CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 15Simulation-Based Education in HealthcareInnovations in Medical EducationSurgical Simulation and Training

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The efficacy of simulation-based learning versus non-simulation-based learning in endocrinology education: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Wu, Zeyu, Huang, Yiling, Lyu, Ling, Huang, Yu, Ping, Fan·2024·BMC Medical Education
DOI 10.1186/s12909-024-06010-zPMC PMC11443629
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Simulation-Based Learning (SBL) is increasingly adopted in medical education across various specialties, employing realistic simulations to significantly enhance learning experiences. However, a comprehensive evaluation of its effectiveness specifically in endocrinology has not yet been conducted. The study aims to systematically review and meta-analyze the impact of SBL versus Non-Simulation-Based Learning (NSBL) on knowledge acquisition, skills, satisfaction, and interest in learning among endocrinology trainees. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to the PRISMA guidelines, searching PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data, Weipu, and Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM) until March 2024. We included randomized controlled trials comparing SBL to NSBL in endocrinology education. The quality evaluation relied on the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool. The main results included evaluations from both theoretical and practical assessments. Additional measures consisted of assessing satisfaction and interest in learning. RESULTS: = 93%) compared to NSBL. Additionally, SBL was associated with higher satisfaction and greater interest in learning. No significant publication bias was detected, and sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of these findings. CONCLUSIONS: SBL significantly enhances knowledge, skills, satisfaction, and interest in learning within endocrinology education compared to NSBL. These findings support the integration of high-quality SBL into endocrinology curricula to improve educational outcomes. Future research should explore the lasting effects of SBL on knowledge retention and clinical practice, as well as to evaluate its cost-effectiveness and compatibility with various educational tools in diverse settings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12909-024-06010-z

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Current hospital management curricula overemphasize legacy theories and underrepresent emerging competencies such as DRG/DIP.

    “curricula overemphasize legacy theories and underrepresent emerging competencies such as Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRG) / Diagnosis-Intervention Packet (DIP) [2–4]”

