Cited by 58Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchPhysical Activity and HealthCardiovascular and exercise physiology

The effects of a physical activity counseling program after an exacerbation in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: a randomized controlled pilot study

Open access
Hornikx, Miek, Demeyer, Heleen, Camillo, Carlos Augusto, Janssens, Wim, Troosters, Thierry·2015·BMC Pulmonary Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In some patients with COPD, the disease is characterized by exacerbations. Severe exacerbations warrant a hospitalization, with prolonged detrimental effects on physical activity. Interventions after an exacerbation may improve physical activity, with longstanding health benefits. Physical activity counseling and real-time feedback were effective in stable COPD. No evidence is available on the use of this therapeutic modality in patients after a COPD exacerbation. METHODS: Thirty patients were randomly assigned to usual care or physical activity counseling, by telephone contacts at a frequency of 3 times a week and real-time feedback. Lung function, peripheral muscle strength, functional exercise capacity, symptom experience and COPD-related health status were assessed during hospital stay and 1 month later. RESULTS: Both groups significantly recovered in physical activity (PAsteps: control group: 1013 ± 1275 steps vs intervention group: 984 ± 1208 steps (p = 0.0005); PAwalk: control group: 13 ± 14 min vs intervention group: 13 ± 16 min (p = 0.0002)), functional exercise capacity (control group: 64 ± 59 m (p = 0.002) vs intervention group: 67 ± 84 m (p = 0.02)) and COPD-related health status (CAT: control group: -5 [-7 to 1] (p = 0.02) vs intervention group: -3 [-10 to 1] points (p = 0.03)). No differences between groups were observed. CONCLUSION: From our pilot study, we concluded that telephone based physical activity counseling with pedometer feedback after an exacerbation did not result in better improvements in physical activity and clinical outcomes compared to usual care. Because of the difficult recruitment and the negative intermediate analyses, this study was not continued. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02223962. Registered 4 September 2013.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12890-015-0126-8

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 58

Authors
Hornikx, M., Demeyer, H., Camillo, C. A., Janssens, W., & Troosters, T.
Affiliations
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Troosters, Thierry
Venue
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Published
2015-11-04
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
136-136
ISSN
1471-2466 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2126477996
Cited by
58
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6
FWCI
4.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Pulmonary Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (G⋅0871⋅13, IWT-TBM: G335102)
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (202425/2011-8)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, COPD exacerbations, physical activity counseling, telephone counseling, real-time feedback, functional exercise capacity, peripheral muscle strength, lung function
MeSH terms
Aged, Counseling, Exercise Test, Feedback, Female, Forced Expiratory Volume, Health Status, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Pilot Projects, Surveys and Questionnaires, Respiratory Function Tests, Telephone, Vital Capacity, Treatment Outcome, Exercise Tolerance, Disease Progression, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Quadriceps Muscle, Muscle Strength, Accelerometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review