Cited by 125Physical Activity and HealthHealth and Lifestyle StudiesHealth and Medical Studies

A short history of time use research; implications for public health

Open access
Bauman, Adrian, Bittman, Michael, Gershuny, Jonathan·2019·BMC Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This section defined time use (TU) research, illustrating its relevance for public health. TUR in the health context is the study of health-enhancing and health-compromising behaviours that are assessed across a 24 h day. The central measurement is the use of Time Use Diaries, which capture 24-48 h, typically asking about behaviour in each 15-min period. TUR is used for understanding correlates of health behaviours, and as a form of population surveillance, assessing behavioural trends over time. MAIN BODY: This paper is a narrative review examining the history of time use research, and the potential uses of TU data for public health research. The history of TUR started in studies of the labour force and patterns of work in the late 19th and early twentieth century, but has more recently been applied to examining health issues. Initial studies had a more economic purpose but over recent decades, TU data have been used to describe the distribution and correlates of health-enhancing patterns of human time use. These studies require large multi-country population data sets, such as the harmonised Multinational Time Use Study hosted at the University of Oxford. TU data are used in physical activity research, as they provide information across the 24-h day, that can be examined as time spent sleeping, sitting/standing/light activity, and time spent in moderate-vigorous activities. TU data are also used for sleep research, examining eating and dietary patterns, exploring geographic distributions in time use behaviours, examining mental health and subjective wellbeing, and examining these data over time. The key methodological challenge has been the development of harmonised methods, so population TU data sets can be compared within and between-countries and over time. CONCLUSIONS: TUR provides new methods for examining public health research questions where a temporal dimension is important. These time use surveys have provided unique data over decades and in many countries that can be compared. They can be used for examining the effects of some large public health interventions or policies within and between countries.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12889-019-6760-y

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Categorizing time use according to predetermined categories of activities has a long history in public health and social sciences for understanding human behavior in a temporal context; determining activity patterns and balance; identifying time use trends in structured or economically valued activity; and as an indicator of wellbeing or quality of life.

    “Categorizing time use according to predetermined categories of activities has a long history in public health and social sciences for understanding human behavior in a temporal context; determining activity patterns and balance; identifying time use trends in structured or economically valued activity; and as an indicator of wellbeing or quality of life (4, 74).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 125

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [14]Robinson JP. Television’s impact on everyday life: Some cross-national evidence. In Television and social behavior, vol. 4, ed. Rubinstein E, Comstock G, Murray J. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office; 1972. p.410–31.
  2. [17]Fisher K Gershuny J Time use and time diary research in Jeff Manza (ed) Oxford bibliographies in sociology 2014 New York Oxford University Press 1 22

Authors
Bauman, A., Bittman, M., & Gershuny, J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • University of New England (AU)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Bauman, Adrian
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2019-06
Volume
19
Issue
S2
Pages
607-607
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2948970525
Cited by
125
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 2
FWCI
8.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Lifestyle Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Studies
Keywords
time diaries, health behavior, physical activity, sleep, dietary habits, mental health, subjective well-being, population surveillance, public health interventions
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Population Surveillance, Public Health, Sleep, Time and Motion Studies, Time Factors, Health Behavior, Exercise, History, 19th Century, History, 20th Century, Actigraphy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review