Cited by 277Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMigration, Health and TraumaPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The validity of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) as screening instrument with Kurdish and Arab displaced populations living in the Kurdistan region of Iraq

Open access
Ibrahim, Hawkar, Ertl, Verena, Catani, Claudia, Ismail, Azad Ali, Neuner, Frank·2018·BMC Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL) is a valid and reliable self-report measure for the assessment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Recently the PCL was updated according to the DSM-5 criteria for PTSD. So far only a few studies have examined the psychometric properties of the PCL-5, and all of these are restricted to populations living in industrialized countries. The aim of this study was to determine the psychometric properties and diagnostic utility of the PCL-5 as a screening instrument for war-affected displaced Kurdish and Arab populations. The specific goal was to determine a contextually valid cut-off score for a probable diagnosis of PTSD. METHODS: The PCL-5 was translated into Arabic and two Kurdish dialects. Trained interviewers administered these translations as assisted self-reports to 206 adults living in camps for displaced people in Iraq, together with depression and war-exposure instruments. Two weeks later, 98 randomly chosen subjects were reassessed by expert clinical psychologists. In the absence of a gold-standard instrument with proven validity in this context, the expert interviewers applied the PCL-5 items in the form of a clinical interview and used a DSM-5-algorithm to determine a diagnosis of PTSD. Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) were performed to determine a valid cutoff-score. RESULTS: The internal consistency of the PCL-5 was high (alpha = .85) and the instrument showed an adequate convergent validity. Using the cut-off score of 23, the PCL-5 achieved the optimal balance of sensitivity and specificity (area under the curve = .82, p < .001; sensitivity = .82, specificity = .70). CONCLUSIONS: Given that the comparison of the two assessments included both a re-test interval and validation by different interviewers, our results indicate that the PCL-5 can be recommended as an assessment and screening instrument for Kurdish and Arab populations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12888-018-1839-z

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 277

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [11]Norris FH Hamblen JL Wilson JP Keane TM Standardized self-report measures of civilian trauma and PTSD Assess Psychol trauma PTSD 2004 2 New York, NY, US Guilford Press 63 102
  2. [13]Weathers FW Litz BT Herman DS Huska JA Keane TM Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist. PTSD Checkl Reliab validity, diagnostic Util 1993 San Antonio, TX Paper presented at the 9th Annual Conference of the ISTSS
  3. [21]Hesbacher PT Rickels K Morris RJ Newman H Rosenfeld H Psychiatric illness in family practice J Clin Psychiatry 1980 41 6 10 7351399

Authors
Ibrahim, H., Ertl, V., Catani, C., Ismail, A. A., & Neuner, F.
Affiliations
Bielefeld University (DE)
Corresponding author
Ibrahim, Hawkar
Venue
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2018-08-16
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
259-259
ISSN
1471-244X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2886397543
Cited by
277
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2
FWCI
19.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Publication Server of the Catholic University Eichstätt-Ingolstadt (Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt) (submittedVersion)
  • Publikationen an der Universität Bielefeld (Universität Bielefeld) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Volkswagen Foundation (91474)
  • Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (91562643)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
PCL-5, post-traumatic stress disorder, screening tool, psychometric validation, cut-off values, Kurdish refugees, Arab refugees, internally displaced persons, Iraqi Kurdistan, Arabic translation, Kurdish dialects, war exposure, depression
MeSH terms
War Exposure, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Iraq, Language, Male, Psychometrics, Sensitivity and Specificity, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Translations, Reproducibility of Results, Arabs, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Checklist, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review