Cited by 292Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareHealth Policy Implementation Science

Establishing the efficacy of interventions to improve health literacy and health behaviours: a systematic review

Open access
Walters, Ronie, Leslie, Stephen J., Polson, Rob, Cusack, Tara, Gorely, Trish·2020·BMC Public Health

Abstract

Background: The primary aim of this review was to establish whether health literacy interventions, in adults, are effective for improving health literacy. Two secondary aims assessed the impact of health literacy interventions on health behaviours and whether health literacy interventions have been conducted in cardiovascular patients. Methods: A systematic review (Prospero registration: CRD42018110772) with no start date running through until April 2020. Eligible studies were conducted in adults and included a pre/post measure of health literacy. Medline, Embase, Eric, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Psychology and Behavioural Science, HMIC, Web of Science, Scopus, Social Care Online, NHS Scotland Journals, Social Policy and Practice, and Global Health were searched. Two thousand one hundred twenty-seven papers were assessed, and 57 full text papers screened to give 22 unique datasets from 23 papers. Risk of bias was assessed regarding randomisation, allocation sequence concealment, blinding, incomplete outcome data, selective outcome reporting and other biases. Intervention reporting quality was assessed using the TIDieR checklist. Results: Twenty-two studies were included reporting on 10,997 participants in nine countries. The majority of studies (14/22) were published in 2018 or later. Eight studies (n = 1268 participants) also reported on behavioural outcomes. Health literacy interventions resulted in improvements in at least some aspect of health literacy in 15/22 studies (n = 10,180 participants) and improved behavioural outcomes in 7/8 studies (n = 1209 participants). Only two studies were conducted with cardiovascular patients. All studies were at risk of bias with 18 judged as high risk. In addition, there was poor reporting of intervention content with little explication of the theoretical basis for the interventions. Conclusions: Health literacy interventions can improve health literacy and can also lead to changes in health behaviours. Health literacy interventions offer a way to improve outcomes for populations most at risk of health inequalities. Health literacy is a developing field with very few interventions using clear theoretical frameworks. Closer links between health literacy and behaviour change theories and frameworks could result in higher quality and more effective interventions. Prospero registration: Prospero registration: CRD42018110772

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12889-020-08991-0

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Animation, text or social media promotion, or apps help patients acquire health information more effectively.

    “For example, animation [357,358], text or social media promotion [359,360,361], or apps [362,363] help patients acquire health information more effectively [364].”

    From Toward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors (2026) · cites this paper as [364]

    The Results sections on intervention characteristics and intervention effects report that animation and text or social-media interventions improved health literacy compared with controls. But the app study found no significant improvement, and the review measured health literacy rather than directly measuring how effectively patients acquired health information. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 85 · Cited by 292

