Conceptions of decision-making capacity in psychiatry: interviews with Swedish psychiatrists
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Decision-making capacity is a key concept in contemporary healthcare ethics. Previous research has mainly focused on philosophical, conceptual issues or on evaluation of different tools for assessing patients' capacity. The aim of the present study is to investigate how the concept and its normative role are understood in Swedish psychiatric care. Of special interest for present purposes are the relationships between decisional capacity and psychiatric disorders and between health law and practical ethics. METHODS: Eight in-depth interviews were conducted with Swedish psychiatrists. The interviews were analysed according to descriptive qualitative content analysis in which categories and sub-categories were distilled from the material. RESULTS: Decision-making capacity was seen as dependent on understanding, insight, evaluation, reasoning, and abilities related to making and communicating a choice. However, also the actual content of the decision was held as relevant. There was an ambivalence regarding the relationship between psychiatric disorders and capacity and a tendency to regard psychiatric patients who made unwise treatment decisions as decisionally incapable. However, in cases relating to patients with somatic illnesses, the assumption was rather that patients who made unwise decisions were imprudent but yet decisionally capable. CONCLUSIONS: The respondents' conceptions of decision-making capacity were mainly in line with standard theories. However, the idea that capacity also includes aspects relating to the content of the decision clearly deviates from the standard view. The tendency to regard imprudent choices by psychiatric patients as betokening lack of decision-making capacity differs from the view taken of such choices in somatic care. This difference merits further investigations.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A study by Sjöstrand et al. (2015) found that professionals who perceived patients as making unwise treatment decisions were more likely to judge them incapable of decision-making.
“A study by Sjöstrand et al. (2015) found that professionals who perceived patients as making unwise treatment decisions were more likely to judge them incapable of decision-making [177].”
From Factors Associated with Perceived Coercion in Adults Receiving Psychiatric Care: A Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as [177]
The Abstract (Results) and Discussion ('A difference between somatic and psychiatric patients?') report that interviewed Swedish psychiatrists tended to judge psychiatric patients who made unwise treatment decisions as lacking capacity. The claim broadens this finding to professionals and patients generally; the paper says the presumption was not made for patients in somatic care. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001 · Cited by 20,772 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The sub-categories were then sorted into wider categories [27,28].”
BackgroundQualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines
Malterud, K. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05627-6 · Cited by 5,014 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The sub-categories were then sorted into wider categories [27,28].”
BackgroundAssessing patients' capacities to consent to treatment
Appelbaum, P. S., & Grisso, T. (1988) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198812223192504 · Cited by 1,399 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Hence, when subcategories were in line with the main aspects of capacity described in the theoretical literature, the established concepts of understanding, appreciation, reasoning and choice were used [4,5].”
BackgroundInfluentialProcess Tracing and Elite Interviewing: A Case for Non-probability Sampling
Tansey, O. (2007) · PS Political Science & Politics · doi:10.1017/s1049096507071211 · Cited by 1,034 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The respondents were recruited continuously during the project, partly through chain-referral, according to a purposive sampling method [24], with the aim of covering views and experiences from psychiatrists with different backgrounds and experiences.”
MethodAssessing Competence to Consent to Treatment: A Guide for Physicians and Other Health Prefessionals
Grisso, T., & Appelbaum, P. S. (1998) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195103724.001.0001 · Cited by 823 · see citing works
The MacCAT-T: a clinical tool to assess patients' capacities to make treatment decisions
(1997) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/ps.48.11.1415 · Cited by 704 · cited 1× · see citing works
“There is an extensive literature on philosophical aspects of decision-making capacity [4], and several empirical studies on standards of capacity and clinical assessments of capacity have been conducted [6-13].”
BackgroundDeciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making
Buchanan, A. E., & Brock, D. W. (1990) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139171946 · Cited by 516 · see citing works
Assessing Competence to Consent to Treatment: A Guide for Physicians and Other Health Professionals
Sadoff, R. (1999) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/ps.50.3.425 · Cited by 415 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Impulse control is typically not discussed in the standard literature on decisionmaking capacity [4,5,31].”
BackgroundPrinciples of Biomedical Ethics
Athar, S. (2012) · Journal of the Islamic Medical Association of North America · doi:10.5915/43-3-8476 · Cited by 335 · cited 3× · see citing works
“According to the standard view of the normative role of autonomy in healthcare, respect for autonomy means that patients have a right to choose and a right to accept or decline information [1].”
