The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Are physicians on the same page about do-not-resuscitate? To examine individual physicians’ influence on do-not-resuscitate decision-making: a retrospective and observational study
Open accessAbstract
Background: Individual physicians and physician-associated factors may influence patients’/surrogates’ autonomous decision-making, thus influencing the practice of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders. The objective of this study was to examine the influence of individual attending physicians on signing a DNR order. Methods: This study was conducted in closed model, surgical intensive care units in a university-affiliated teaching hospital located in Northern Taiwan. The medical records of patients, admitted to the surgical intensive care units for the first time between June 1, 2011 and December 31, 2013 were reviewed and data collected. We used Kaplan–Meier survival curves with log-rank test and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models to compare the time from surgical intensive care unit admission to do-not-resuscitate orders written for patients for each individual physician. The outcome variable was the time from surgical ICU admission to signing a DNR order. Results: We found that each individual attending physician’s likelihood of signing do-not-resuscitate orders for their patients was significantly different from each other. Some attending physicians were more likely to write do-not-resuscitate orders for their patients, and other attending physicians were less likely to do so. Conclusion: Our study reported that individual attending physicians had influence on patients’/surrogates’ do-not-resuscitate decision-making. Future studies may be focused on examining the reasons associated with the difference of each individual physician in the likelihood of signing a do-not-resuscitate order.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Physicians have a direct influence on the timing of DNACPR discussions,33”
From Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation decision-making process: scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [33]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Other reasons for lack of involvement were down to physicians’ abilities to communicate with patients/surrogate decision-makers about DNACPR decision-making; 15% of physicians prefer to discuss the topic only if the patients/surrogate decision-makers bring it up.33”
From Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation decision-making process: scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [33]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Typically, end-of-life issues were identified as being discussed prior to becoming severely ill,31 being informed of a poor prognosis and/or referred for palliative care,32 having 4–6 months to live,33 disease progressed to terminal stage,34 last week of life,35 health deteriorated,3639 person moving to a residential setting,39 at a care plan meeting39 and inpatient discharge.38”
From Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation decision-making process: scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [33]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 41
- Luce JM. A history of resolving conflicts over end-of-life care in intensive care units in the United States. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(8):1623–9. · DOI
- Ho TH, Barbera L, Saskin R, Lu H, Neville BA, Earle CC. Trends in the aggressiveness of end-of-life cancer care in the universal health care system of Ontario. Canada J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(12):1587–91. · DOI
- Earle CC, Landrum MB, Souza JM, Neville BA, Weeks JC, Ayanian JZ. Aggressiveness of cancer care near the end of life: is it a quality-of-care issue? J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(23):3860–6. · DOI
- Choi Y, Keam B, Kim TM, Lee SH, Kim DW, Heo DS. Cancer treatment near the end-of-life becomes more aggressive: changes in trend during 10 years at a single institute. Cancer Res Treat. 2015;47(4):555–63. · DOI
- Norris K, Merriman MP, Curtis JR, Asp C, Tuholske L, Byock IR. Next of kin perspectives on the experience of end-of-life care in a community setting. J Palliat Med. 2007;10(5):1101–15. · DOI
- Teno JM, Mor V, Ward N, Roy J, Clarridge B, Wennberg JE, et al. Bereaved family member perceptions of quality of end-of-life care in U.S. regions with high and low usage of intensive care unit care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(11):1905–11. · DOI
- Fisher ES, Wennberg DE, Stukel TA, Gottlieb DJ, Lucas FL, Pinder EL. The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 2: health outcomes and satisfaction with care. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(4):288–98. · DOI
- Manalo MF. End-of-life decisions about withholding or withdrawing therapy: medical, ethical, and religio-cultural considerations. Palliat Care. 2013;7:1–5.
- Carveth S. Standards for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and emergency cardiac care (ECC). V. Medicolegal considerations and recommendations. JAMA. 1974;227(7):864–8. · DOI
- Burns JP. Encyclopedia of Bioethics. Macmillan Reference USA. In: Post SG, editor. DNR (Do Not Resuscitate); 2004. p. 683–5.
