A conceptual model of urgent care sense-making and help-seeking: a qualitative interview study of urgent care users in England
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Theoretical models have sought to comprehend and conceptualise how people seek help from health professionals but it is unclear if such models apply to urgent care. Much previous research does not explain the complex interactions that influence how people make sense of urgent care and how this shapes service use. This paper aims to conceptualise the complexity of sense-making and help-seeking behaviour in peoples' everyday evaluations of when and how to access modern urgent care provision. METHODS: This study comprised longitudinal semi-structured interviews undertaken in the South of England. We purposively sampled participants 75+, 18-26 years, and from East/Central Europe (sub-sample of 41 received a second interview at + 6-12 months). Framework analysis was thematic and comparative. RESULTS: The amount and nature of the effort (work) undertaken to make sense of urgent care was an overarching theme of the analysis. We distinguished three distinct types of work: illness work, moral work and navigation work. These take place at an individual level but are also shared or delegated across social networks and shaped by social context and time. We have developed a conceptual model that shows how people make sense of urgent care through work which then influences help-seeking decisions and action. CONCLUSIONS: There are important intersections between individual work and their social networks, further shaped by social context and time, to influence help-seeking. Recognising different, hidden or additional work for some groups may help design and configure services to support patient work in understanding and navigating urgent care.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Help-seeking for urgent care is a social process comprising illness work, moral work and navigation work.
“Help-seeking for urgent care is a social process comprising illness work (to make sense of symptoms), moral work (to justify choice of service and help-seeking behavior) and navigation work (to access services) (31).”
From Planning and Evaluating Remote Consultation Services: A New Conceptual Framework Incorporating Complexity and Practical Ethics (2021) · cites this paper as [31]
Burden of treatment also includes the effort needed from the patient to access services, which technologies (especially e-consultations) could potentially alleviate.
“Burden of treatment also includes the effort needed from the patient to access services (31, 93), which technologies (especially e-consultations) could potentially alleviate.”
From Planning and Evaluating Remote Consultation Services: A New Conceptual Framework Incorporating Complexity and Practical Ethics (2021) · cites this paper as [31]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 23
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [8]NHS England Transforming urgent and emergency care services in England - Urgent and Emergency Care Review. End of Phase 1 Report 2013 Leeds NHS England
- Authors
- Turnbull, J., Pope, C., Prichard, J., McKenna, G., & Rogers, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Southampton (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Turnbull, Joanne
- Venue
- BMC Health Services Research
- Published
- 2019-07-12
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 481-481
- ISSN
- 1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6624886
- OpenAlex
- W2961724620
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 2.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Institute of Health Research HS&DR programme (14/19/16)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Keywords
- urgent care, help-seeking, sensemaking, conceptual model, moral work, social networks, patient work, service utilization, health care access, youth, older adults, international migrants
- MeSH terms
- Help-Seeking Behavior, Adolescent, Adult, Ambulatory Care, England, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Theoretical, Qualitative Research, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review