BackgroundInformed Consent and the Capacity for Voluntarism
Roberts, L. W. (2002) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.159.5.705 · Cited by 268 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Rather, it has been analysed as part of a separate capacity for voluntary choice [4,32].”
BackgroundVincent, N. (2012) · doi:10.1093/actrade/9780199582877.003.0001 · Cited by 266 · cited 1×
“Our results may indeed lend support to the wellknown allegation of a double standard when comparing psychiatric and somatic patients [2,35].”
Mental capacity in psychiatric patients: Systematic review
Okai, D., Owen, G., McGuire, H., Singh, S., Churchill, R., & Hotopf, M. (2007) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.106.035162 · Cited by 262 · cited 4× · see citing works
“However, even in severe cases of mental illness, decisional capacity may be retained [7,11-13].”
BackgroundInfluentialFusion of mental health and incapacity legislation
Dawson, J., & SZMUKLER, G. I. (2006) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.188.6.504 · Cited by 252 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Laws on involuntary psychiatric treatment typically focus on presence of (severe) mental illness, need of treatment, or danger to self or others – not on the patient’s ability to make autonomous decisions [2,14-16].”
BackgroundCompetence to Make Treatment Decisions in Anorexia Nervosa: Thinking Processes and Values
Tan, J. O. A., Stewart, A., Fitzpatrick, R. M., & Hope, R. A. (2006) · Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology · doi:10.1353/ppp.2007.0032 · Cited by 247 · cited 4× · see citing works
“For instance, it has been argued that decisional capacity requires a set of values or goals that is authentic to the decision-maker, and that decisions should be in line with these to qualify as competent [18,29].”
BackgroundInfluentialDepression and decision-making capacity for treatment or research: a systematic review
Hindmarch, T., Hotopf, M., & Owen, G. S. (2013) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/1472-6939-14-54 · Cited by 178 · cited 1× · see citing works
“incorrigible beliefs that no one cares about whether or not the person lives or dies (as in the case described by one of the respondents above), that nothing will be better, or unreasonable beliefs about personal guilt [34].”
BackgroundOwen, G. S., Richardson, G., David, A. S., Szmukler, G., Hayward, P., & Hotopf, M. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39580.546597.be · Cited by 172 · cited 3× · see citing works
“However, even in severe cases of mental illness, decisional capacity may be retained [7,11-13].”
BackgroundGunn, M. C., Wong, J., Clare, I., & Holland, A. (1999) · Medical Law Review · doi:10.1093/medlaw/7.3.269 · Cited by 144 · cited 10× · see citing works
“Hence, when subcategories were in line with the main aspects of capacity described in the theoretical literature, the established concepts of understanding, appreciation, reasoning and choice were used [4,5].”
BackgroundInfluentialDetention of the mentally ill in Europe – a review
Zinkler, M., & Priebe, S. (2002) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0447.2002.02268.x · Cited by 128 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Laws on involuntary psychiatric treatment typically focus on presence of (severe) mental illness, need of treatment, or danger to self or others – not on the patient’s ability to make autonomous decisions [2,14-16].”
BackgroundMarson, D. C., Earnst, K. S., Jamil, F., Bartolucci, A. A., & Harrell, L. E. (2000) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb06887.x · Cited by 122 · cited 1× · see citing works
“There is an extensive literature on philosophical aspects of decision-making capacity [4], and several empirical studies on standards of capacity and clinical assessments of capacity have been conducted [6-13].”
BackgroundA comparison of mental health legislation from diverse Commonwealth jurisdictions
Fistein, E., Holland, A. J., Clare, I. C. H., & Gunn, M. J. (2009) · International Journal of Law and Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2009.02.006 · Cited by 96 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Laws on involuntary psychiatric treatment typically focus on presence of (severe) mental illness, need of treatment, or danger to self or others – not on the patient’s ability to make autonomous decisions [2,14-16].”
BackgroundDecisional Capacity of Severely Depressed Patients Requiring Electroconvulsive Therapy
Lapid, M. I., Rummans, T. A., Poole, K. L., Pankratz, V. S., Maurer, M. S., Rasmussen, K. G., Philbrick, K. L., & Appelbaum, P. S. (2003) · Journal of Ect · doi:10.1097/00124509-200306000-00002 · Cited by 78 · cited 2× · see citing works
“However, even in severe cases of mental illness, decisional capacity may be retained [7,11-13].”
