Cited by 47Geriatric Care and Nursing HomesHealthcare Quality and ManagementPatient Satisfaction in Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Talking about quality: how ‘quality’ is conceptualized in nursing homes and homecare

Open access

Abstract

Background: The delivery of high-quality service in nursing homes and homecare requires collaboration and shared understanding among managers, employees, users and policy makers from across the healthcare system. However, conceptualizing healthcare professionals’ perception of quality beyond hospital settings (e.g., its perspectives, defining attributes, quality dimensions, contextual factors, dilemmas) has rarely been done. This study therefore explores the meaning of “quality” among healthcare managers and staff in nursing homes and homecare. Methods: The study applies a cross-sectional qualitative design with focus groups and individual interviews, to capture both depth and breadth of conceptualization of quality from healthcare professionals in nursing homes and homecare. We draw our data from 65 managers and staff in nursing homes and homecare services in Norway and the Netherlands. The participants worked as managers (n = 40), registered nurses (RNs) or assistant nurses (n = 25). Results: The analysis identified the two categories and four sub-categories: “Professional issues: more than firefighting” (subcategories “professional pride” and “competence”) and “patient-centered approach: more than covering basic needs” (subcategories “dignity” and “continuity”). Quality in nursing homes and homecare is conceptualized as an ongoing process based on having the “right competence,” good cooperation across professional groups, and patient-centered care, in line with professional pride and dignity for the patients. Conclusion: Based on the understanding of quality among the healthcare professionals in our study, quality should encompass the softer dimensions of professional pride and competence, as well as a patient-centered approach to care. These dimensions should be factors in improvement activities and in daily practice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12913-021-06104-0

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Darzi L, Johnson A. High quality care for all: NHS next stage review final report, vol. 7432. London: The Stationery Office; 2008.
  2. The Norwegian Directorate of Health. Nasjonal handlingsplan for pasientsikkerhet og kvalitetsforbedring 2019–2023 [Norwegian]. Oslo: Ministry of Health and Care Services; 2019.
  3. The Norwegian Directorate of Health. National strategy for quality improvements in health and social services (2005-2015). Oslo: Directorate of Health; 2005.
  4. Ministry of Health and Care Services. Meld.St. 26 (2014-2015) Fremtidens primærhelsetjeneste- nærhet og helhet [Norwegian]. Oslo: Ministry of Health and Care Services; 2014.
  5. Wkkgz (Wet kwaliteit, klachten en geschillen zorg). (chapter 2 art 2 a,b,c) (Dutch) Overeid.nl. 2019. https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0037173/2019-05-01.
  6. Ministry of Health and Care Services. Meld. St. 34. (2015–2016) Verdier i pasientens helsetjeneste. Melding om prioritering [Norwegian]. Oslo: Ministry of Health and Care Services; 2015.
  7. The Norwegian Directorate of Health. Om kvalitet og kvalitetsindikatorer. 2014. https://www.helsedirektoratet.no/statistikk/statistikk/kvalitetsindikatorer/om-kvalitet-og-kvalitetsindikatorer. Accessed 29 Oct 2019.
  8. The Norwegian Directorate of Health. Patient safety program in Safe Hands 24–7. Strategy 2014–2018 [in Norwegian]. 2014. http://www.pasientsikkerhetsprogrammet.no/om-oss/i-kommunene. Accessed 29 Oct 2019.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 47

Metadata

Authors
Aase, I., Ree, E., Johannessen, T., Strømme, T., Ullebust, B., Holen-Rabbersvik, E., Thomsen, L. H., Schibevaag, L., van de Bovenkamp, H., & Wiig, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Stavanger (NO)
  • University of Agder (NO)
  • Stavanger Kommune (NO)
Corresponding author
Aase, Ingunn
Venue
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2021-01-30
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
104-104
ISSN
1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3127708761
Cited by
47
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6
FWCI
10.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Norges Forskningsråd (256681/H10)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Keywords
quality of care, nursing homes, home care, quality concept, healthcare professionals' perceptions, professional pride, competence, patient-centered care, human dignity, continuity of care, interprofessional collaboration, long-term care
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Home Care Services, Humans, Netherlands, Norway, Nursing Homes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review