Cited by 9Psychiatric care and mental health servicesSchizophrenia research and treatmentHistorical Psychiatry and Medical Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Rehospitalisation rates after long-term follow-up of patients with severe mental illness admitted for more than one year: a systematic review

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of studies on the outcomes of long-term hospitalisation of individuals with severe mental illness, considering readmission rates as the primary outcome. Methods: Studies considered were those in which participants were aged between 18 and 64 years with severe mental illness; exposure to psychiatric hospitals or wards was long-term (more than one year); primary outcomes were readmission rates; secondary outcomes were duration of readmission, employment, schooling, and social participation; and the study design was either observational or interventional with a randomised controlled trial (RCT) design. Relevant studies were searched using MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL, and the Japan Medical Abstract Society. The final search was conducted on 1 February 2022. The risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions was used to assess the methodological quality. A descriptive literature review is also conducted. Results: Of the 11,999 studies initially searched, three cohort studies (2,293 participants) met the eligibility criteria. The risk of bias in these studies was rated as critical or serious. The 1–10 years readmission rate for patients with schizophrenia who had been hospitalised for more than one year ranged from 33 to 55%. The average of readmission durations described in the two studies was 70.5 ± 95.6 days per year (in the case of a 7.5-year follow-up) and 306 ± 399 days (in the case of a 3–8-year follow-up). None of the studies reported other outcomes defined in this study. Conclusions: The readmission rates in the included studies varied. Differences in the follow-up period or the intensity of community services may have contributed to this variability. In countries preparing to implement de-institutionalisation, highly individualised community support should be designed to avoid relocation to residential services under supervision. The length of stay for readmissions was shorter than that for index admissions. The results also imply that discharge to the community contributes to improved clinical outcomes such as improved social functioning. The validity of retaining patients admitted because of the risk of rehospitalisation was considered low. Future research directions have also been discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12888-023-05290-x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 9

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Bland RC, Orn H. 14-year outcome in early schizophrenia. Asia Pac Psychiatry. 1978;58:327–38.
  2. Chung W, Chang HS, Oh SM, Yoon CW. Factors associated with long-stay status in patients with schizophrenia: an analysis of national databases covering the entire Korean population. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2013;59:207–16. · DOI
  3. Daund M, Sonavane S, Shrivastava A, Desousa A, Kumawat S. Mental hospitals in India: reforms for the future. Indian J Psychiatry. 2018;60:S239–47. · DOI
  4. Desai MM, Rosenheck RA. Trends in discharge disposition, mortality, and service use among long-stay psychiatric patients in the 1990s. Psychiatr Serv. 2003;54:542–8. · DOI
  5. Eseaton PO, Enosolease AU, Ijioma O, Ugoh AC, Onyeaka H, Oladunjoye AF, Anugwom G, Osiezagha K, Edigin E. Severe major depressive disorder readmissions: a national United States population study. J Affect Disord. 2023;15:177–80. · DOI
  6. Francis VM, Vesey P, Lowe G. The closure of a long-stay psychiatric hospital: a longitudinal study of patients’ behaviour [London]. Times Lit Suppl. 1994;29:184–9.
  7. Higuchi M, Hayashi N. A study of the readmission of schizophrenic patients after long-term hospitalization. Seishin Igaku. 1996;38:245–51.
  8. Hudson CG. Five-year rehospitalization experience of a state-wide cohort of persons with schizophrenia. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2019;54:861–70. · DOI
  9. Ito H, Sederer LI. Mental health services reform in Japan. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 1999;7:208–15. · DOI
  10. Kunitoh N. From hospital to the community: the influence of de-institutionalization on discharged long-stay psychiatric patients. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2013;67:384–96. · DOI
  11. Mascayano F, Haselden M, Corbeil T, Wall MM, Tang F, Essock SM, Frimpong E, Goldman ML, Radigan M, Schneider M, Wang R, Dixon LB, Olfson M, Smith TE. Patient-, hospital-, and system-level factors associated with 30-day readmission after a psychiatric hospitalization. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2023;210:741–6. · DOI
  12. Okin RL, Borus JF, Baer L, Jones AL. Long-term outcome of state hospital patients discharged into structured community residential settings. Psychiatr Serv. 1995;46:73–8. · DOI
  13. Padmakar A, de Wit EE, Mary S, Regeer E, Bunders-Aelen J, Regeer B. Supported housing as a recovery option for long-stay patients with severe mental illness in a psychiatric hospital in South India: learning from an innovative de-hospitalization process. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0230074. · DOI
  14. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hrobjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Revista española de cardiología (English ed). 2021;74:790–9.
