Evaluation of a web-based asthma self-management system: a randomised controlled pilot trial
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Asthma is the most common chronic condition of childhood and disproportionately affects inner-city minority children. Low rates of asthma preventer medication adherence is a major contributor to poor asthma control in these patients. Web-based methods have potential to improve patient knowledge and medication adherence by providing interactive patient education, monitoring of symptoms and medication use, and by facilitation of communication and teamwork among patients and health care providers. Few studies have evaluated web-based asthma support environments using all of these potentially beneficial interventions. The multidimensional website created for this study, BostonBreathes, was designed to intervene on multiple levels, and was evaluated in a pilot trial. METHODS: An interactive, engaging website for children with asthma was developed to promote adherence to asthma medications, provide a platform for teamwork between caregivers and patients, and to provide primary care providers with up-to-date symptom information and data on medication use. Fifty-eight (58) children primarily from inner city Boston with persistent-level asthma were randomised to either usual care or use of BostonBreathes. Subjects completed asthma education activities, and reported their symptoms and medication use. Primary care providers used a separate interface to monitor their patients' website use, their reported symptoms and medication use, and were able to communicate online via a discussion board with their patients and with an asthma specialist. RESULTS: After 6-months, reported wheezing improved significantly in both intervention and control groups, and there were significant improvements in the intervention group only in night-time awakening and parental loss of sleep, but there were no significant differences between intervention and control groups in these measures. Emergency room or acute visits to a physician for asthma did not significantly change in either group. Among the subgroup of subjects with low controller medication adherence at baseline, adherence improved significantly only in the intervention group. Knowledge of the purpose of controller medicine increased significantly in the intervention group, a statistically significant improvement over the control group. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that a multidimensional web-based educational, monitoring, and communication platform may have positive influences on pediatric patients' asthma-related knowledge and use of asthma preventer medications.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Methodological quality was good in 3 studies (range: 20-25).
“Methodological quality was good in 3 studies (range: 20-25) [53,79,80]”
From Effectiveness and Acceptability of Asynchronous Digital Health in Asthma Care: Mixed Methods Systematic Review (2024) · cites this paper as [79]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 83
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [24]The ehealth behavior management model: a stage-based approach to behavior change and management. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online]. 2004; 1(4); 1-13. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2004/oct/pdf/04_0070.pdf. PMC1277954 15670446
- Authors
- Wiecha, J. M., Adams, W. G., Rybin, D., Rizzodepaoli, M., Keller, J., & Clay, J. M.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- Boston Medical Center (US)
- Cambridge Health Alliance (US)
- Indiana University School of Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wiecha, John M
- Venue
- BMC Pulmonary Medicine
- Published
- 2015-02-25
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-17
- ISSN
- 1471-2466 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4355974
- OpenAlex
- W2136310982
- Cited by
- 83
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 6.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMC Pulmonary Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Purdue University Indianapolis (Indiana University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- PMC
- Funders
- Commonwealth Fund
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
- Keywords
- childhood asthma, asthma self-management, online intervention, medication adherence, controller medications, asthma education, patient-provider communication, asthma knowledge, nocturnal awakenings
- MeSH terms
- Activities of Daily Living, Adolescent, Asthma, Child, Communication, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Patient Education as Topic, Physician-Patient Relations, Pilot Projects, Self Care, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Treatment Outcome, Internet, Medication Adherence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review