The validity of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) as screening instrument with Kurdish and Arab displaced populations living in the Kurdistan region of Iraq
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL) is a valid and reliable self-report measure for the assessment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Recently the PCL was updated according to the DSM-5 criteria for PTSD. So far only a few studies have examined the psychometric properties of the PCL-5, and all of these are restricted to populations living in industrialized countries. The aim of this study was to determine the psychometric properties and diagnostic utility of the PCL-5 as a screening instrument for war-affected displaced Kurdish and Arab populations. The specific goal was to determine a contextually valid cut-off score for a probable diagnosis of PTSD. METHODS: The PCL-5 was translated into Arabic and two Kurdish dialects. Trained interviewers administered these translations as assisted self-reports to 206 adults living in camps for displaced people in Iraq, together with depression and war-exposure instruments. Two weeks later, 98 randomly chosen subjects were reassessed by expert clinical psychologists. In the absence of a gold-standard instrument with proven validity in this context, the expert interviewers applied the PCL-5 items in the form of a clinical interview and used a DSM-5-algorithm to determine a diagnosis of PTSD. Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) were performed to determine a valid cutoff-score. RESULTS: The internal consistency of the PCL-5 was high (alpha = .85) and the instrument showed an adequate convergent validity. Using the cut-off score of 23, the PCL-5 achieved the optimal balance of sensitivity and specificity (area under the curve = .82, p < .001; sensitivity = .82, specificity = .70). CONCLUSIONS: Given that the comparison of the two assessments included both a re-test interval and validation by different interviewers, our results indicate that the PCL-5 can be recommended as an assessment and screening instrument for Kurdish and Arab populations.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The PCL-5 has solid reliability and validity in both non-refugee and refugee populations.
“Research has shown PCL-5 to be psychometrically sound with solid reliability and validity in both non-refugee (Blevins et al., 2015) and refugee populations (Ibrahim et al., 2018).”
From Investigating the potential of a novel internet-based cognitive behavioural intervention for Dari and Farsi speaking refugee youth: A feasibility study (2022) · cites this paper as Ibrahim et al., 2018
A validity study of Syrian and Iraqi refugees observed that a score of 23 is the optimal cutoff to indicate probable PTSD diagnosis.
“A validity study of Syrian and Iraqi refugees observed that a score of 23 is the optimal cutoff to indicate probable PTSD diagnosis [42].”
From Effectiveness of a brief group behavioral intervention for common mental disorders in Syrian refugees in Jordan: a randomized controlled trial (2022) · cites this paper as [42]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 277
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [11]Norris FH Hamblen JL Wilson JP Keane TM Standardized self-report measures of civilian trauma and PTSD Assess Psychol trauma PTSD 2004 2 New York, NY, US Guilford Press 63 102
- [13]Weathers FW Litz BT Herman DS Huska JA Keane TM Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist. PTSD Checkl Reliab validity, diagnostic Util 1993 San Antonio, TX Paper presented at the 9th Annual Conference of the ISTSS
- [21]Hesbacher PT Rickels K Morris RJ Newman H Rosenfeld H Psychiatric illness in family practice J Clin Psychiatry 1980 41 6 10 7351399
- Authors
- Ibrahim, H., Ertl, V., Catani, C., Ismail, A. A., & Neuner, F.
- Affiliations
- Bielefeld University (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Ibrahim, Hawkar
- Venue
- BMC Psychiatry
- Published
- 2018-08-16
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 259-259
- ISSN
- 1471-244X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6097219
- OpenAlex
- W2886397543
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 19.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BMC Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Publication Server of the Catholic University Eichstätt-Ingolstadt (Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt) (submittedVersion)
- Publikationen an der Universität Bielefeld (Universität Bielefeld) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Volkswagen Foundation (91474)
- Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (91562643)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- PCL-5, post-traumatic stress disorder, screening tool, psychometric validation, cut-off values, Kurdish refugees, Arab refugees, internally displaced persons, Iraqi Kurdistan, Arabic translation, Kurdish dialects, war exposure, depression
- MeSH terms
- War Exposure, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Iraq, Language, Male, Psychometrics, Sensitivity and Specificity, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Translations, Reproducibility of Results, Arabs, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Checklist, Self Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review