Pathways to experienced coercion during psychiatric admission: a network analysis
Open accessAbstract
Background: In mental health care, experienced coercion, also known as perceived coercion, is defined as the patient’s subjective experience of being submitted to coercion. Besides formal coercion, many other factors have been identified as potentially affecting the experience of being coerced. This study aimed to explore the interplay between these factors and to provide new insights into how they lead to experienced coercion. Methods: Cross-sectional network analysis was performed on data collected from 225 patients admitted to six psychiatric hospitals. Thirteen variables were selected and included in the analyses. A Gaussian Graphical Model (GGM) using Spearman’s rank-correlation method and EBICglasso regularisation was estimated. Centrality indices of strength and expected influence were computed. To evaluate the robustness of the estimated parameters, both edge-weight accuracy and centrality stability were investigated. Results: The estimated network was densely connected. Formal coercion was only weakly associated with both experienced coercion at admission and during hospital stay. Experienced coercion at admission was most strongly associated with the patients’ perceived level of implication in the decision-making process. Experienced humiliation and coercion during hospital stay, the most central node in the network, was found to be most strongly related to the interpersonal separation that patients perceived from staff, the level of coercion perceived upon admission and their satisfaction with the decision taken and the level of information received. Conclusions: Reducing formal coercion may not be sufficient to effectively reduce patients’ feeling of being coerced. Different factors seemed indeed to come into play and affect experienced coercion at different stages of the hospitalisation process. Interventions aimed at reducing experienced coercion and its negative effects should take these stage-specific elements into account and propose tailored strategies to address them.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Informal coercion at admission was not linked to perceived coercion.
“Similarly, informal coercion at admission was not linked to perceived coercion [158].”
From Factors Associated with Perceived Coercion in Adults Receiving Psychiatric Care: A Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as [158]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 80 · Cited by 4
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [43]Blanken TF, Isvoranu AM, Epskamp S. Chapter 7. Estimating network structures using model selection. In: Isvoranu AM, Epskamp S, Waldorp LJ, Borsboom D, editors. Network psychometrics with R: a guide for behavioral and social scientists. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2022.
- [74]Sampogna G, Luciano M, Del Vecchio V, et al. Perceived Coercion among patients admitted in Psychiatric wards: Italian results of the EUNOMIA Study. Front Psychiatry. 2019;10(316):316. 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00316. 31164841 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00316 PMC6536685 · DOI · Paper page
- Authors
- Silva, B., Morandi, S., Bachelard, M., Bonsack, C., & Golay, P.
- Affiliations
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Silva, Benedetta
- Venue
- BMC Psychiatry
- Published
- 2024-08-02
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 546-546
- ISSN
- 1471-244X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11295432
- OpenAlex
- W4401272519
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 80
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 2.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMC Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- IRIS (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- University of Lausanne
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
- Keywords
- perceived coercion, psychiatric hospital admissions, humiliation, patient satisfaction, information provision, psychiatric inpatient care, patient experience
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Mental Disorders, Coercion, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Admission
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review