    From Reforming hospital management education with the P-MASE pedagogy: a randomized controlled trial (2026) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Background (page not available) discusses limitations of conventional teaching in endocrinology, not hospital management curricula. Searches for DRG/DIP and for the claimed emphasis on legacy theories found no passage in our copy addressing those points. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Santen RJ, Joham A, Fishbein L, Vella KR, Ebeling PR, Gibson-Helm M, et al. Career advancement: meeting the challenges confronting the next generation of endocrinologists and endocrine researchers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101:4512–20. · DOI
  2. Mourad A, Jurjus A, Hajj Hussein I. The what or the how: a review of teaching tools and methods in medical education. Med Sci Educ. 2016;26:723–8. · DOI
  3. Vozenilek J, Huff JS, Reznek M, Gordon JA. See one, do one, teach one: advanced technology in medical education. Acad Emerg Med off J Soc Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11:1149–54. · DOI
  4. Gormley GJ, Murphy P. When I say … simulation. Med Educ. 2023;57:1182–3. · DOI
  5. Cook DA, Hatala R, Brydges R, Zendejas B, Szostek JH, Wang AT, et al. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2011;306:978–88. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Su Y, Zeng Y. Simulation based training versus non-simulation based training in anesthesiology: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Heliyon. 2023;9:e18249. · DOI
  7. Tarrahi MJ, Kianpour M, Ghasemi M, Mohamadirizi S. The effectiveness of simulation training in obstetric emergencies: a meta-analysis. J Educ Health Promot. 2022;11:82. · DOI
  8. Mishra R, Hemlata, Trivedi D. Simulation-based learning in nursing curriculum- time to prepare quality nurses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heliyon. 2023;9:e16014. · DOI
  9. Wong RWG, Lochnan HA. A web-based simulation of a longitudinal clinic used in a 4-week ambulatory rotation: a cohort study. BMC Med Educ. 2009;9:8. · DOI
  10. Lucero KS, Larkin A, Zakharkin S, Wysham C, Anderson J. The impact of web-based continuing medical education using patient simulation on real-world treatment selection in type 2 diabetes: retrospective case-control analysis. JMIR Med Educ. 2023;9:e48586. · DOI
  11. Chen W, Kempegowda P, Melson E, Davitadze M, Aftab M, Ooi E, et al. Simulation training using WhatsApp (Sim-thru-WhatsApp) improves doctors’ confidence in endocrine and diabetes case management. Clin Med Lond Engl. 2020;20:s62–3. · DOI
  12. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Aghili R, Khamseh ME, Taghavinia M, Malek M, Emami Z, Baradaran HR, et al. Virtual patient simulation: promotion of clinical reasoning abilities of medical students. Knowl Manag E-Learn Int J. 2012;4:518–27.
  14. Brown A, Anderson D, Szerlip HM. Using standardized patients to teach disease management skills to preclinical students: a pilot project. Teach Learn Med. 2003;15:84–7. · DOI
  15. Cheng W, Na LM, Xiao S, Quan L, Du GL, Abulikemu·urdi, et al. The application of international students as simulated standardized patients in bilingual medical education: an example from endocrinology. J Xinjiang Med Univ. 2017;40:408–10.
  16. Diehl LA, Souza RM, Gordan PA, Esteves RZ, Coelho ICM. InsuOnline, an electronic game for medical education on insulin therapy: a randomized controlled trial with primary care physicians. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19:e72. · DOI
  17. Du RY, Li L. Application of virtual simulation teaching to the online during-course practice in endocrinology. China Med Educ Technol. 2022;36:685–9.
  18. Fu JF, Gao B, Zhang MY, Xing Y, Zhai WS, Li XM, et al. The application experience of teachers acting as standardized patients in endocrinology clinical teaching and assessment. Health Vocat Educ. 2013;31:112–3.
  19. Gao J, Zhang J, Wang CF, Wang MZ, Li XL. The application of scenario simulation and pbl teaching in clinical endocrinology teaching. China Contin Med Educ. 2021;13:31–4.
  20. Liu M, Ba T. Application of standardized patients endocrinology teaching teachers play. China Contin Med Educ. 2019;11:40–2.
  21. Mou P. Analysis of the significance of scenario simulation teaching model in the education of thyroid-related eye diseases. Electron J Pract Gynecol Endocrinol. 2020;7:191.
  22. Pu DL, Jiang J, Chen B, Deng WQ, Yang GY, Liao Y, et al. The effectiveness of TSP-scenario simulation teaching method in graduate endocrinology education. Chongqing Med J. 2023;52:3517–20.
  23. Rad AH, Shahrokhi M, Koohmanaee S, Medghalchi N, Atrkar Roshan Z, Mehrabi M, et al. The novel method of teaching physiology and pathophysiology of congenital hypothyroidism to medical students: an educational intervention study. J Compr Pediatr. 2022;13:e130127. · DOI
  24. Sperl-Hillen J, O’Connor PJ, Ekstrom HL, Rush WA, Asche SE, Fernandes OD, et al. Educating resident physicians using virtual case-based simulation improves diabetes management: a randomized controlled trial. Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll. 2014;89:1664–73. · DOI
  25. Sun XM, Liu J. Research on the application of virtual standardized patients in clinical teaching of medical students. Chin Med Rec. 2023;24:97–100.
  26. Tong ZY, Cheng XL, Zhang Y, Shang Y, Han YP. Application of scenario simulation teaching model of multimorbidity co-treatment in standardized training for general practice residents. Chin J Gen Pract. 2023;22:520–3.
  27. Wu D, Tian LL, Zhang XL, Li HF, Sun YH. Research on teachers acting as standardized patients in endocrinology clinical teaching. J Qiqihar Med Univ. 2014;35:2135–6.
  28. Xu J, Li XY, Kong N, Zhang W. Application of the SP combining with MDT teaching method in the clinical training. Med Educ Res Pract. 2018;26:1066–9.
  29. Yang YD, Wang YF. Comparison of teaching effect between SBME method and traditional multimedia teaching method in gestational diabetes mellitus. China Contin Med Educ. 2019;11:14–7.
  30. Zheng JY, Yao DK, Zhu L, Liu ZM. Study of the introduction of the student as standard patient in the clinical teaching of endocrinology. Chin J Med Educ Res. 2010;9:648–50.
  31. Zhou L. Research on the application of virtual simulation laboratory systems in endocrinology physiology and pathophysiology practicum teaching. J Imaging Res Med Appl. 2017;1:255–6.
  32. Bonnetain E, Boucheix JM, Hamet M, Freysz M. Benefits of computer screen-based simulation in learning cardiac arrest procedures. Med Educ. 2010;44:716–22. · DOI
  33. Youngblood P, Harter PM, Srivastava S, Moffett S, Heinrichs WL, Dev P. Design, development, and evaluation of an online virtual emergency department for training trauma teams. Simul Healthc J Soc Simul Healthc. 2008;3:146–53. · DOI
  34. Battista A. An activity theory perspective of how scenario-based simulations support learning: a descriptive analysis. Adv Simul Lond Engl. 2017;2:23. · DOI
  35. Weaver M, Erby L. Standardized patients: a promising tool for health education and health promotion. Health Promot Pract. 2012;13:169–74. · DOI
  36. Legoux C, Gerein R, Boutis K, Barrowman N, Plint A. Retention of critical procedural skills after simulation training: a systematic review. AEM Educ Train. 2021;5:e10536. · DOI
  37. Friederichs H, Marschall B, Weissenstein A. Simulation-based mastery learning in medical students: skill retention at 1-year follow up. Med Teach. 2019;41:539–46. · DOI
  38. Kahol K, Ashby A, Smith M, Ferrara JJ. Quantitative evaluation of retention of surgical skills learned in simulation. J Surg Educ. 2010;67:421–6. · DOI
  39. Kim J, Park JH, Shin S. Effectiveness of simulation-based nursing education depending on fidelity: a meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:152. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wu, Z., Huang, Y., Lyu, L., Huang, Y., & Ping, F.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
ORCID
Wu, Zeyu
Venue
BMC Medical Education
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2024-09-30
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
1069-1069
ISSN
1472-6920 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1186/s12909-024-06010-z
PMC
PMC11443629
OpenAlex
W4402965509
Cited by
15
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • BMC Medical Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Peking Union Medical College Hospital (National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding 2022-PUMCH-B-015)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
Keywords
simulation-based training, endocrinology education, medical trainees, knowledge acquisition, clinical skills, student satisfaction, student learning interest
MeSH terms
Simulation Training, Clinical Competence, Education, Medical, Endocrinology, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review