Cited by 27Telomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceColorectal Cancer Screening and DetectionGenetic factors in colorectal cancer

Association between telomere length and the risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of observational studies

Open access
Naing, Cho, Aung, Kyan, Lai, Pei Kuan, Mak, Joon Wah·2017·BMC Cancer

Abstract

Human chromosomes are capped and stabilized by telomeres. Telomere length regulates a ‘cellular mitotic clock’ that defines the number of cell divisions and hence, cellular life span. This study aimed to synthesize the evidence on the association between peripheral blood leucocytes (PBL) telomere length and the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). We searched relevant studies in electronic databases. When two or more observational studies reported the same outcome measures, we performed pooled analysis. All the analyses were performed on PBL using PCR. The odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to assess the strength of association. Seven studies (with 8 datasets) were included in this meta-analysis; 3 prospective studies, 3 retrospective studies and 1 study with a separate prospective and retrospective designs. The pooled analysis of 4 prospective studies (summary OR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.77–1.34, I 2:30%) and 4 retrospective studies (summary OR 1.65, 95% CI: 0.96–2.83, I 2:96%) showed no relationship between PBL telomere length and the CRC risk. A subgroup analysis of 2 prospective studies exclusively on females also showed no association between PBL telomere length and the CRC risk (summary OR, 1.17, 95% CI:0.72–1.91, I 2:57%). The current analysis is insufficient to provide evidence on the relationship between PBL telomere length and the risk of CRC. Findings suggest that there may be a complex relationship between PBL telomere length and the CRC risk or discrepancy between genetics, age of patients and clinical studies. Future well powered, large prospective studies on the relationship between telomere length and the risk of CRC, and the investigations of the biologic mechanisms are recommended.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12885-016-2997-3

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 27

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [17]Greenland S Thomas DC Morgenstern H The rare-disease assumption revisited. A critique of estimators of relative risk for case-control studies Am J Epidemiol 1986 124 869 883 3776970
  2. [21]Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. Version [5.3]. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014. http://www.cochrane.org/about-us/citing-our-products.

Authors
Naing, C., Aung, K., Lai, P. K., & Mak, J. W.
Affiliations
IMU University (MY)
Corresponding author
Naing, Cho
Venue
BMC Cancer
Published
2017-01-05
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
24-24
ISSN
1471-2407 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2570337919
Cited by
27
References
52
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
International Medical University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Keywords
telomere length, colorectal cancer, peripheral blood leukocytes, cancer risk, cellular aging, biomarkers, sex differences
MeSH terms
Humans, Colorectal Neoplasms, Odds Ratio, Telomere, Observational Studies as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review