Cited by 102Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPsychiatric care and mental health servicesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Effectiveness of brief psychological interventions for suicidal presentations: a systematic review

Open access
McCabe, Rose, Garside, Ruth, Backhouse, Amy, Xanthopoulou, Penny·2018·BMC Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Every year, more than 800,000 people worldwide die by suicide. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the effectiveness of brief psychological interventions in addressing suicidal thoughts and behaviour in healthcare settings. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, systematic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and PsycINFO databases. A predefined search strategy was used. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts followed by full texts against predefined inclusion criteria. Backward and forward citation tracking of included papers was conducted. Quality appraisal was conducted using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Randomized Controlled Trials and the CASP tool for randomised controlled trials. The small number and heterogeneity of studies did not allow for meta-analysis to be conducted. A narrative synthesis was conducted. RESULTS: Four controlled studies of brief psychological interventions were included, conducted in Switzerland, the U.S. and across low and middle-income countries. Three studies were conducted with adults and one with adolescents. All studies were judged to be at low risk of bias. All of the interventions were implemented with patients after attending emergency departments and involved 3412 participants. The main outcomes were suicide, suicide attempts, suicidal ideation, depression and hospitalization. The components of the interventions were early therapeutic engagement, information provision, safety planning and follow-up contact for at least 12 months. The interventions drew to, different degrees, on psychological theory and techniques. Two trials that measured suicidal ideation found no impact. Two studies showed fewer suicide attempts, one showed fewer suicides and one found an effect on depression. CONCLUSIONS: Although the evidence base is small, brief psychological interventions appear to be effective in reducing suicide and suicide attempts. All studies to date have been conducted with people who had attended the ED but the interventions could potentially be adopted for inpatient and other outpatient settings. Early engagement and therapeutic intervention based on psychological theories of suicidal behaviour, sustained in follow-up contacts, may be particularly beneficial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42015025867.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12888-018-1663-5

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous meta-analyses did not report on the effectiveness of SPTIs specifically.

    “Although the latter have made an important contribution to the literature, they did not include all published trials on SPTIs, and did not report on the effectiveness of SPTIs specifically.7,8”

    From Safety planning-type interventions for suicide prevention: meta-analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Methods > Analysis section (page unavailable) says this review did not conduct a meta-analysis because the studies were too heterogeneous, so it provides no pooled SPTI-specific estimate. However, Results > Effectiveness of interventions reports outcomes for brief psychological interventions, including suicide and suicide attempts. The paper therefore supports the narrower point about no meta-analytic estimate, not an unqualified claim that it did not report intervention effectiveness. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Previous meta-analyses of studies including SPTIs focused on brief interventions more broadly.

    “whereas meta-analyses of studies that included SPTIs have focused on brief interventions more broadly.7,8”

    From Safety planning-type interventions for suicide prevention: meta-analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Results (Characteristics of interventions; page unavailable) show that the review covered several brief interventions, including one with safety planning and telephone follow-up. But the Abstract (Methods; page unavailable) explicitly says the studies could not be combined in a meta-analysis and were synthesized narratively. Calling this source a meta-analysis is therefore unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A recent systematic review by McCabe et al on brief psychological interventions for suicide prevention suggested that such interventions may alter behaviours of individuals at risk of suicide, but their level of cognitive distress remains unaffected.

    “Such a supposition is supported by a recent systematic review by McCabe et al on brief psychological interventions for suicide prevention, which suggested that such interventions may alter behaviours of individuals at risk of suicide, but their level of cognitive distress remains unaffected.7”
  • Previous meta-analyses did not include all published trials on SPTIs.

    “Although the latter have made an important contribution to the literature, they did not include all published trials on SPTIs, and did not report on the effectiveness of SPTIs specifically.7,8”

    From Safety planning-type interventions for suicide prevention: meta-analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Methods (Search and information sources) say the authors checked references of previous systematic reviews, and the Results (Study selection) report four included studies. Neither passage compares those studies with the trials included in previous meta-analyses, so our copy does not establish whether those analyses omitted published SPTI trials. The paper itself used a narrative synthesis rather than a meta-analysis. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Safety plans appear to support behavior change for suicide prevention but may not impact levels of cognitive distress related to suicidal ideation.

    “Safety plans appear to support behavior change for suicide prevention but may not impact levels of cognitive distress related to suicidal ideation.56”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 102

Authors
McCabe, R., Garside, R., Backhouse, A., & Xanthopoulou, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • Royal Cornwall Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Xanthopoulou, Penny
Venue
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2018-05-03
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
120-120
ISSN
1471-244X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2803471393
Cited by
102
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (PB-PG-0408-16279)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
brief psychological intervention, suicide prevention, suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, suicide, emergency department, safety planning, follow-up contact, depression, healthcare settings
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Crisis Intervention, Humans, Suicide, Treatment Outcome, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review