The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Self-monitoring and reminder text messages to increase physical activity in colorectal cancer survivors (Smart Pace): a pilot randomized controlled trial
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Over 1.3 million people live with colorectal cancer in the United States. Physical activity is associated with lower risk of colorectal cancer recurrence and mortality. Interventions are needed to increase physical activity in colorectal cancer survivors. METHODS: We conducted a 2-arm non-blinded pilot randomized controlled trial at the University of California, San Francisco among 42 individuals who had completed curative-intent treatment for colorectal cancer to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a 12-week (84 days) physical activity intervention using a Fitbit Flex™ and daily text messages. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive the intervention with print educational materials or print educational materials alone. We explored the impact of the intervention versus usual care on physical activity using ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometers pre-/post-intervention. RESULTS: We screened 406 individuals and randomized 42 to intervention (n = 21) or control (n = 21) groups. During the 12-week study, the intervention arm wore their Fitbits a median of 74 days [88% of days in study period, interquartile range: 23-83 days] and responded to a median of 34 (out of 46) text messages that asked for a reply (interquartile range: 13-38 text messages). Among the 16 intervention participants who completed the feedback survey, the majority (88%) reported that the intervention motivated them to exercise and that they were satisfied with their experience. No statistically significant difference in change in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity was found from baseline to 12 weeks between arms. CONCLUSION: A 12-week physical activity intervention with a Fitbit and text messages was feasible and acceptable among colorectal cancer patients after curative treatment. Larger studies are needed to determine whether the intervention increases physical activity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT02966054 . Registered 17 November 2016, retrospectively registered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A sensitivity analysis excluding the study by Van Blarigan et al, in which there was an imbalance in MVPA between the control and intervention groups at baseline, showed no significant impact on the overall effect size (P=.92).
“A sensitivity analysis excluding the study by Van Blarigan et al. [103], in which there was an imbalance in MVPA between the control and intervention groups at baseline, showed no significant (P=.92) impact on the overall effect size.”
From Fitbit-based interventions for healthy lifestyle outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as [103]
Three studies showed a decrease in the number of steps.
“Three studies showed a decrease in the number of steps [85,99,103].”
From Fitbit-based interventions for healthy lifestyle outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as [103]
A sensitivity analysis excluding the study by Van Blarigan et al, in which there was an imbalance in steps between the control and intervention groups at baseline, showed similar results (P=.87).
“A sensitivity analysis excluding the study by Van Blarigan et al [103], in which there was an imbalance in steps between the control and intervention groups at baseline, showed similar results (P=.87).”
From Fitbit-based interventions for healthy lifestyle outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as [103]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Blarigan, E. L., Chan, H., Van Loon, K., Kenfield, S. A., Chan, J. M., Mitchell, E., Zhang, L., Paciorek, A., Joseph, G., Laffan, A., Atreya, C. E., Fukuoka, Y., Miaskowski, C., Meyerhardt, J. A., & Venook, A. P.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- BMC Cancer
- Published
- 2019-03-11
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 218-218
- ISSN
- 1471-2407 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6417122
- OpenAlex
- W2947008838
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 16.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMC Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (K07CA197077, K08CA175143)
- National Institutes of Health (KL2TR000143)
- Mount Zion Health Fund
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
- Keywords
- colorectal cancer survivors, physical activity, self-monitoring, SMS reminders, Fitbit, wearable activity trackers, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, feasibility and acceptability, exercise intervention, accelerometry
- MeSH terms
- Fitness Trackers, Cancer Survivors, Adult, Aged, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Pilot Projects, Self Care, Colorectal Neoplasms, Exercise, Text Messaging, Accelerometry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review