Cited by 58Bacterial Infections and VaccinesData-Driven Disease SurveillanceForecasting Techniques and Applications

ARIMA and ARIMA-ERNN Models for Prediction of Pertussis Incidence in Mainland China From 2004 to 2021

Open access
Wang, Meng, Pan, Jinhua, Li, Xinghui, Li, Mengying, Liu, Zhixi, Zhao, Qi, Luo, Linyun, Chen, Haiping +5 more·2022·BMC Public Health

Abstract

Objective: To compare an autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model with a model that combines ARIMA with the Elman recurrent neural network (ARIMA-ERNN) in predicting the incidence of pertussis in mainland China. Background: The incidence of pertussis has increased rapidly in mainland China since 2016, making the disease an increasing public health threat. There is a pressing need for models capable of accurately predicting the incidence of pertussis in order to guide prevention and control measures. We developed and compared two models for predicting pertussis incidence in mainland China. Methods: Data on the incidence of pertussis in mainland China from 2004 to 2019 were obtained from the official website of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. An ARIMA model was established using SAS (ver. 9.4) software and an ARIMA-ERNN model was established using MATLAB (ver. R2019a) software. The performances of these models were compared. Results: From 2004 to 2019, there were 104,837 reported cases of pertussis in mainland China, with an increasing incidence over time. The incidence of pertussis showed obvious seasonal characteristics, with the peak lasting from March to September every year. Compared with the mean squared error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of the ARIMA model, those of the ARIMA-ERNN model were 81.43%, 95.97% and 80.86% lower, respectively, in fitting performance. In terms of prediction performance, the MAE, MSE and MAPE were 37.75%, 56.88% and 43.75% lower, respectively. Conclusion: The fitting and prediction performances of the ARIMA-ERNN model were better than those of the ARIMA model. This provides theoretical support for the prediction of infectious diseases and should be beneficial to public health decision making.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12889-022-13872-9

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies have successfully applied ARIMA models to forecast disease incidence trends, consistently achieving robust fitting and predictive performance.

    “previous studies have successfully applied ARIMA models to forecast disease incidence trends, consistently achieving robust fitting and predictive performance [28]”

