Cited by 27Surgical site infection preventionAntibiotic Use and ResistanceInfection Control in Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in children: a mixed method study on healthcare professionals attitudes

Open access
The Apache Study Group, Giusti, Angela, Spila Alegiani, Stefania, Ciofi degli Atti, Marta Luisa, Colaceci, Sofia, Raschetti, Roberto, Arace, Pasquale, Spiazzi, Raffaele, Raponi, Massimiliano·2016·BMC Pediatrics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Qualitative and quantitative research investigating determinants of adherence to clinical guidelines (GLs) on surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) are scarce. We conducted a mixed-method study aimed at investigating barriers and at describing attitudes of healthcare professionals (HCPs) regarding SAP in three Italian children's hospitals. METHODS: The study comprised two sequential phases: 1) collection of qualitative data through focus groups; 2) conduction of a survey on HCPs attitudes towards SAP. Focus groups were carried out in each hospital with a theoretical convenience sample of 10-15 HCPs. Categorical analysis was conducted. Emerging categories and additional topics derived by literature search were used to develop the survey questionnaire, which included 13 questions expressed through a 4-point Likert scale. Members of surgical teams were invited by e-mail to fill in the questionnaire. We summed up the points assigned to each 4-point Likert scale response and calculated a cumulative score expressing overall concordance to expected HCPs attitudes on SAP. We conducted univariate and multivariate analysis to evaluate the relationship among characteristics of respondents and concordance with expected attitudes. RESULTS: The main categories identified in the qualitative phase included determinants of general adherence to GLs (e.g., relevance of clinical judgment), individual determinants (e.g., poor knowledge on hospital data) and organizational/structural determinants (e.g., patient flows). A total of 357 HCPs participated in the survey (response rate: 82.1%). Among respondents, 75% reported that SAP should be performed with first or second-generation cephalosporins, 44% that 2-3 days of antibiotic administration are useful as a precaution after surgery, 32% that SAP is needed for all surgical procedures. At multivariate analysis, professional category (physicians vs nurses; OR: 3.31; 95%CI: 1.88-5.82), and hospital (hospital 1 and 2 vs hospital 3; ORs: 2.79, 95%CI: 1.22-6.36; 2.40, 95%CI: 1.30-4.43, respectively) were significantly and independently associated with higher concordance with expected attitudes on SAP. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study were useful to identify obstacles to appropriate SAP use in children. In our setting, findings support that a quality-improvement intervention should take into account local contexts, with development of hospital policies, education on SAP recommendations, and dissemination of data on adherence to recommendations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12887-016-0739-y

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Determinants of the individual SAP behavior. Map of the emerging categories
Fig. 1 Determinants of the individual SAP behavior. Map of the emerging categoriesCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
The Apache Study Group, Giusti, A., Spila Alegiani, S., Ciofi degli Atti, M. L., Colaceci, S., Raschetti, R., Arace, P., Spiazzi, R., & Raponi, M.
Affiliations
  • Istituto Superiore di Sanità (IT)
  • Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia (IT)
  • Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital (IT)
Venue
BMC Pediatrics
Published
2016-12
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
203-203
ISSN
1471-2431 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2560272401
Cited by
27
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Pediatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Italian Agency of Drugs (AIFA) (FARM9PJNAJ)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical site infection prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
Keywords
surgical antibiotic prophylaxis, children, clinician attitudes, clinical guideline adherence, barriers to guideline adherence, pediatric surgery, cephalosporins, duration of antibiotic prophylaxis, professional role differences, hospital policy, quality improvement, children's hospitals, Italy, patient flow, surgical team, physicians, appropriateness of antibiotic use
MeSH terms
Anesthesiologists, Adult, Aged, Attitude of Health Personnel, Child, Female, Hospitals, Pediatric, Humans, Italy, Male, Middle Aged, Nurses, Preoperative Care, Focus Groups, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Antibiotic Prophylaxis, Guideline Adherence, Qualitative Research, Inappropriate Prescribing, Surgeons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review