How is autonomy supported for people with dementia living in a nursing home, to what extent and under what circumstances? A realist evaluation
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Background: Being autonomous is important for people with dementia living in nursing homes. Our recent realist review indicated that supporting their autonomy depends on various aspects. Objective: This study aimed to uncover how people with dementia, their family members and care and treatment professionals experience the support of autonomy in daily care practice: what works, to what extent and under what circumstances. Design: A realist evaluation was performed using qualitative methods. Methods: We applied a realist approach through interviews with family members and care and treatment professionals, as well as on-site observations: due to their cognitive condition we could not exchange mutual views with residents directly. We performed these interviews and observations on site to find out how, to what extent and under what circumstances, supporting autonomy interventions work in daily practice situations. Causal assumptions were derived from the empirical data, leading to Context (C) –Mechanism (M) – Outcome (O) configurations. Results: Data extraction from 24 interviews and 8 observations resulted in 19 CMO configurations on four themes: A. Autonomy and boundaries: providing maximum autonomy influenced by safety and health restrictions. B. Organization of daily care processes: the influence of attempting to increase efficiency by working routines. C. Team competences and collaboration: the possibilities of care professionals to acquire the relevant competences and an appropriate level of team collaboration. D. Interaction and relationships: the accomplishment of a working relationship between residents, their family and care and treatment professionals. Conclusion: The results showed that supporting autonomy was valued highly by all stakeholders. In streamlining care processes, working routines were influential to supporting autonomy. Weighing risky choices for people with dementia in their decision making was another factor. Our study indicated that realizing autonomy is facilitated by a capable and collaborative team of professionals and by a working relationship between persons living with dementia, family members and professionals.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Custers, A. F. J., Westerhof, G. J., Kuin, Y., Gerritsen, D. L., & Riksen-Walraven, J. M. (2012) · Journal of Aging Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2012.02.005 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Self-citationde Rooij, A. H. P. M., Luijkx, K. G., Schaafsma, J., Declercq, A. G., Emmerink, P. M. J., & Schols, J. M. G. A. (2012) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.02.007 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- van der Weide, H., Lovink, M. H., Luijkx, K. G., & Gerritsen, D. L.
- Affiliations
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- Tilburg University (NL)
- Venue
- BMC Health Services Research
- Published
- 2025-02-12
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 237-237
- ISSN
- 1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11817305
- OpenAlex
- W4407365721
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 3
- FWCI
- 9.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Research portal (Tilburg University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Archipel Zorggroep, Netherlands
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Patient Dignity and Privacy
- Keywords
- dementia, autonomy, nursing homes, long-term care, family members, care professionals, professional competence, team collaboration, work routines, decision-making, person-centred care, context-mechanism-outcome configurations
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dementia, Family, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Nursing Homes, Personal Autonomy, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