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. [3]Nutbeam D McGill B Improving health literacy in clinical and community populations International Handbook of Health Literacy: Research, practice and policy across the lifespan 2019 Bristol Policy press
  2. [6]Sørensen K Van den Broucke S Fullam J Doyle G Pelikan J Slonska Z Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models BMC Public Health. 2012 12 80 22276600 PMC3292515
  3. [7]Sykes S Wills J Rowlands G Popple K Understanding critical health literacy: a concept analysis BMC Public Health. 2013 13 1 150 23419015 PMC3583748
  4. [8]Nutbeam D The evolving concept of health literacy Soc Sci Med. 2008 67 12 2072 2078 18952344
  5. [9]Trezona A Dodson S Osborne RH Development of the Organisational health literacy responsiveness (org-HLR) self-assessment tool and process BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 18 1 694 30189874 PMC6128002
  6. [10]Sørensen K Pelikan JM Röthlin F Ganahl K Slonska Z Doyle G Health literacy in Europe: comparative results of the European health literacy survey (HLS-EU) Eur J Pub Health. 2015 25 6 1053 1058 25843827 PMC4668324
  7. [11]Berkman ND Sheridan SL Donahue KE Halpern DJ Crotty K Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review Ann Intern Med. 2011 155 2 97 107 21768583
  8. [12]Taggart J Williams A Dennis S Newall A Shortus T Zwar N A systematic review of interventions in primary care to improve health literacy for chronic disease behavioral risk factors BMC Fam Pract. 2012 13 1 12 22656188 PMC3444864
  9. [14]Friis K Lasgaard M Osborne RH Maindal HT Gaps in understanding health and engagement with healthcare providers across common long-term conditions: a population survey of health literacy in 29 473 Danish citizens BMJ Open. 2016 6 1 e009627 26769783 PMC4735217
  10. [15]Rowlands GP, Mehay A, Hampshire S, Phillips R, Williams P, Mann A, et al. Characteristics of people with low health literacy on coronary heart disease GP registers in South London: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2013;3(1) Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3549254/. [cited 2019 Nov 19]. PMC3549254 23293243
  11. [19]Resurrección DM Moreno-Peral P Gómez-Herranz M Rubio-Valera M Pastor L Caldas de Almeida JM Factors associated with non-participation in and dropout from cardiac rehabilitation programmes: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2019 18 1 38 47 29909641
  12. [20]Pedersen M Overgaard D Andersen I Baastrup M Egerod I Mechanisms and drivers of social inequality in phase II cardiac rehabilitation attendance: a convergent mixed methods study J Adv Nurs. 2018 74 9 2181 2195 29772607
  13. [21]Herber OR Smith K White M Jones MC ‘Just not for me’ – contributing factors to nonattendance/noncompletion at phase III cardiac rehabilitation in acute coronary syndrome patients: a qualitative enquiry J Clin Nurs. 2017 26 21–22 3529 3542 28042887
  14. [23]Geboers B Reijneveld SA Koot JAR de Winter AF Moving towards a Comprehensive Approach for Health Literacy Interventions: The Development of a Health Literacy Intervention Model Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 15 6 1268 1279 PMC6025600 29914065
  15. [24]Albus C Health literacy: is it important for cardiovascular disease prevention? Eur J Prev Cardiolog. 2018 25 9 934 935 29667434
  16. [25]de Melo Ghisi GL da Silva Chaves GS Britto RR Oh P Health literacy and coronary artery disease: a systematic review Patient Educ Couns. 2018 101 2 177 184 28899710
  17. [26]Loke YK Hinz I Wang X Salter C Systematic review of consistency between adherence to cardiovascular or diabetes medication and health literacy in older adults Ann Pharmacother. 2012 46 6 863 872 22669802
  18. [27]Cabellos-Garcia AC Martinez-Sabater A Castro-Sanchez E Kangasniemi M Juarez-Vela R Gea-Caballero V Relation between health literacy, self-care and adherence to treatment with oral anticoagulants in adults: a narrative systematic review BMC Public Health. 2018 18 1 1157 30286744 PMC6172776
  19. [30]Calderon JL Shaheen M Hays RD Fleming ES Norris KC Baker RS Improving diabetes health literacy by animation Diabetes Educ 2014 40 3 361 372 24676274 PMC6309339
  20. [31]Tai BWB Bae YH La Rue CE Law AV Putting words into action: a simple focused education improves prescription label comprehension and functional health literacy J Am Pharmacists Assoc. 2016 56 2 145 152 26922457
  21. [32]Gharachourlo M Mahmoodi Z Akbari Kamrani M Tehranizadeh M Kabir K The effect of a health literacy approach to counselling on the lifestyle of women with gestational diabetes: A clinical trial F1000Res 2018 7 282 29560264 PMC5854987
