures: cancer-specific distress, quality of life, illness uncertainty, intolerance of uncertainty, perceived risk of cancer recurrence, and coping skills. We further postulate that the between-group differences will persist three and 6 months post-intervention. METHODS: Sixteen groups of seven to nine women are being allocated to the intervention or the control group. The control group receives a 6-week, 2 h, structurally equivalent support group. We are recruiting 144 cancer survivors from four hospital sites in three Canadian cities. The sample size was based on the moderate pre/post-test changes found in our pilot study and adjusted to the drop-out rates. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome, FCR, is measured by the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory. Secondary outcomes measured include cancer-specific distress, perceived risk of cancer recurrence, illness uncertainty, intolerance of uncertainty, coping, and quality of life. We use reliable and recognized valid scales. Participants are to complete the questionnaire package at four times: before the first group session (baseline), immediately after the sixth session, and 3 and 6 months post-intervention. ANALYSIS: In the descriptive analysis, comparison of group equivalent baseline variables, identification of confounding/intermediate variables and univariate analysis are planned. Each participant's trajectory is calculated using Generalized Estimating Equation models to determine the time and group effects, after considering the correlation structures of the groups. An intent-to-treat analysis approach may be adopted. DISCUSSION: Our Fear of Recurrence Therapy (FORT) intervention has direct implications for clinical service development to improve the quality of life for patients with breast (BC) and gynecological cancer (GC). Based on our pilot data, we are confident that the FORT intervention can guide the development of effective psychosocial cancer survivorship interventions to reduce FCR and improve psychological functioning among women with BC or GC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dr. Christine Maheu registered the trial with ISRCTN registry (Registration number: ISRCTN83539618, date assigned 03/09/2014).
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Psychological intervention programs addressing FCR have shown positive and promising effects until now.
“Psychological intervention programs addressing FCR have shown positive and promising effects until now (e.g., FORT [84]; Conquer Fear [85], and our Cognitive Behavioral Group Therapy for FCR [25]), but the effectiveness of these interventions has yet to be specifically studied in carriers of the BRCA1/2 genetic mutation.”
From Fear of cancer recurrence in breast cancer survivors carrying a BRCA1 or 2 genetic mutation : a cross-sectional study (2024) · cites this paper as [84]
The effectiveness of FCR interventions has yet to be specifically studied in carriers of the BRCA1/2 genetic mutation.
“Psychological intervention programs addressing FCR have shown positive and promising effects until now (e.g., FORT [84]; Conquer Fear [85], and our Cognitive Behavioral Group Therapy for FCR [25]), but the effectiveness of these interventions has yet to be specifically studied in carriers of the BRCA1/2 genetic mutation.”
From Fear of cancer recurrence in breast cancer survivors carrying a BRCA1 or 2 genetic mutation : a cross-sectional study (2024) · cites this paper as [84]
Several study protocols and feasibility studies have been published during this period.
“and several study protocols and feasibility studies have been published during this period.11-18”
From Effect of Psychological Intervention on Fear of Cancer Recurrence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (2019) · cites this paper as [11]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 83 · Cited by 59
- Authors
- Maheu, C., Lebel, S., Courbasson, C., Lefebvre, M., Singh, M., Bernstein, L. J., Muraca, L., Benea, A., Jolicoeur, L., Harris, C., Ramanakumar, A. V., Ferguson, S., & Sidani, S.
- Affiliations
- University Health Network (CA)
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
- York University (CA)
- Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
- Women's College Hospital (CA)
- Ottawa Hospital (CA)
- McGill University (CA)
- Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Maheu, Christine
- ORCID
- Venue
- BMC Cancer
- Published
- 2016-04-25
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 291-291
- ISSN
- 1471-2407 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4845394
- OpenAlex
- W2343376972
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 83
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 4.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- BMC Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship@McGill (McGill) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship@McGill (McGill) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute (CA) (702589)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Keywords
- fear of cancer recurrence, breast cancer survivors, gynecologic cancer survivors, cancer-specific distress, quality of life, illness uncertainty, intolerance of uncertainty, coping strategies, psychological distress, support groups, intervention efficacy, women's health services
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Fear, Female, Genital Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Stress, Psychological, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Survivors, Kaplan-Meier Estimate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review