Cited by 17Interprofessional Education and CollaborationNursing Roles and PracticesTeam Dynamics and Performance

Nurse practitioner interactions in acute and long-term care: an exploration of the role of knotworking in supporting interprofessional collaboration

Open access
Hurlock-Chorostecki, Christina, van Soeren, Mary, MacMillan, Kathleen, Sidani, Souraya, Donald, Faith, Reeves, Scott·2015·BMC Nursing

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Interprofessional care ensures high quality healthcare. Effective interprofessional collaboration is required to enable interprofessional care, although within the acute care hospital setting interprofessional collaboration is considered suboptimal. The integration of nurse practitioner roles into the acute and long-term care settings is influencing enhanced care. What remains unknown is how the nurse practitioner role enacts interprofessional collaboration or enables interprofessional care to promote high quality care. The study aim was to understand how nurse practitioners employed in acute and long-term care settings enable interprofessional collaboration and care. METHOD: Nurse practitioner interactions with other healthcare professionals were observed throughout the work day. These interactions were explored within the context of "knotworking" to create an understanding of their social practices and processes supporting interprofessional collaboration. Healthcare professionals who worked with nurse practitioners were invited to share their perceptions of valued role attributes and impacts. RESULTS: Twenty-four nurse practitioners employed at six hospitals participated. 384 hours of observation provided 1,284 observed interactions for analysis. Two types of observed interactions are comparable to knotworking. Rapid interactions resemble the traditional knotworking described in earlier studies, while brief interactions are a new form of knotworking with enhanced qualities that more consistently result in interprofessional care. Nurse practitioners were the most common initiators of brief interactions. CONCLUSIONS: Brief interactions reveal new qualities of knotworking with more consistent interprofessional care results. A general process used by nurse practitioners, where they practice a combination of both traditional (rapid) knotworking and brief knotworking to enable interprofessional care within acute and long-term care settings, is revealed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12912-015-0102-x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In healthcare, permanent teams are increasingly replaced by fluid combinations of expertise (knots) corresponding to the problem at hand.

    “In healthcare, permanent teams are increasingly replaced by fluid combinations of expertise,”

    From Using activity theory to transform medical work and learning (2021) · cites this paper as Hurlock-Chorostecki et al. 2015

    The Background describes healthcare knotworking as short-lived collaboration among changing participants, and the Discussion describes an NP working within a team of changing professionals. Neither section says that permanent teams are increasingly being replaced; the paper supports the fluid-collaboration aspect, not the claimed trend. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. [1]IOM (Institute of Medicine). Interprofessional education for collaboration: Learning how to improve health from interprofessional models across the continuum of education to practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2013. http://iom.nationalacademies.org/Reports/2013/Interprofessional-Education-for-Collaboration.aspx 24901189
  2. [4]Reeves S Lewin S Espin S Zwarenstein M Interprofessional teamwork for health and social care 2010 Oxford Wiley-Blackwell
  3. [5]Hurlock-Chorostecki C van Soeren M MacMillan K Sidani S Collins L Harbman P Donald F Reeves S A survey of interprofessional activity of acute and long-term care employed nurse practitioners J Am Assoc Nurse Pract 2015 27 9 507 13 25703282
  4. [6]Hurlock-Chorostecki C van Soeren M Goodwin S The acute care nurse practitioner in Ontario: A workforce study Can J Nurs Leadersh 2008 21 4 96 112 19029848
  5. [7]Kleinpell R Ely W Grabenkort R Nurse practitioners and physician assistants in the intensive care unit: An evidence-based review Crit Care Med 2008 36 10 2888 97 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318186ba8c 18766097 · DOI
  6. [8]Keough V Stevenson A Martinovich Z Young R Tanabe P Nurse practitioner certification and practice settings: Implications for education and practice J Nurs Scholarsh 2011 43 2 195 202 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2011.01395.x 21605324 · DOI
  7. [9]van Soeren M Hurlock-Chorostecki C Goodwin S Baker E The primary healthcare nurse practitioner in Ontario: A workforce study Can J Nurs Leadersh 2009 22 2 58 72 10.12927/cjnl.2009.20798 19521161 · DOI
  8. [10]Reeves S Lewin S Interprofessional collaboration in the hospital: Strategies and meanings J Health Serv Res Pol 2004 9 4 218 25 10.1258/1355819042250140 15509407 · DOI
  9. [11]Varpio L Hall P Lingard L Schryer C Interprofessional communication and medical error: A reframing of research questions and approaches Acad Med 2008 83 10 S76 81 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318183e67b 18820507 · DOI
  10. [12]Engestrom Y Engestrom R Vahaaho T Chaklin S Hedegaard M Jensen U When the center does not hold: The importance of knotworking Activity theory and social practice 1999 Aarhus Aarhus University Press
  11. [13]Engestrom Y Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work Ergonomics 2000 43 7 960 74 10.1080/001401300409143 10929830 · DOI
  12. [14]O'Leary KJ Ritter CD Wheeler H Szekendi MK Brinton TS Williams MV Teamwork on inpatient medical units: Assessing attitudes and barriers Qual Saf Health Care 2010 19 2 117 21 10.1136/qshc.2008.028795 20351159 · DOI
  13. [15]Hammersley M Atkinson P Ethnography: Principles in practice 2007 3 London Routledge
  14. [16]Hurlock-Chorostecki C Forchuk C Orchard C Reeves S van Soeren M The value of the hospital-based nurse practitioner role: Development of a team perspective framework J Interprof Care 2013 27 6 501 8 10.3109/13561820.2013.796915 23742237 · DOI
  15. [17]Kilpatrick K Lavoie-Tremblay M Ritchie J Lamothe L Doran D Rochefort C Boundary work and the introduction of acute care nurse practitioners in healthcare teams J Adv Nurs 2012 68 7 1504 15 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05895.x 22117596 · DOI
  16. [19]Connell N Mannion R Conseptualisations of trust in the organisational literature. Some indicators from a complementary perspective J Health Organ Manag 2006 20 5 417 33 10.1108/14777260610701795 17087403 · DOI
  17. [20]Desborough J How nurse practitioners implement their roles Aust Health Rev 2012 36 22 6 10.1071/AH11030 22513015 · DOI
  18. [21]Hurlock-Chorostecki C Forchuk C Orchard C van Soeren M Reeves S Labour saver or building a cohesive interprofessional team? The role of the nurse practitioners within hospitals J Interprof Care 2014 28 3 260 6 10.3109/13561820.2013.867838 24344878 · DOI
  19. [22]Williamson S Twelvetree T Thompson J Beaver K An ethnographic study exploring the role of ward-based advanced nurse practitioners in an acute medical setting J Adv Nurs 2012 68 7 1579 88 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.05970.x 22381131 · DOI
  20. [23]van Soeren M Hurlock-Chorostecki C Reeves S The role of nurse practitioners in hospital settings: Implications for interprofessional practice J Interprof Care 2011 25 245 51 10.3109/13561820.2010.539305 21182436 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hurlock-Chorostecki, C., van Soeren, M., MacMillan, K., Sidani, S., Donald, F., & Reeves, S.
Affiliations
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
  • St George's, University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Reeves, Scott
Venue
BMC Nursing
Published
2015-10-14
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
50-50
ISSN
1472-6955 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2159336873
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Nursing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Keywords
nurse practitioners, knotworking, interprofessional collaboration, interprofessional care, acute care, long-term care, social practices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review