    From Longitudinal Analysis and Predictive Modeling of Nursing‐Sensitive Quality Indicators in Hemodialysis (2026) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Introduction (page not available in our copy) reports two previous ARIMA studies of pertussis incidence: one predicted trends with acceptably low errors, and another found its ARIMA model performed best among those tested. That supports successful applications, but not the broader claim of consistently robust fitting and prediction across disease incidence trends. The Results (Model Prediction; page not available) also report that this paper’s ARIMA model performed worse than its combined ARIMA-ERNN model. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. [1]Della Torre JAG Benevides GN Melo AMAG Ferreira CR Pertussis: The resurgence of a public health threat J Autopsy & Case Reports 2015 5 9 16 10.4322/acr.2015.006 PMC4584670 26484329 · DOI
  2. [2]Crowcroft NS Pebody RG Recent developments in pertussis. J Lancet 2006 367 1926 1936 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68848-X 16765762 · DOI
  3. [3]Lai FY Thoon KC Ang LW Comparative seroepidemiology of pertussis, diphtheria and poliovirus antibodies in Singapore: waning pertussis immunity in a highly immunized population and the need for adolescent booster doses[J] Vaccine 2012 30 24 3566 3571 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.03.059 22475863 · DOI
  4. [4]Yeung KHT Duclos P Nelson EAS Hutubessy RCW An update of the global burden of pertussis in children younger than 5 years: a modelling study Lancet Infect Dis 2017 17 9 974 980 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30390-0 28623146 · DOI
  5. [6]Mattoo S Cherry JD Molecular pathogenesis, epidemiology, and clinical manifestations of respiratory infections due to Bordetella pertussis and other Bordetella subspecies J Clin Microbiol Rev 2005 18 326 382 10.1128/CMR.18.2.326-382.2005 PMC1082800 15831828 · DOI
  6. [7]Chen CC Estimated incidence of pertussis in people aged <50 years in the United States Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016 12 2536 2545 10.1080/21645515.2016.1186313 27246119 PMC5085009 · DOI
  7. [8]Cherry JD The history of pertussis (whooping cough); 1906–2015: facts, myths, and misconceptions Current epidemiology reports. 2015 2 120 130 10.1007/s40471-015-0041-9 · DOI
  8. [9]Saadatian-Elahi M Pertussis: biology, epidemiology and prevention Vaccine 2016 34 5819 5826 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.10.029 27780629 · DOI
  9. [10]Zhang T Yin F Zhou T Zhang X Li X Multivariate time series analysis on the dynamic relationship between Class B notifiable diseases and gross domestic product (GDP) in China Sci Rep. 2016 6 1 10 10.1038/s41598-016-0001-8 28011977 PMC5515987 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [11]Yongbin Time series modeling of pertussis incidence in China from 2004 to 2018 with a novel wavelet based SARIMA-NAR hybrid model Plos One. 2018 13 13 e0208404 30586416 PMC6306235
  11. [12]Zeng Q Li D Time series analysis of temporal trends in the pertussis incidence in Mainland China from 2005 to 2016 Sci Rep. 2016 6 32367 10.1038/srep32367 27577101 PMC5006025 · DOI
  12. [13]Weihong Cui Na Li Yaming Zheng The economic burden of pertussis in Yantai city, 2017–2018 Chinese Journal of Vaccines and Immunization. 2020 26 3 293 295
  13. [14]ShangTingTing Analysis of the economic burden of pertussis Journal of Modern Medicine. 2019 35 23 3679 3681
  14. [15]Masum S, Liu Y, Chiverton J. Comparative analysis of the outcomes of differing time series forecasting strategies. 2017 13th International Conference on Natural Computation, Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (ICNC-FSKD); 2017. p. 1964–8. 10.1109/FSKD.2017.8393069. · DOI
  15. [16]Zhang GP Time series forecasting using a hybrid ARIMA and neural network model J Neurocomputing 2003 50 159 175 10.1016/S0925-2312(01)00702-0 · DOI
  16. [17]Fei Y Li WQ Improve artificial neural network for medical analysis, diagnosis and prediction J J Crit Care 2017 40 293 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.06.012 28647140 · DOI
  17. [18]Zhang J Nawata K A comparative study on predicting influenza outbreaks Biosci Trends 2017 11 5 533 541 10.5582/bst.2017.01257 29070762 · DOI
  18. [19]Panigrahi S Behera HS A hybrid ETS–ANN model for time series forecasting J Eng Appl Artif Intel 2017 66 49 59 10.1016/j.engappai.2017.07.007 · DOI
  19. [20]Zhang XALY Comparative Study of Four Time Series Methods in Forecasting Typhoid Fever Incidence in China J Plos One 2013 8 1 11 PMC3641111 23650546
  20. [21]Wang YW Shen ZZ Jiang Y Comparison of autoregressive integrated moving average model and generalised regression neural network model for prediction of haemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome in China: a time-series study J Bmj Open 2019 9 e25773 PMC6589045 31209084
  21. [22]de Greeff SC Seasonal patterns in time series of pertussis Epidemiology & Infection. 2009 137 1388 1395 10.1017/S0950268809002489 19327200 · DOI
  22. [23]Leong RNF Wood JG Turner RM Newall AT Estieasonal patterns in time series of pustralian pertussis notifications from 1991 to 2016: evidence of spring to summer peaks J Epidemiol Infect 2019 147 e155 10.1017/S0950268818003680 PMC6518527 31063086 · DOI
  23. [24]Marchi S Pertussis over two decades: seroepidemiological study in a large population of the Siena Province, Tuscany Region Central Italy J Bmj Open 2019 9 e32987 PMC6830678 31666278
