Healthcare workers’ views on the use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in neonates: A qualitative study in Andhra Pradesh, India
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) is a form of non-invasive ventilatory support which is increasingly used in low- and middle-income countries to treat neonates with acute respiratory distress. However, it may be harmful if used incorrectly. We aimed to explore the experiences of doctors and nurses using CPAP in neonatal units in India and their views on enablers and barriers to implementation of CPAP. METHODS: Participants from 15 neonatal units across Andhra Pradesh were identified through purposive sampling. Eighteen in-depth interviews (IDI) with doctors and eight focus group discussions (FGD) with 51 nurses were conducted. Data were analysed thematically using the framework approach. RESULTS: Common structural factors that limit the use of CPAP include shortages of staff, consumables and equipment, and problems with regard to the organisation of neonatal units in both district hospitals and medical colleges. This meant that CPAP was often not available for babies who were identified to need CPAP, or that CPAP use was not perceived to be of the highest quality. Providing care under constrained circumstances left staff feeling powerless to provide good quality care for neonates with acute respiratory distress. Despite this, staff were enthusiastic about the use of CPAP and its potential to save lives. CPAP use was mostly perceived as technically easier to provide than ventilation and allowed nurses to provide advanced neonatal care, independently of doctors. CONCLUSIONS: Doctors and nurses embraced CPAP use but identified barriers to implementation which will need to be addressed in order not to impact on safety and quality of care. Ensuring a supportive and enabling environment is in place will be crucial if CPAP is to be scaled-up more widely.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Our findings on constraints resulting from inadequate human resources resonate with a previous qualitative study on health care worker perspectives on bubble CPAP in India where although CPAP was accepted by health care workers, its use was impeded by shortages of staff, along with equipment.
“Our findings on constraints resulting from inadequate human resources resonates with a previous qualitative study on health care worker perspectives on bubble CPAP in India where although CPAP was accepted by health care workers, its use was impeded by shortages of staff, along with equipment [36].”
From Barriers and enablers of implementing bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP): Perspectives of health professionals in Malawi (2020) · cites this paper as [36]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 20 · Cited by 20
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [9]WHO Recommendations on interventions to improve preterm birth outcomes 2015 Geneva World Health Organization 26447264
- [21]Government of India Indian Newborn Action Plan 2014 New Delhi Press Information Bureau, Government of India
- [24]Government of India 602 Special Newborn Care Units (SNCUs) operational in the country 2015 New Delhi Press Information Bureau, Government of India
- Authors
- Dewez, J. E., Chellani, H., Nangia, S., Metsis, K., Smith, H., Mathai, M., & van den Broek, N.
- Affiliations
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (GB)
- Safdarjang Hospital (IN)
- Lady Hardinge Medical College (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Mathai, Matthews
- Venue
- BMC Pediatrics
- Published
- 2018-11-06
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 347-347
- ISSN
- 1471-2431 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6220518
- OpenAlex
- W2899634825
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 1.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BMC Pediatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Greater South Information System
- Funders
- World Health Organization (2016/613341-0)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
- Keywords
- continuous positive airway pressure, non-invasive ventilation, healthcare workers' perspectives, implementation barriers, staff shortage, quality of care, low- and middle-income countries, Andhra Pradesh
- MeSH terms
- Academic Medical Centers, Attitude of Health Personnel, Equipment and Supplies, Hospital, Female, Hospitals, District, Humans, India, Infant, Newborn, Intensive Care Units, Neonatal, Interviews as Topic, Male, Medical Staff, Hospital, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, Focus Groups, Qualitative Research, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review