BackgroundOwen, G. S., SZMUKLER, G. I., Richardson, G., David, A. S., Raymont, V., Freyenhagen, F., Martin, W., & Hotopf, M. H. (2013) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.112.123976 · Cited by 72 · cited 3× · see citing works
“However, even in severe cases of mental illness, decisional capacity may be retained [7,11-13].”
BackgroundAssessment of Decision-Making Capacity: Views and Experiences of Consultation Psychiatrists
Seyfried, L. S., Ryan, K. A., & Kim, S. Y. H. (2012) · Psychosomatics · doi:10.1016/j.psym.2012.08.001 · Cited by 60 · cited 1× · see citing works
“There is an extensive literature on philosophical aspects of decision-making capacity [4], and several empirical studies on standards of capacity and clinical assessments of capacity have been conducted [6-13].”
BackgroundEthical deliberations about involuntary treatment: interviews with Swedish psychiatrists
Sjöstrand, M., Sandman, L., Karlsson, P., Helgesson, G., Eriksson, S., & Juth, N. (2015) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-015-0029-5 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Self-citationDo Clinicians Follow a Risk-Sensitive Model of Capacity-Determination? An Experimental Video Survey
Kim, S. Y. H., Caine, E. D., Swan, J. G., & Appelbaum, P. S. (2006) · Psychosomatics · doi:10.1176/appi.psy.47.4.325 · Cited by 44 · cited 1× · see citing works
“There is an extensive literature on philosophical aspects of decision-making capacity [4], and several empirical studies on standards of capacity and clinical assessments of capacity have been conducted [6-13].”
BackgroundDeciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making
Vandeveer, D., Buchanan, A. E., & Brock, D. W. (2011) · doi:10.2307/2107760 · Cited by 32
Mental health legislation should respect decision making capacity
Doyal, L., & Sheather, J. (2005) · British medical journal · doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7530.1467 · Cited by 29 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In contrast to this, it has been argued that lack of decision-making capacity should be a necessary criterion for involuntary treatment in psychiatric care just as in somatic care [2,16,17].”
BackgroundAuthenticity and psychiatric disorder: does autonomy of personal preferences matter
Sjöstrand, M., & Juth, N. (2014) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-013-9509-x · Cited by 26 · cited 4× · see citing works
“The idea is controversial as both the precise meaning and normative relevance of authenticity are contested [2,29,30].”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationMental health legislation and decision making capacity: Capacity is more complex than it looks
Tan, J. O. A., & Hope, T. (2006) · British medical journal · doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7533.119 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
3 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [2]Tännsjö T. Coercive care: the ethics of choice in health and medicine. London; New York: Routledge; 1999.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ethical deliberations about involuntary treatment: interviews with Swedish psychiatrists
Sjöstrand, M., Sandman, L., Karlsson, P., Helgesson, G., Eriksson, S., & Juth, N. (2015) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-015-0029-5 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
“It was often presumed that patients in need of compulsory treatment were also deci-sionally incapable [42].”
BackgroundSelf-citationRodenburg‐Vandenbussche, S., Carlier, I. V. E., van Vliet, I. M., van Hemert, A. M., Stiggelbout, A. M., & Zitman, F. G. (2019) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.13285 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Juliá‐Sanchis, R., García‐Sanjuán, S., Martí, M. F. Z., & Cabañero‐Martínez, M. J. (2019) · Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/jpm.12539 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“Laws on involuntary psychiatric treatment focus on the presence of severe mental illness, need of treatment or danger to self or others but not on the patient's ability to make autono‐ mous decisions (Sjöstrand et al., 2015).”
