Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 549

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The new field of ‘precision psychiatry’

Open access
Fernandes, Brisa S., Williams, Leanne M., Steiner, Johann, Leboyer, Marion, Carvalho, André F., Berk, Michael·2017·BMC Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Precision medicine is a new and important topic in psychiatry. Psychiatry has not yet benefited from the advanced diagnostic and therapeutic technologies that form an integral part of other clinical specialties. Thus, the vision of precision medicine as applied to psychiatry - 'precision psychiatry' - promises to be even more transformative than in other fields of medicine, which have already lessened the translational gap. DISCUSSION: Herein, we describe 'precision psychiatry' and how its several implications promise to transform the psychiatric landscape. We pay particular attention to biomarkers and to how the development of new technologies now makes their discovery possible and timely. The adoption of the term 'precision psychiatry' will help propel the field, since the current term 'precision medicine', as applied to psychiatry, is impractical and does not appropriately distinguish the field. Naming the field 'precision psychiatry' will help establish a stronger, unique identity to what promises to be the most important area in psychiatry in years to come. CONCLUSION: In summary, we provide a wide-angle lens overview of what this new field is, suggest how to propel the field forward, and provide a vision of the near future, with 'precision psychiatry' representing a paradigm shift that promises to change the landscape of how psychiatry is currently conceived.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12916-017-0849-x

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Toward Precision Medicine. Building a Knowledge Network for Biomedical Research and a New Taxonomy of Disease. National Research Council Committee on a Framework for Developing a New Taxonomy of Disease. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011.
  2. Bernard C. Introduction to Experimental Medicine. Chicago: McMillan and Co., Ltd.; 1827.
  3. Perlman RL, Govindaraju DR, Archibald E. Garrod: the father of precision medicine. Genet Med. 2016;18(11):1088–9. · doi:10.1038/gim.2016.5
  4. Tamminga CA. Approaching human neuroscience for disease understanding. World Psychiatry. 2014;13(1):41–3. · doi:10.1002/wps.20099
  5. Oxford Living Dictionaries. English. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/precision . Accessed 28 Mar 2017.
  6. Cohen WA. Drucker on Leadership: New Lessons from the Father of Modern Management. New York: Wiley; 2009.
  7. Biomarkers on a roll. Nature Biotechnology. 2010;28(5):431. · doi:10.1038/nbt0510-431

Cited by

See all 549

Metadata

Authors
Fernandes, B. S., Williams, L. M., Steiner, J., Leboyer, M., Carvalho, A. F., & Berk, M.
Venue
BMC Medicine
Published
2017-04-13
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
80-80
ISSN
1741-7015 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2606894917
Cited by
549
References
30
FWCI
293.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The new field of ‘precision psychiatry’. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12916-017-0849-x
The paper
Fernandes, B. S., Williams, L. M., Steiner, J., Leboyer, M., Carvalho, A. F., & Berk, M. (2017). The new field of ‘precision psychiatry’. BMC Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0849-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.