  22. [33]Knudsen MV, Petersen AK, Angel S, Hjortdal VE, Maindal HT, Laustsen S. Tele-rehabilitation and hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation are comparable in increasing patient activation and health literacy: a pilot study. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2019;1474515119885325 10.1177/1474515119885325. 31702397 · DOI
  23. [35]Banbury A Nancarrow S Dart J Gray L Dodson S Osborne R Adding value to remote monitoring: co-design of a health literacy intervention for older people with chronic disease delivered by telehealth-the telehealth literacy project Patient Educ Couns. 2020 103 3 597 606 31744701
  24. [36]Handa S, Okuyama H, Yamamoto H, Nakamura S, Kato Y. Effectiveness of a smartphone application as a support tool for patients undergoing breast cancer chemotherapy: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Breast Cancer. 2020; 10.1016/j.clbc.2020.01.004. 32201165 · DOI
  25. [37]Kim MT Kim KB Ko J Murry N Xie B Radhakrishnan K Health literacy and outcomes of a community-based self-help intervention: a case of Korean Americans with type 2 diabetes Nurs Res. 2020 69 3 210 218 31972848 PMC7266039
  26. [39]Han HR Song Y Kim M Hedlin HK Kim K Lee HB Breast and cervical Cancer screening literacy among Korean American women: a community health worker-led intervention Am J Public Health. 2017 107 1 159 165 27854539 PMC5308166
  27. [40]Otilingam PG Gatz M Tello E Escobar AJ Goldstein A Torres M Buenos Hábitos Alimenticios Para Una Buena Salud: evaluation of a nutrition education program to improve heart health and brain health in Latinas J Aging Health. 2015 27 1 177 192 25231884 PMC4450745
  28. [41]Zhuang R Xiang Y Han T Yang G Zhang Y Cell phone-based health education messaging improves health literacy Afr Health Sci. 2016 16 1 311 318 27358647 PMC4915430
  29. [43]Parekh N Jiang J Buchan M Meyers M Gibbs H Krebs P Nutrition literacy among Cancer survivors: feasibility results from the healthy eating and living against breast Cancer (HEAL-BCa) study: a pilot randomized controlled trial J Cancer Educ. 2018 33 6 1239 1249 28624990
  30. [44]Liu Y-B Li Y-F Liu L Chen Y-L Effectiveness of the teach-back method for improving the health literacy of senior citizens in nursing homes JJNS. 2018 15 3 195 202 29152875
  31. [45]Mas FS Schmitt CL Jacobson HE Myers OB A cardiovascular health intervention for Spanish speakers: the health literacy and ESL curriculum J Community Health. 2018 43 4 717 724 29428986 PMC6033637
  32. [46]Mas FS Ji M Fuentes BO Tinajero J The health literacy and ESL study: a community-based intervention for Spanish-speaking adults J Health Commun. 2015 20 4 369 376 25602615 PMC4385490
  33. [48]Tsai TI Lee SYD Yu WR Impact of a problem-based learning (PBL) health literacy program on immigrant Women’s health literacy, health empowerment, navigation efficacy, and health care utilization J Health Commun. 2018 23 4 340 349 29543568
  34. [49]Uemura K Yamada M Okamoto H Effects of active learning on health literacy and behavior in older adults: a randomized controlled trial J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 66 9 1721 1729 30019768
  35. [50]Fiedler S Pfaff H Petrowski K Pförtner T-K Effects of a classroom training program for promoting health literacy among IT managers in the workplace: a randomized controlled trial J Occup Environ Med. 2019 61 1 51 60 30335676
  36. [51]McCaffery KJ Morony S Muscat DM Hayen A Shepherd HL Dhillon HM Evaluation of an Australian health literacy program delivered in adult education settings Health Lit Res Pract. 2019 3 3 S42 S57 31687657 PMC6826892
  37. [52]Smith CA Chang E Gallego G Khan A Armour M Balneaves LG An education intervention to improve decision making and health literacy among older Australians: a randomised controlled trial BMC Geriatr. 2019 19 1 129 31064336 PMC6505289
  38. [53]Ad Hoc Committee on Health Literacy Health literacy - report of the council on scientific affairs JAMA-J Am Med Assoc. 1999 281 6 552 557 10022112
  39. [57]Berkman ND Davis TC McCormack L Health literacy: what is it? J Health Commun. 2010 15 S2 9 19 20845189
  40. [58]Haghdoost AA, Rakhshani F, Aarabi M, Montazeri A, Tavousi M, Solimanian A, et al. Iranian Health Literacy Questionnaire (IHLQ): An Instrument for Measuring Health Literacy in Iran. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015;17(6) Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4537788/. [cited 2019 Jul 11]. PMC4537788 26290752
