The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A resilient workforce: patient safety and the workforce response to a cyber-attack on the ICT systems of the national health service in Ireland
Published version of a preprint
Abstract
Background: In May 2021, the Irish public health service was the target of a cyber-attack. The response by the health service resulted in the widespread removal of access to ICT systems. While services including radiology, diagnostics, maternity, and oncology were prioritised for reinstatement, recovery efforts continued for over four months. This study describes the response of health service staff to the loss of ICT systems, and the risk mitigation measures introduced to safely continue health services. The resilience displayed by frontline staff whose rapid and innovative response ensured continuity of safe patient care is explored. Methods: To gain an in-depth understanding of staff experiences of the cyber-attack, eight focus groups (n = 36) were conducted. Participants from a diverse range of health services were recruited, including staff from radiology, pathology/laboratories, radiotherapy, maternity, primary care dental services, health and wellbeing, COVID testing, older person’s care, and disability services. Thematic Analysis was applied to the data to identify key themes. Results: The impact of the cyber-attack varied across services depending on the type of care being offered, the reliance on IT systems, and the extent of local IT support. Staff stepped-up to the challenges and quickly developed and implemented innovative solutions, exhibiting great resilience, teamwork and adaptability, with a sharp focus on ensuring patient safety. The cyber-attack resulted in a flattening of the healthcare hierarchy, with shared decision-making at local levels leading to an empowered frontline workforce. However, participants in this study felt the stress placed on staff by the attack was more severe than the cumulative effect of the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions: Limited contingencies within the health system IT infrastructure - what we call a lack of system resilience - was compensated for by a resilient workforce. Within the context of the prevailing COVID-19 pandemic, this was an enormous burden on a dedicated workforce. The adverse impact of this attack may have long-term and far-reaching consequences for staff wellbeing. Design and investment in a resilient health system must be prioritised.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“To give just one example, there is a growing threat that stems from cyber-attacks on organisations, with very real consequences for workers.”
From Reflecting on 40 Years of New Technology, Work and Employment: Insights From the Current Editors on the Past and Prospects for the Future (2026) · cites this paper as Moore et al. 2023
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- Iflaifel M, Lim RH, Ryan K, Crowley C. Resilient health care: a systematic review of conceptualisations, study methods and factors that develop resilience. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):1–21. · DOI
- Biddle L, Wahedi K, Bozorgmehr K. Health system resilience: a literature review of empirical research. Health Policy Plann. 2020;35(8):1084–109. · DOI · Paper page
- Blanchet K, James P. The role of social networks in the governance of health systems: the case of eye care systems in Ghana. Health Policy Plann. 2013;28(2):143–56. · DOI
- Kruk ME, Myers M, Varpilah ST, Dahn BT. What is a resilient health system? Lessons from Ebola. The Lancet. 2015;385(9980):1910–2. · DOI · Paper page
- Blanchet K, Nam SL, Ramalingam B, Pozo-Martin F. Governance and capacity to manage resilience of health systems: towards a new conceptual framework. Int J Health Policy Manage. 2017;6(8):431. · DOI · Paper page
- PwC. Conti cyber attack on the HSE: Independent Post Incident Review. 2021.
- Pranggono B, Arabo A. COVID-19 pandemic cybersecurity issues. Internet Technol Lett. 2021;4(2):e247. · DOI
- Muthuppalaniappan M, Stevenson K. Healthcare cyber-attacks and the COVID-19 pandemic: an urgent threat to global health. Int J Qual Health Care. 2021;33(1):mzaa117. · DOI
- Al-Qarni EA. Cybersecurity in Healthcare: a review of recent attacks and mitigation strategies. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl. 2023;14(5). · DOI
- Ramadan RA, Aboshosha BW, Alshudukhi JS, Alzahrani AJ, El-Sayed A, Dessouky MM. Cybersecurity and Countermeasures at the time of pandemic. J Adv Transp. 2021;2021:1–19. · DOI
- Argaw ST, Bempong N-E, Eshaya-Chauvin B, Flahault A. The state of research on cyberattacks against hospitals and available best practice recommendations: a scoping review. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak. 2019;19(1):1–11. · DOI · Paper page
- Ghafur S, Kristensen S, Honeyford K, Martin G, Darzi A, Aylin P. A retrospective impact analysis of the WannaCry cyberattack on the NHS. NPJ Digit Med. 2019;2(1):1–7. · DOI
- O’donovan R, Mcauliffe E. A systematic review of factors that enable psychological safety in healthcare teams. Int J Qual Health Care. 2020;32(4):240–50. · DOI · Paper page
- Forsgren L, Tediosi F, Blanchet K, Saulnier DD. Health systems resilience in practice: a scoping review to identify strategies for building resilience. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):1173. · DOI
- Morley L, Cashell A. Collaboration in health care. J Med Imaging Radiation Sci. 2017;48(2):207–16. · DOI · Paper page
- Rosen B, Preisman M, Read H, Chaukos D, Greenberg RA, Jeffs L, et al. Providers’ perspectives on implementing resilience coaching for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):1–10. · DOI
- Wiig S, Aase K, Billett S, Canfield C, Røise O, Njå O, et al. Defining the boundaries and operational concepts of resilience in the resilience in healthcare research program. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20:1–9. · DOI · Paper page
- Institute of Medicine. To Err is human: building a Safer Health System. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2000.
- Kruk ME, Ling EJ, Bitton A, Cammett M, Cavanaugh K, Chopra M et al. Building resilient health systems: a proposal for a resilience index. BMJ. 2017;357. · DOI · Paper page
- Barasa E, Mbau R, Gilson L. What is resilience and how can it be nurtured? A systematic review of empirical literature on organizational resilience. Int J Health Policy Manage. 2018;7(6):491. · DOI · Paper page
- Côté-Arsenault D, Morrison‐Beedy D. Maintaining your focus in focus groups: avoiding common mistakes. Res Nurs Health. 2005;28(2):172–9. · DOI
Cited by
Hodder, A., Valizade, D., Hardy, K., MacKenzie, R., & Smith, A. (2026) · New Technology, Work and Employment · doi:10.1111/ntwe.70054
Metadata
- Authors
- Moore, G., Khurshid, Z., McDonnell, T., Rogers, L., & Healy, O.
- Venue
- BMC Health Services Research
- Published
- 2023-10-17
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1472-6963
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Licence
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (tdm)
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (vor)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A resilient workforce: patient safety and the workforce response to a cyber-attack on the ICT systems of the national health service in Ireland. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12913-023-10076-8
- The paper
- Moore, G., Khurshid, Z., McDonnell, T., Rogers, L., & Healy, O. (2023). A resilient workforce: patient safety and the workforce response to a cyber-attack on the ICT systems of the national health service in Ireland. BMC Health Services Research. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10076-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