BackgroundDisagreement Between Clinicians and Score in Decision-Making Capacity of Critically Ill Patients*
Bertrand, P.-M., Pereira, B., Adda, M., Timsit, J., Wolff, M., Hilbert, G., Gruson, D., Garrouste-Orgeas, M., Argaud, L., Constantin, J., et al. (2018) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000003550 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Factors Associated with Perceived Coercion in Adults Receiving Psychiatric Care: A Scoping Review
Lessard-Deschênes, C., Pariseau-Legault, P., Billé, V., Sergerie-Richard, S., Hudson, E., Silva, B., Drouin, J.-S., Désilets, M., & Goulet, M.-H. (2025) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare13151868 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Tibullo, L., Esquinas, A. M., Vargas, M., Fabbo, A., Micillo, F., Parisi, A. M., & Vargas, N. (2018) · European Geriatric Medicine · doi:10.1007/s41999-018-0121-8 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
강제입원의 법적 기준에 대한 고찰 : 입원적합성 심사에 참고할 해외 사례의 소개를 포함하여
혜수, 김., 용민, 안., & 종익, 박. (2018) · doi:10.4306/jknpa.2018.57.1.43 · Cited by 6
Evaluating Decision-Making Capacity
Iseli, L. M., Wangmo, T., Hermann, H., Trachsel, M., & Elger, B. S. (2018) · GeroPsych · doi:10.1024/1662-9647/a000186 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Stars, I., Konstantinova, K., Rozenberga, E. E., Olsena, S., & Baidina, K. (2025) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare13121416 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“The interviews’ guiding questions were based on the definition of supported decision making [36–38] and informed by a literature review on similar issues concerning service users [16,39], family caregivers [20,40,41], and healthcare professionals [42,43].”
Pons, E. V., Barba, A. C., Hastings, J., Männikkö, M., & Ruiz, S. P. (2021) · Psychiatry International · doi:10.3390/psychiatryint2020010 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“(2015), even in severe cases of mental illness, decisional capacity can be retained, and the rate of decision-making incapacity may not be very different among psychiatric inpatients compared to general hospital inpatients in similar circumstances of disease burden [35].”
BackgroundAssessing autonomy in psychiatric practice: a narrative literature review
Disha, T. I., Papavasiliou, E., & Gill, S. (2025) · Discover Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s44192-025-00287-2 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Others have raised doubt about determining authentic desires [85, 87, 88].”
Legal Issues (Surrogacy Laws, Informed Consent)
Fabbo, A. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-26664-6_37 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Interdisciplinary medication reviews of psychiatric patients – A mixed method evaluation
Dalin, D., Holst, S. S., Dalin, L. S. Ø. E., & Vermehren, C. (2025) · Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy · doi:10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100584 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“…medication when conducting medication reviews, which are not seen amongst somatic patients, e.g., • Impaired cognitive capabilities of patients 20 – 23 • Possible drug addiction 24,25 • Compulsory treatment order • Challenges in the collaboration between GP and psychiatrist 23 • GPs lack of…”
Pavlović, B., Tiosavljević, D., & Sinadinović, D. (2019) · Srpski arhiv za celokupno lekarstvo · doi:10.2298/sarh190514108p · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“depressive and manic episodes in the spectrum of mood disorders) can considerably compromise the decision-making capacity, so a certain number of patients are considered incompetent [17].”
BackgroundIs decision-making capacity an “essentially contested” concept in pediatrics?
Clercq, E. D., Ruhe, K. M., Rost, M., & Elger, B. S. (2017) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-017-9768-z · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Smolenski, J. (2026) · Psychiatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.psc.2026.02.001
Kırpınar, M., Torun, A., Dağoğlu, Z., & Demirel, Ö. (2026) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/1556-4029.70340
What is veteran suicide prevention really about? Questions from the community to researchers
Fox, B. M. (2025) · Qualitative Research in Medicine & Healthcare · doi:10.4081/qrmh.2024.13323
Lalić, H. (2016) · Arhiv za Higijenu Rada i Toksikologiju · doi:10.1515/aiht-2016-67-2707
- Authors
- Sjöstrand, M., Karlsson, P., Sandman, L., Helgesson, G., Eriksson, S., & Juth, N.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- Linköping University (SE)
- Uppsala University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Sjöstrand, Manne
- Venue
- BMC Medical Ethics
- Published
- 2015-05-21
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 34-34
- ISSN
- 1472-6939 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4447019
- OpenAlex
- W2119612725
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 3.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMC Medical Ethics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DiVA (Linkoping University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Uppsala University Publications (Uppsala University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Vetenskapsrådet (2014‐4024)
- Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd (2014–4024)
- Svenska Läkaresällskapet
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
- Keywords
- decision-making capacity, health law, applied ethics, imprudence, psychiatric nursing
- MeSH terms
- Attitude of Health Personnel, Mental Disorders, Choice Behavior, Decision Making, Humans, Psychiatry, Sweden, Mental Competency, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review