Cited by 52Empathy and Medical EducationHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Can stoic training develop medical student empathy and resilience? A mixed-methods study

Open access
Brown, Megan E. L., MacLellan, Alexander, Laughey, William, Omer, Usmaan, Himmi, Ghita, LeBon, Tim, Finn, Gabrielle M.·2022·BMC Medical Education

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Empathic erosion and burnout represent crises within medicine. Psychological training has been used to promote empathy and personal resilience, yet some training useful within adjacent fields remain unexplored, e.g., Stoic training. Given recent research within psychology suggesting that Stoic training increases emotional wellbeing, exploring this type of training within health professions education is important. We therefore asked: What impact would a Stoicism informed online training package have on third year medical students' resilience and empathy? METHODS: 24 third year medical students took part in 12 days of online training (SeRenE), based on Stoic philosophy, and co-developed with psychotherapists. A mixed-methods study was conducted to evaluate impact. Pre- and post-SeRenE students completed the Stoic Attitudes and Behaviours Scale (SABS), Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) and Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE). All students completed semi-structured interviews following training and 2 months post-SeRenE. Thematic analysis was employed to analyse qualitative data, whilst within subjects t-tests and correlational analyses were conducted on quantitative data. RESULTS: Quantitatively, stoic ideation, resilience and empathy increased post-training, with correlational analyses suggesting resilience and empathy increase in tandem. Qualitatively, four themes were identified: 1. Negative visualisation aids emotional and practical preparedness; 2. Stoic mindfulness encourages students to think about how they think and feel; 3. Stoic reflection develops the empathic imagination; and 4. Evaluating the accessibility of SeRenE. CONCLUSIONS: Our data lend support to the ability of Stoic-based psychological training to positively influence resilience and empathy. Although, quantitatively, results were mixed, qualitative data offers rich insight. The practice of negative visualisation, promoted by SeRenE, encourages student self-efficacy and planning, domains of resilience associated with academic success. Further, this study demonstrates a connection between Stoic practice and empathy, which manifests through development of the empathic imagination and a sense of empathic bravery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12909-022-03391-x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In included studies, resilience was linked to emotional distress and empathy.

    “Resilience was also linked emotional distress (34) and empathy (32).”
  • Seven out of nine studies examining effects of interventions on students found that mind-body skills, psychoeducation, CBT, and positive psychology had a positive impact on resilience, burnout, stress, depression, anxiety, and well-being.

    “Seven (29, 32, 37, 41, 52, 54, 65) out of nine studies (29, 32, 37, 41, 51, 52, 54, 56, 65) examining the effects of interventions on students found that mind-body skills, psychoeducation, CBT, and positive psychology had a positive impact on resilience, burnout, stress, depression, anxiety, and well-being.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 52

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [15]Shapiro J Decety J The paradox of teaching empathy in medical education Empathy: from bench to bedside 2002 Cambridge MA MIT press
  2. [21]Sellars J Lessons in Stoicism: what ancient philosophers teach us about how to live 2019 London Penguin
  3. [33]Gill C. Building resilience today: how can ancient stoicism help. Resilience and health: in a fast-changing. World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2016. p. 33. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/resilience-and-health-in-a-fastchanging-world/building-resilience-today-how-can-ancient-stoicism-help/16EF086F56845C17447E3883058EADCA.
  4. [37]Teddlie C Tashakkori A Teddlie C Tashakkori A Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioural sciences Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research 2003 Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications
  5. [48]White C Gruppen L Fantone J Self-regulated learning in medical education. In: understanding medical education 2014 West Sussex Wiley Blackwell

Authors
Brown, M. E. L., MacLellan, A., Laughey, W., Omer, U., Himmi, G., LeBon, T., & Finn, G. M.
Affiliations
  • University of York (GB)
  • University of Bath (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Brown, Megan E. L.
Venue
BMC Medical Education
Published
2022-05-03
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
340-340
ISSN
1472-6920 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4225405035
Cited by
52
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 3
FWCI
5.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Medical Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
Stoicism, medical students, empathy, resilience, burnout, empathic imagination, online training, health professions education, mental training
MeSH terms
Burnout, Professional, Empathy, Humans, Students, Medical, Self Efficacy, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review