Development of a targeted client communication intervention to women using an electronic maternal and child health registry: a qualitative study
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Background: Targeted client communication (TCC) using text messages can inform, motivate and remind pregnant and postpartum women of timely utilization of care. The mixed results of the effectiveness of TCC interventions points to the importance of theory based interventions that are co-design with users. The aim of this paper is to describe the planning, development, and evaluation of a theory led TCC intervention, tailored to pregnant and postpartum women and automated from the Palestinian electronic maternal and child health registry. Methods: We used the Health Belief Model to develop interview guides to explore women’s perceptions of antenatal care (ANC), with a focus on high-risk pregnancy conditions (anemia, hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, gestational diabetes mellitus, and fetal growth restriction), and untimely ANC attendance, issues predefined by a national expert panel as being of high interest. We performed 18 in-depth interviews with women, and eight with healthcare providers in public primary healthcare clinics in the West Bank and Gaza. Grounding on the results of the in-depth interviews, we used concepts from the Model of Actionable Feedback, social nudging and Enhanced Active Choice to compose the TCC content to be sent as text messages. We assessed the acceptability and understandability of the draft text messages through unstructured interviews with local health promotion experts, healthcare providers, and pregnant women. Results: We found low awareness of the importance of timely attendance to ANC, and the benefits of ANC for pregnancy outcomes. We identified knowledge gaps and beliefs in the domains of low awareness of susceptibility to, and severity of, anemia, hypertension, and diabetes complications in pregnancy. To increase the utilization of ANC and bridge the identified gaps, we iteratively composed actionable text messages with users, using recommended message framing models. We developed algorithms to trigger tailored text messages with higher intensity for women with a higher risk profile documented in the electronic health registry. Conclusions: We developed an optimized TCC intervention underpinned by behavior change theory and concepts, and co-designed with users following an iterative process. The electronic maternal and child health registry can serve as a unique platform for TCC interventions using text messages.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Human oversight in AI-driven healthcare is important to mitigate risks and enhance patient safety.
“A study conducted by Amann et al., (2020) [26] also supports the need for balanced integration, emphasizing the importance of human oversight in AI-driven healthcare to mitigate risks and enhance patient safety.”
From Leading with AI in critical care nursing: challenges, opportunities, and the human factor (2024) · cites this paper as Amann et al., (2020) [26]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 234
- Authors
- Bogale, B., Mørkrid, K., O’Donnell, B., Ghanem, B., Abu Ward, I., Abu Khader, K., Isbeih, M., Frost, M., Baniode, M., Hijaz, T., Awwad, T., Rabah, Y., & Frøen, J. F.
- Affiliations
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO)
- World Health Organization (CH)
- University of Oslo (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Frøen, J. Frederik
- ORCID
- Venue
- BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
- Published
- 2020-01-06
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-1
- ISSN
- 1472-6947 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6945530
- OpenAlex
- W2998445959
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 6
- FWCI
- 29.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (617639)
- Research council of Norway (234376, 223269)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Keywords
- text messaging, antenatal care utilization, pregnant women, postpartum women, electronic health registry, maternal and child health, Health Belief Model, high-risk pregnancy, anemia in pregnancy, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, gestational diabetes mellitus, fetal growth restriction, message framing, co-design, acceptability, West Bank and Gaza
- MeSH terms
- Child Health, Communication, Electronics, Family, Female, Humans, Male, Patients, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Registries, Women
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review