Cited by 43Intimate Partner and Family ViolencePosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMental Health Treatment and Access

Feasibility trial of a scalable psychological intervention for women affected by urban adversity and gender-based violence in Nairobi

Open access
Dawson, Katie S., Schafer, Alison, Anjuri, Dorothy, Ndogoni, Lincoln, Musyoki, Caroline, Sijbrandij, Marit, van Ommeren, Mark, Bryant, Richard A.·2016·BMC Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Living in conditions of chronic adversity renders many women more vulnerable to experiencing gender-based violence (GBV). In addition to GBV's physical and social consequences, the psychological effects can be pervasive. Access to evidence-based psychological interventions that seek to support the mental health of women affected by such adversity is rare in low- and middle-income countries. METHODS: The current study evaluates a brief evidence-informed psychological intervention developed by the World Health Organization for adults impacted by adversity (Problem Management Plus; PM+). A feasibility randomised control trial (RCT) was conducted to inform a fully powered trial. Community health workers delivered the intervention to 70 women residing in three peri-urban settings in Nairobi, Kenya. Women, among whom 80% were survivors of GBV (N = 56), were randomised to receive five sessions of either PM+ (n = 35) by community health workers or enhanced treatment as usual (ETAU; n = 35). RESULTS: PM+ was not associated with any adverse events. Although the study was not powered to identify effects and accordingly did not identify effects on the primary outcome measure of general psychological distress, women survivors of adversity, including GBV, who received PM+ displayed greater reductions in posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms following treatment than those receiving ETAU. CONCLUSIONS: This feasibility study suggests that PM+ delivered by lay health workers is an acceptable and safe intervention to reach women experiencing common mental disorders and be inclusive for those affected by GBV and can be studied in a RCT in this setting. The study sets the stage for a fully powered, definitive controlled trial to assess this potentially effective intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12614001291673 , 10/12/2014, retrospectively registered during the recruitment phase.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12888-016-1117-x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 43

Authors
Dawson, K. S., Schafer, A., Anjuri, D., Ndogoni, L., Musyoki, C., Sijbrandij, M., van Ommeren, M., & Bryant, R. A.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Bryant, Richard A.
Venue
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2016-11-18
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
410-410
ISSN
1471-244X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2554147083
Cited by
43
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
  • Grand Challenges Canada
  • World Vision Australia
  • World Vision Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
Problem Management Plus, psychological intervention, gender-based violence, women survivors, community health workers, lay health workers, post-traumatic stress disorder, psychological distress, common mental disorders, feasibility, Nairobi
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Kenya, Psychotherapy, Urban Population, Violence, Women, Survivors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review