Cited by 8Endometriosis Research and TreatmentMenstrual Health and DisordersEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

Tolerability of endometriosis medical treatment: a comparison between combined hormonal contraceptives and progestins

Open access
da Costa Pinheiro, Denise Joffily Pereira, Pereira, Ana Maria Gomes, Antonini, Marcelo, Maria Albuquerque Salgado, Isabella, Dias, Alexandre Torchio, Lopes, Reginaldo Guedes Coelho·2023·BMC Women's Health

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease that occurs in women of reproductive age. Much of the treatment involves hormone therapy that suppresses the proliferation of endometriosis lesions. Objective To compare discontinuation rates of pharmacological treatment with estrogen-progestins and progestins medications. The secondary objective is to evaluate the main side effects of these drugs in patients with endometriosis. Methods This retrospective study analyzed data from 330 patients who attended the Hospital of the State Public Servant of São Paulo from August 1999 to September 2020 and received pharmacological treatment for endometriosis. The data were obtained by review of the files of medical appointments with specialized staff. Results The median treatment time was 18 months, ranging from 1 to 168 months, and 177 patients interrupted the proposed treatment. The combined contraceptives with estrogens and progestins were significantly linked to treatment interruption, with a relative risk of 1,99 ( p = 0,005). The most important side effects that resulted in treatment interruption were pain persistence ( p = 0,043), weight gain ( p = 0,017) and spotting ( p < 0,001).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12905-023-02647-y

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 8

Authors
da Costa Pinheiro, D. J. P., Pereira, A. M. G., Antonini, M., Maria Albuquerque Salgado, I., Dias, A. T., & Lopes, R. G. C.
Affiliations
Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual (BR)
Venue
BMC Women's Health
Published
2023-09-23
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
510-510
ISSN
1472-6874 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386980854
Cited by
8
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Women s Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
endometriosis, combined hormonal contraceptives, progestins, treatment discontinuation, drug tolerability, adverse drug reactions, pain persistence, weight gain, spotting, hormone therapy
MeSH terms
Brazil, Contraceptive Agents, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Progestins, Retrospective Studies, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review