  41. [59]Han H-R Huh B Kim MT Kim J Nguyen T Development and Validation of the Assessment of Health Literacy in Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening J Health Commun 2014 19 sup2 267 284 25315598 PMC4751992
  42. [61]Li Z Sun Z Research on the status of health literacy among residents in Hunan Province and its influencing factors (PhD thesis). Central South University 2010
  43. [62]Baker DW Williams MV Parker RM Gazmararian JA Nurss J Development of a brief test to measure functional health literacy Patient Educ Couns. 1999 38 1 33 42 14528569
  44. [63]Parker RM Baker DW Williams MV Nurss JR The test of functional health literacy in adults J Gen Intern Med. 1995 10 10 537 541 8576769
  45. [64]Baker DW The meaning and the measure of health literacy J Gen Intern Med. 2006 21 8 878 883 16881951 PMC1831571
  46. [65]Weiss BD Mays MZ Martz W Castro KM DeWalt DA Pignone MP Quick assessment of literacy in primary care: the newest vital sign Ann Fam Med. 2005 3 6 514 522 16338915 PMC1466931
  47. [69]Suka M Odajima T Kasai M Igarashi A Ishikawa H Kusama M The 14-item health literacy scale for Japanese adults (HLS-14) Environ Health Prev Med. 2013 18 5 407 23689952 PMC3773092
  48. [71]Osborne RH Batterham RW Elsworth GR Hawkins M Buchbinder R The grounded psychometric development and initial validation of the health literacy questionnaire (HLQ) BMC Public Health. 2013 13 1 658 675 23855504 PMC3718659
  49. [72]Davis TC Long SW Jackson RH Mayeaux EJ George RB Murphy PW Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument Fam Med. 1993 25 6 391 395 8349060
  50. [74]Nutbeam D McGill B Premkumar P Improving health literacy in community populations: a review of progress Health Promot Int. 2018 33 5 901 911 28369557
  51. [75]Visscher BB Steunenberg B Heijmans M Hofstede JM Devillé W van der Heide I Evidence on the effectiveness of health literacy interventions in the EU: a systematic review BMC Public Health. 2018 18 1 1414 30594180 PMC6310940
  52. [76]Hagger MS Weed M DEBATE: do interventions based on behavioral theory work in the real world? Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 16 1 36 31023328 PMC6482531
  53. [78]Dalgetty R Miller CB Dombrowski SU Examining the theory-effectiveness hypothesis: a systematic review of systematic reviews Br J Health Psychol. 2019 24 2 334 356 30793445
  54. [79]van der Heide I Rademakers J Schipper M Droomers M Sorensen K Uiters E Health literacy of Dutch adults: a cross sectional survey BMC Public Health. 2013 13 11 23445541 PMC3599856
  55. [80]Christy SM Gwede CK Sutton SK Chavarria E Davis SN Abdulla R Health literacy among medically underserved: the role of demographic factors, social influence, and religious beliefs J Health Commun. 2017 22 11 923 931 29125435 PMC6278594
  56. [81]Oliffe JL McCreary DR Black N Flannigan R Goldenberg SL Canadian Men’s health literacy: a nationally representative study Health Promot Pract. 2019 19 1524839919837625 30884981
  57. [82]Noble N Paul C Turon H Oldmeadow C Which modifiable health risk behaviours are related? A systematic review of the clustering of smoking, nutrition, alcohol and physical activity (‘SNAP’) health risk factors Prev Med. 2015 81 16 41 26190368
  58. [84]Brainard J Wilsher SH Salter C Loke YK Methodological review: quality of randomized controlled trials in health literacy BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 16 1 246 27402048 PMC4940982

Authors
Walters, R., Leslie, S. J., Polson, R., Cusack, T., & Gorely, T.
Affiliations
  • University of the Highlands and Islands (GB)
  • Raigmore Hospital (GB)
  • University College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
Walters, Ronie
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2020-06-30
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
1040-1040
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3039781545
Cited by
292
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 57 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Lenus, The Irish Health Repository (Dr Steevens Hospital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Interreg
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
health literacy interventions, health literacy, health behavior, cardiovascular patients, intervention effectiveness, behaviour change theory, intervention reporting quality, risk of bias, health disparities
MeSH terms
Health Promotion, Humans, Scotland, Program Evaluation, Health Behavior, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Health Literacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review