  24. [25]Bento A Riolo M Choi Y King A Rohani P Core pertussis transmission groups in England and Wales: A tale of two eras J Vaccine 2018 36 1160 1166 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.01.046 PMC5806206 29395520 · DOI
  25. [26]Von K O Nig CW Factors influencing the spread of pertussis in households Eur J Pediatr. 1998 157 391 394 10.1007/s004310050836 9625336 · DOI
  26. [27]Raycheva R Stoilova Y Kevorkyan A Rangelova V Epidemiological Prognosis of Pertussis Incidence in Bulgaria Folia Med (Plovdiv) 2020 62 3 509 514 10.3897/folmed.62.e49812 33009762 · DOI
  27. [28]National Health Commission of the PRC, 2007. Pertussis Diagnostic Criteria. Available at: http://www.nhc.gov.cn/wjw/s9491/201410/52040bc16d3b4eecae56ec28b3358666.shtml. Accessed May 23, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Ref list]
  28. [29]Zhai M, Li W, Tie P, et al. Research on the predictive effect of a combined model of ARIMA and neural networks on human brucellosis in Shanxi Province, China: a time series predictive analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21(1):280. Published 2021 Mar 19. doi:10.1186/s12879-021-05973-4 PMC7980350 33740904 · DOI
  29. [30]MATROUSHI S. Hybrid computational intelligence systems based on statistical and neural networks methods for time series forecasting: the case of gold price. J Lincoln University; 2011. https://hdl.handle.net/10182/3986.
  30. [31]Qian Y Forecasting deaths of road traffic injuries in China using an artificial neural network J Traffic Injury Prevention 2020 21 407 412 10.1080/15389588.2020.1770238 32500738 · DOI
  31. [32]Zheng Y Zhang L Zhu X Guo G A comparative study of two methods to predict the incidence of hepatitis B in Guangxi, China Plos one. 2020 15 e0234660 10.1371/journal.pone.0234660 32579598 PMC7314421 · DOI
  32. [33]Lin FJ Lee SY Chou PH Intelligent nonsingular terminal sliding-mode control using MIMO elman neural network for piezo-flexural nanopositioning stage IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics & Frequency Control. 2012 59 2716 10.1109/TUFFC.2012.2513 23221221 · DOI
  33. [34]Kim S Kim H A new metric of absolute percentage error for intermittent demand forecasts J International Journal of Forecasting 2016 32 669 679 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2015.12.003 · DOI
  34. [35]Zhang Y Resurgence of pertussis infections in Shandong, China: space-time cluster and trend analysis The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 2019 100 1342 1354 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0013 30994096 PMC6553910 · DOI
  35. [36]Kim C Yi S Cho SI Recent increase in pertussis incidence in Korea: an age-period-cohort analysis Epidemiol Health 2021 43 e2021053 10.4178/epih.e2021053 34412447 PMC8666685 · DOI
  36. [37]Chinese Preventive Medicine Association, Chapter on Vaccines and Immunization. Expert consensus on the China Pertussis Initiative [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Clinical Pediatrics,2021,36(11):801–810. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn101070-20210308-00273. 33874698 · DOI
  37. [38]Spokes PJ Quinn HE McAnulty JM Review of the 2008–2009 pertussis epidemic in NSW: notifications and hospitalisations NSW Public Health Bull 2010 21 167 173 10.1071/NB10031 20883655 · DOI
  38. [40]Amirthalingam G Effectiveness of maternal pertussis vaccination in England: an observational study J The Lancet 2014 384 1521 1528 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60686-3 25037990 · DOI · Paper page
  39. [41]Leong RNF Wood JG Turner RM Newall AT Estimating seasonal variation in Australian pertussis notifications from 1991 to 2016: evidence of spring to summer peaks J Epidemiol Infect 2019 147 e155 10.1017/S0950268818003680 PMC6518527 31063086 · DOI
  40. [42]Guimarães LM Carneiro ELND Carvalho-Costa FA Increasing incidence of pertussis in Brazil: a retrospective study using surveillance data BMC infectious diseases. 2015 15 442 10.1186/s12879-015-1222-3 26498058 PMC4619034 · DOI
  41. [43]Bhatti MM Eight-year review of Bordetella pertussis testing reveals seasonal pattern in the United States Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society. 2017 6 91 93 26621328

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, M., Pan, J., Li, X., Li, M., Liu, Z., Zhao, Q., Luo, L., Chen, H., Chen, S., Jiang, F., Zhang, L., Wang, W., & Wang, Y.
Affiliations
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University (CN)
  • China National Biotechnology (China) (CN)
  • Hunan Normal University (CN)
  • Guizhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Weibing
  • Wang, Ying
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2022-07-29
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
1447-1447
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4288704567
Cited by
58
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 3
FWCI
6.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Forecasting Techniques and Applications
Keywords
pertussis, incidence forecasting, ARIMA model, Elman neural network, infectious disease forecasting, seasonal variation, mainland China, public health decision-making
MeSH terms
China, Forecasting, Humans, Software, Whooping Cough, Models, Statistical, Incidence, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review