Cited by 27Health Policy Implementation ScienceHepatitis C virus researchClinical practice guidelines implementation

Mapping the road to elimination: a 5-year evaluation of implementation strategies associated with hepatitis C treatment in the veterans health administration

Open access
Yakovchenko, Vera, Morgan, Timothy R., Chinman, Matthew J., Powell, Byron J., Gonzalez, Rachel, Park, Angela, Malone, Patrick S., Chartier, Maggie +2 more·2021·BMC Health Services Research

Abstract

Background: While few countries and healthcare systems are on track to meet the World Health Organization’s hepatitis C virus (HCV) elimination goals, the US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has been a leader in these efforts. We aimed to determine which implementation strategies were associated with successful national viral elimination implementation within the VHA. Methods: We conducted a five-year, longitudinal cohort study of the VHA Hepatic Innovation Team (HIT) Collaborative between October 2015 and September 2019. Participants from 130 VHA medical centers treating HCV were sent annual electronic surveys about their use of 73 implementation strategies, organized into nine clusters as described by the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change taxonomy. Descriptive and nonparametric analyses assessed strategy use over time, strategy attribution to the HIT, and strategy associations with site HCV treatment volume and rate of adoption, following the Theory of Diffusion of Innovations. Results: Between 58 and 109 medical centers provided responses in each year, including 127 (98%) responding at least once, and 54 (42%) responding in all four implementation years. A median of 13–27 strategies were endorsed per year, and 8–36 individual strategies were significantly associated with treatment volume per year. Data warehousing, tailoring, and patient-facing strategies were most commonly endorsed. One strategy—“identify early adopters to learn from their experiences”—was significantly associated with HCV treatment volume in each year. Peak implementation year was associated with revising professional roles, providing local technical assistance, using data warehousing (i.e., dashboard population management), and identifying and preparing champions. Many of the strategies were driven by a national learning collaborative, which was instrumental in successful HCV elimination. Conclusions: VHA’s tremendous success in rapidly treating nearly all Veterans with HCV can provide a roadmap for other HCV elimination initiatives.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12913-021-07312-4

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 27

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [24]Rogers E Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed 2003 New York Free Press

Authors
Yakovchenko, V., Morgan, T. R., Chinman, M. J., Powell, B. J., Gonzalez, R., Park, A., Malone, P. S., Chartier, M., Ross, D., & Rogal, S. S.
Affiliations
  • Center for Health Optimization and Implementation Research (US)
  • VA Long Beach Healthcare System (US)
  • RAND Corporation (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Veterans Health Administration (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Rogal, Shari S.
Venue
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2021-12
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
1348-1348
ISSN
1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200447147
Cited by
27
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 2
FWCI
6.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Implementation Research Institute
  • Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (PEC 19-307)
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (K12HS019461)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K23DA048182)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH113806)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatitis C virus research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Keywords
hepatitis C virus, HCV elimination, implementation strategies, Veterans Health Administration, learning collaborative, diffusion of innovations, early adopters, data warehousing, tailoring, champions
MeSH terms
Hepatitis C, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Veterans Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review