Insomnia and the risk of depression: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies
Open accessAbstract
Observational studies suggest that insomnia might be associated with an increased risk of depression with inconsistent results. This study aimed at conducting a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies to evaluate the association between insomnia and the risk of depression. Relevant cohort studies were comprehensively searched from the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases (up to October 2014) and from the reference lists of retrieved articles. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled risk estimates and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). The I 2 statistic was used to assess the heterogeneity and potential sources of heterogeneity were assessed with meta-regression. The potential publication bias was explored by using funnel plots, Egger’s test, and Duval and Tweedie trim-and-fill methods. Thirty-four cohort studies involving 172,077 participants were included in this meta-analysis with an average follow-up period of 60.4 months (ranging from 3.5 to 408). Statistical analysis suggested a positive relationship between insomnia and depression, the pooled RR was 2.27 (95 % CI: 1.89–2.71), and a high heterogeneity was observed (I 2 = 92.6 %, P < 0.001). Visual inspection of the funnel plot revealed some asymmetry. The Egger’s test identified evidence of substantial publication bias (P <0.05), but correction for this bias using trim-and-fill method did not alter the combined risk estimates. This meta-analysis indicates that insomnia is significantly associated with an increased risk of depression, which has implications for the prevention of depression in non-depressed individuals with insomnia symptoms.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Insomnia significantly increases risk for future depression (RR=2.27, 95% CI 1.89-2.71).
“a large prospective meta-analysis of data from 172,007 individuals in 34 examinations of 'insomnia' (primarily identified from night-time symptoms) found that it significantly increased the risk for future depression (RR=2.27, 95% CI: 1.89-2.71, I 2 =92.6%) 72 .”
From A meta-review of "lifestyle psychiatry": the role of exercise, smoking, diet and sleep in the prevention and treatment of mental disorders (2020) · cites this paper as [72]
The Results (Quantitative synthesis) report the claimed pooled RR of 2.27 (95% CI 1.89–2.71) and I² of 92.6%. The Abstract (Results) says the meta-analysis included 34 cohort studies and 172,077 participants, not the 172,007 stated in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredInsomnia has been identified as a precursor to the development of full clinical syndromes.
“and that insomnia has been identified as a precursor to the development of full clinical syndromes (71)”
From Predicting Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety Using Smartphone and Wearable Data (2021) · cites this paper as [71]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 70 · Cited by 626
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [6]Services USDoHaH. Report of the 2005 White House Conference on aging. The booming dynamics of aging: from awareness to action. Washington, DC; 2006. http://nicoa.org/wpcontent/uploads/2014/05/2005-WHCOA-Final-Report.pdf.
- [57]American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR). American Psychiatric; 2000.
- Authors
- Li, L., Wu, C., Gan, Y., Qu, X., & Lu, Z.
- Affiliations
- Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University (CN)
- Gannan Medical University (CN)
- Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
- Hangzhou Normal University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Lu, Zuxun
- Venue
- BMC Psychiatry
- Published
- 2016-11-05
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 375-375
- ISSN
- 1471-244X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5097837
- OpenAlex
- W2548913358
- Cited by
- 626
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 79 · 2025: 84 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 88 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 16
- FWCI
- 2.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- BMC Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- insomnia, depression, depression risk, prospective cohort, publication bias, heterogeneity, depression prevention
- MeSH terms
- Depression, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review