- Golden SM. Do not resuscitate orders: a matter of life and death in New York. J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1988;4:449–67.
- Chen YY, Gordon NH, Connors AF Jr, Garland A, Lai HS, Youngner SJ. Factors associated with two different protocols of do-not-resuscitate orders in a medical ICU*. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(10):2188–96. · DOI
- Chen YY, Gordon NH, Connors AF, Garland A, Chang SC, Youngner SJ. Two distinct do-not-resuscitate protocols leaving less to the imagination: an observational study using propensity score matching. BMC Med. 2014;12:146. · DOI
- Yuen JK, Reid MC, Fetters MD. Hospital do-not-resuscitate orders: why they have failed and how to fix them. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26(7):791–7. · DOI
- Burns JP, Edwards J, Johnson J, Cassem NH, Truog RD. Do-not-resuscitate order after 25 years. Crit Care Med. 2003;31(5):1543–50. · DOI
- Morrell ED, Brown BP, Qi R, Drabiak K, Helft PR. The do-not-resuscitate order: associations with advance directives, physician specialty and documentation of discussion 15 years after the patient self-determination act. J Med Ethics. 2008;34(9):642–7. · DOI
- Phua J, Joynt GM, Nishimura M, Deng Y, Myatra SN, Chan YH, et al. Withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments in intensive care units in Asia. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(3):363–71. · DOI
- Lin KH, Chen YS, Chou NK, Huang SJ, Wu CC, Chen YY. The associations between the religious background, social supports, and do-not-resuscitate orders in Taiwan: an observational study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(3):e2571. · DOI
- Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association. Guidelines for the appropriate use of do-not-resuscitate orders. JAMA. 1991;265(14):1868–71. · DOI
- Decisions Relating to Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: a joint statement from the British Medical Association, the Resuscitation Council (UK) and the Royal College of Nursing. J Med Ethics. 2001;27(5):310–6. · DOI
- Baskett PJF, Steen PA, Bossaert L. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005: Section 8. The ethics of resuscitation and end-of-life decisions. Resuscitation. 2005;67, Supplement 1(0):S171-SS80. · DOI
- VanVoorhis CRW, Morgan BL. Understanding power and rules of thumb for determining sample sizes. Tut Quant Methods Psychol. 2007;3(2):43–50. · DOI
- Cullen DJ, Civetta JM, Briggs BA, Ferrara LC. Therapeutic intervention scoring system: a method for quantitative comparison of patient care. Crit Care Med. 1974;2(2):57–60. · DOI
- Sullivan LM. Multivariable Methods. Essentials of Biostatistics in Public Health. 3rd ed. Burlington: Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC; 2017. p. 193–222.
- Groselj U, Orazem M, Kanic M, Vidmar G, Grosek S. Experiences of Slovene ICU physicians with end-of-life decision making: a nation-wide survey. Med Sci Monit. 2014;20:2007–12. · DOI
- Keating NL, Landrum MB, Rogers SO Jr, Baum SK, Virnig BA, Huskamp HA, et al. Physician factors associated with discussions about end-of-life care. Cancer. 2010;116(4):998–1006. · DOI
- Hilden HM, Louhiala P, Palo J. End of life decisions: attitudes of Finnish physicians. J Med Ethics. 2004;30(4):362–5. · DOI
- Covinsky KE, Fuller JD, Yaffe K, Johnston CB, Hamel MB, Lynn J, et al. Communication and decision-making in seriously ill patients: findings of the SUPPORT project. The Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(5, suppl):S187–S93. · DOI
- Kelly WF, Eliasson AH, Stocker DJ, Hnatiuk OW. Do specialists differ on do-not-resuscitate decisions? Chest. 2002;121(3):957–63. · DOI
- Lipton HL. Do-not-resuscitate decisions in a community hospital. Incidence, implications, and outcomes. JAMA. 1986;256(9):1164–9. · DOI
- Luce JM. Ethical principles in critical care. JAMA. 1990;263(5):696–700. · DOI
- Henneman EA, Baird B, Bellamy PE, Faber LL, Oye RK. Effect of do-not-resuscitate orders on the nursing care of critically ill patients. Am J Crit Care. 1994;3(6):467–72. · DOI
- Sherman DA, Branum K. Critical care nurses' perceptions of appropriate care of the patient with orders not to resuscitate. Heart & lung : the journal of critical care. 1995;24(4):321–9. · DOI
- Beach MC, Morrison RS. The effect of do-not-resuscitate orders on physician decision-making. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50(12):2057–61. · DOI
- von Gunten CF, Ferris FD, Emanuel LL. The patient-physician relationship. Ensuring competency in end-of-life care: communication and relational skills. JAMA. 2000;284(23):3051–7. · DOI
- Piers RD, Benoit DD, Schrauwen WJ, Van Den Noortgate NJ. Do-not-resuscitate decisions in a large tertiary hospital: differences between wards and results of a hospital-wide intervention. Acta Clin Belg. 2011;66(2):116–22.
