Feasibility of training practice nurses to deliver a psychosocial intervention within a collaborative care framework for people with depression and long-term conditions
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Practice nurses (PNs) deliver much of the chronic disease management in primary care and have been highlighted as appropriately placed within the service to manage patients with long-term physical conditions (LTCs) and co-morbid depression. This nested qualitative evaluation within a service development pilot provided the opportunity to examine the acceptability of a Brief Behavioural Activation (BBA) intervention within a collaborative care framework. Barriers and facilitators to engaging with the intervention from the patient and clinician perspective will be used to guide future service development and research. METHODS: = 4) receiving the intervention participated in semi-structured qualitative interviews. Analysis utilised the four Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) concepts of coherence, cognitive participation, collective action and reflexive monitoring to explore the how this intervention could be implemented in practice. RESULTS: Awareness of depression and the stigma associated with the label of depression meant that, from a patient perspective a PN being available to 'listen' was perceived as valuable. Competing practice priorities, perceived lack of time and resources, and lack of engagement by the whole practice team were considered the greatest barriers to the implementation of this intervention in routine primary care. CONCLUSION: Lack of understanding of, participation in, and support from the whole practice team in the collaborative care model exacerbated the pressures perceived by PNs. The need for formal supervision of PNs to enable them to undertake the role of case manager for patients with depression and long-term conditions is emphasised.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Evaluation of a service development in which Practice Nurses deliver a psychosocial intervention to patients with long-term conditions suggests that patients valued the time and availability of Practice Nurses to listen to their concerns [49].
“Similarly, evaluation of a service development in which Practice Nurses deliver a psychosocial intervention to patients with long-term conditions, suggests that patients valued the time and availability of Practice Nurses to listen to their concerns [49].”
From Can support workers from AgeUK deliver an intervention to support older people with anxiety and depression? A qualitative evaluation (2019) · cites this paper as [49]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 25
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [25]Lewinsohn PM, Biglan A, Zeiss AS. Behavioral treatment of depression. In P.O. Davidson (Ed.), The behavioral management of anxiety, depression and pain. New York: Brunner/Mazel; 1976. pp. 91–146.
- Authors
- Webster, L. A. D., Ekers, D., & Chew-Graham, C. A.
- Affiliations
- Leeds Trinity University (GB)
- Durham University (GB)
- Keele University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Webster, Lisa A. D.
- Venue
- BMC Nursing
- Published
- 2016-12
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-71
- ISSN
- 1472-6955 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5142437
- OpenAlex
- W2560498929
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 3.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BMC Nursing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Keele Research Repository (Keele University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- West Yorkshire and Bassetlaw Commissioning Support Unit
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Keywords
- practice nurses, behavioral activation, depression, chronic disease, collaborative care, psychosocial interventions, implementation barriers and facilitators, Normalisation Process Theory, case management, nursing supervision, primary care, chronic disease management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review