  15. Rosenblatt A, Mayer JE. The recidivism of mental patients: a review of past studies. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1974;44:697–706. · DOI
  16. Shepherd M, Watt D, Falloon I, Smeeton N. The natural history of schizophrenia: a five-year follow-up study of outcome and prediction in a representative sample of schizophrenics. Psychol Med Monogr Suppl. 1989;15:1–46. · DOI
  17. Solomon P, Doll W. The varieties of readmission: the case against the use of recidivism rates as a measure of program effectiveness. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1979;49:230–9. · DOI
  18. Suri T, Suri S, Poremski D, Fang TA. Vitamin D deficiency in long-term hospitalisation psychiatric wards in an equatorial nation. Asia Pac Psychiatry. 2020;12:e12390. · DOI
  19. Trieman N, Leff J, Glover G. Outcome of long stay psychiatric patients resettled in the community: a prospective cohort study. BMJ. 1999;319:13–6. · DOI
  20. Vigod SN, Kurdyak PA, Dennis CL, Leszcz T, Taylor VH, Blumberger DM, Seitz DP. Transitional interventions to reduce early psychiatric readmissions in adults: systematic review. Br J Psychiatry. 2013;202:187–94. · DOI
  21. Winkler P, Barrett B, McCrone P, Csemy L, Janous̆kova M, Hoschl C. Deinstitutionalised patients, homelessness and imprisonment: systematic review. Br J Psychiatry. 2016;208:421–8. · DOI
  22. Winkler P, Mlada K, Krupchanka D, Agius M, Ray MK, Hoschl C. Long-term hospitalizations for schizophrenia in the Czech Republic 1998–2012. Schizophr Res. 2016;175:180–5. · DOI
  23. Winkler P, Krupchanka D, Roberts T, Kondratova L, Machu V, Hoschl C, Sartorius N, Van Voren R, Aizberg O, Bitter I, Cerga-Pashoja A, Deljkovic A, Fanaj N, Germanavicius A, Hinkov H, Hovsepyan A, Ismayilov FN, Ivezic SS, Jarema M, Jordanova V, Kukic S, Makhashvili N, Sarotar BN, Plevachuk O, Smirnova D, Voinescu BI, Vrublevska J, Thornicroft G. A blind spot on the global mental health map: a scoping review of 25 years’ development of mental health care for people with severe mental illnesses in central and eastern Europe. Lancet Psychiatry. 2017;4:634–42. · DOI
  24. World Health Organization. Mental Health Atlas 2020. Geneva: WHO; 2021.
  25. Wu J, He X, Liu L, Ye W, Montgomery W, Xue H, McCombs JS. Health care resource use and direct medical costs for patients with schizophrenia in Tianjin, People’s Republic of China. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015;11:983–90. · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Sato, S., Nakanishi, M., Ogawa, M., Abe, M., Yasuma, N., Kono, T., Igarashi, M., Iwanaga, M., Kawaguchi, T., & Yamaguchi, S.
Affiliations
  • National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (JP)
  • Tohoku University (JP)
Corresponding author
Sato, Sayaka
Venue
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2023-10-27
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
788-788
ISSN
1471-244X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387972229
Cited by
9
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3
FWCI
0.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Health Labour Sciences Research Grant, Japan (19GC1015)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
Keywords
hospital readmission, severe mental illness, schizophrenia, readmission rates, deinstitutionalization, community support services, social functioning, employment effects, social participation (health and rehabilitation)
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Mental Disorders, Follow-Up Studies, Hospitalization, Humans, Length of Stay, Middle Aged, Patient Readmission, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review