Generalized joint hypermobility in childhood is a possible risk for the development of joint pain in adolescence: a cohort study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: There is some evidence that indicates generalized joint hypermobility (GJH) is a risk factor for pain persistence and recurrence in adolescence. However, how early pain develops and whether GJH without pain in childhood is a risk factor for pain development in adolescence is undetermined. The aims for this study were to investigate the association between GJH and development of joint pain and to investigate the current GJH status and physical function in Danish adolescents. METHODS: This was a longitudinal cohort study nested within the Copenhagen Hypermobility Cohort. All children (n = 301) were examined for the exposure, GJH, using the Beighton test at baseline at either 8 or 10 years of age and then re-examined when they reached 14 years of age. The children were categorized into two groups based on their number of positive Beighton tests using different cut points (i.e. GJH4 defined as either < 4 or ≥ 4, GJH5 and GJH6 were similarly defined). The outcome of joint pain was defined as arthralgia as measured by the Brighton criteria from the clinical examination. Other outcome measures of self-reported physical function and objective physical function were also collected. RESULTS: Children with GJH had three times higher risk of developing joint pain in adolescence, although this association did not reach statistical significance (GJH5: 3.00, 95% [0.94-9.60]). At age 14, the adolescents with GJH had significantly lower self-reported physical function (for ADL: GJH4 p = 0.002, GJH5 p = 0.012; for pain during sitting: GJH4 p = 0.002, GJH5 p = 0.018) and had significantly higher body mass index (BMI: GJH5 p = 0.004, GJH6 p = 0.006) than adolescents without GJH. There was no difference in measured physical function. CONCLUSION: This study has suggested a possible link between GJH and joint pain in the adolescent population. GJH was both a predictive and a contributing factor for future pain. Additional studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm our findings.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hormonal changes and onset of puberty are believed to influence joint hypermobility, with an expected increase in prevalence with age among girls and a decrease among boys.
“These factors are believed to influence joint hypermobility, with an expected increase in prevalence with age among girls and a decrease among boys. 5,41”
From No association between joint hypermobility, musculoskeletal pain and neurodevelopmental problems in a school-based sample of 11-year-old children (2025) · cites this paper as [41]
The Background says GJH prevalence varies with age and sex. The Discussion reports that GJH decreased from childhood to follow-up overall, but it does not attribute changes to puberty or hormones, or state that prevalence is expected to rise with age among girls while falling among boys. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredWhile some longitudinal studies seem to support an association between GJH and MSP, they have not provided evidence for GJH being a causative factor for MSP.
“While some longitudinal studies seem to support an association between GJH and MSP, they have not provided evidence for GJH being a causative factor for MSP (El-Metwally et al., 2004; Tobias et al., 2013; Sohrbeck-Nohr et al., 2014).”
From Prevalence of generalized joint hypermobility, musculoskeletal injuries, and chronic musculoskeletal pain among American university students (2019) · cites this paper as Sohrbeck-Nohr et al., 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 45
- Authors
- Sohrbeck-Nøhr, O., Kristensen, J. H., Boyle, E., Remvig, L., & Juul-Kristensen, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern Denmark (DK)
- Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
- ORCID
- Boyle, Eleanor
- Venue
- BMC Pediatrics
- Published
- 2014-12
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 302-302
- ISSN
- 1471-2431 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4305244
- OpenAlex
- W2105650105
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 2.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMC Pediatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion)
- TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
- Keywords
- generalized joint hypermobility, joint pain, adolescence, childhood, physical function, body mass index, risk factors for pain
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Joint Instability, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Recurrence, Risk Factors, Odds Ratio, Range of Motion, Articular, Arthralgia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review