Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 13

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Strategic planning and organizational performance in public health sector: a scoping review

Wongsin, Utoomporn, Pannoi, Tanavij, Prutipinyo, Chardsumon, Maruf, Mohammad Ainul, Pongpattrachai, Dichapong, Quansri, Orawan, Sattayasomboon, Youwanuch·2025·BMC Health Services Research
DOI 10.1186/s12913-025-13206-6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Strategic planning is a methodical approach to generate fundamental decisions and actions that influence and direct the nature, function, and rationale of the public health sector. However, the existing literature presents mixed findings. This study aims identify potential knowledge gaps and unexplored areas in strategic planning, organizational performance, and its relationship. METHODS: The scoping review was applied following PRISMA guidelines. A descriptive analysis was conducted to summarize key findings from studies focusing on strategic planning, organizational performance, and their relationship within the public health sector. Literature searches were conducted in the Scopus, EBCSO, and PubMed. Then, all retrieved articles, published between January 2015 and May 2024, were systematically reviewed. RESULTS: There were 16 studies that met the eligible criteria. Most articles focus on organizational performance in public health sectors followed by strategic planning and the relationship between strategic planning and organizational performance in the public health sector, accordingly. Most Studies showed that evaluation tools, supply chain management, transformative change, and strategic management are deemed for organizational development; and potential factors contributing to organizational performance were mainly human resource-related aspects. A confirmed relationship between strategic planning and organizational performance with mediators was presented. CONCLUSION: We conclude that strategic planning in public health involves carefully making important decisions and taking actions that define and direct the goals, activities, and purposes of the public health sector, while, it was an antecedence of public health sector performance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12913-025-13206-6

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Harrison JP. Essentials of strategic planning in healthcare. 3rd ed. Chicago: Health Academic Series; 2020.
  2. Aujirapongpan S, Meesuk K, Theinsathid P, Maneechot C. Performance evaluation of community hospitals in thailand: an analysis based on the balanced scorecard concept. Iran J Public Health. 2020;49:906–13.
  3. Khan R, Huda F. The impact of strategic management on the performance of health care organizations (A study of three selected tertiary health care center of karachi, Pakistan). Arab J Bus Manag Rev. 2016;6:1–4.

Metadata

Authors
Wongsin, U., Pannoi, T., Prutipinyo, C., Maruf, M. A., Pongpattrachai, D., Quansri, O., & Sattayasomboon, Y.
Venue
BMC Health Services Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2025-08-01
Volume
25
Issue
1
ISSN
1472-6963
DOI
10.1186/s12913-025-13206-6
Cited by
13
References
24
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.