- Granja C, Teixeira-Pinto A, Costa-Pereira A. Attitudes towards do-not-resuscitate decisions: differences among health professionals in a Portuguese hospital. Intensive Care Med. 2001;27(3):555–8. · DOI
- Jaul E, Zabari Y, Brodsky J. Spiritual background and its association with the medical decision of, DNR at terminal life stages. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2014;58(1):25–9. · DOI
- Abdallah FS, Radaeda MS, Gaghama MK, Salameh B. Intensive care unit physician's attitudes on do not resuscitate order in Palestine. Indian J Palliat Care. 2016;22(1):38–41. · DOI
- Dzeng E, Colaianni A, Roland M, Chander G, Smith TJ, Kelly MP, et al. Influence of institutional culture and policies on do-not-resuscitate decision making at the end of life. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(5):812–9. · DOI · Paper page
- Chen YY, Connors AF, Garland A. Effect of decisions to withhold life support on prolonged survival*. Chest. 2008;133(6):1312–8. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation decision-making process: scoping review
Doody, O., Davidson, H., & Lombard, J. (2025) · BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care · doi:10.1136/spcare-2023-004573 · Cited by 10
“Aljohaney and Bawazir 72 recommended an evidence-based curriculum providing instruction for improving discussion and Chen et al, 33 35 Einstein et al , 51 El Sayed et al 67 and Fan and Hsieh 36 all highlight the need for training to enhance communication skills.”
BackgroundAlwazzeh, M. J., Aljoudi, A. S., Subbarayalu, A. V., Alharbi, A. F., Aldowayan, A. K., Alshahrani, S. F., Alamri, A. M., & Almuhanna, F. A. (2023) · Electronic Journal of General Medicine · doi:10.29333/ejgm/12901 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, Y.-Y., Su, M., Huang, S.-C., Chu, T.-S., Lin, M.-T., Chiu, Y.-C., & Lin, K.-H.
- Affiliations
- National Taiwan University (TW)
- New York University (US)
- National Taiwan University Hospital (TW)
- Asia University (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Chiu, Yu-Chun
- Lin, Kuan-Han
- Venue
- BMC Medical Ethics
- Published
- 2019-12
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 92-92
- ISSN
- 1472-6939 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6894148
- OpenAlex
- W2992983747
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BMC Medical Ethics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 103-2511-S-002-008-MY5, MOST 108-2634-F-002-023)
- National Taiwan University Hospital (105-N3316)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Keywords
- do-not-resuscitate orders, attending physicians, surgical intensive care unit, physician practice variation, surrogate decision-making, patient autonomy
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Decision Making, Female, Hospitals, University, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Male, Middle Aged, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Physician's Role, Physicians, Retrospective Studies, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Taiwan, Time Factors, Proportional Hazards Models, Resuscitation Orders, Kaplan-Meier Estimate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review