Use of precision cut lung slices as a translational model for the study of lung biology
Open accessAbstract
Animal models remain invaluable for study of respiratory diseases, however, translation of data generated in genetically homogeneous animals housed in a clean and well-controlled environment does not necessarily provide insight to the human disease situation. In vitro human systems such as air liquid interface (ALI) cultures and organ-on-a-chip models have attempted to bridge the divide between animal models and human patients. However, although 3D in nature, these models struggle to recreate the architecture and complex cellularity of the airways and parenchyma, and therefore cannot mimic the complex cell-cell interactions in the lung. To address this issue, lung slices have emerged as a useful ex vivo tool for studying the respiratory responses to inflammatory stimuli, infection, and novel drug compounds. This review covers the practicality of precision cut lung slice (PCLS) generation and benefits of this ex vivo culture system in modeling human lung biology and disease pathogenesis.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The main advantage of PCLS is that they faithfully recapitulate physiological cell diversity, ratio, and cell-cell and cell-environment interactions, in a manner that has been impossible to achieve so far in vitro.
“The main advantage of PCLS is that they faithfully recapitulate physiological cell diversity, ratio and cell-cell and cell-environment interactions, in a manner that has been impossible to achieve so far in vitro (Evans & Lee, 2020; Liu et al., 2019).”
From Pulmonary fibrosis: Emerging diagnostic and therapeutic strategies (2023) · cites this paper as Liu et al., 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 121 · Cited by 206
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [21]Stadie WC, Riggs BC. Microtome for preparation of tissue slices for metabolic studies in vitro. J Biol Chem. 1944;154:687–90.
- Authors
- Liu, G., Betts, C., Cunoosamy, D. M., Åberg, P. M., Hornberg, J. J., Sivars, K. B., & Cohen, T. S.
- Affiliations
- AstraZeneca (Sweden) (SE)
- AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB)
- AstraZeneca (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cohen, Taylor S.
- Venue
- Respiratory Research
- Published
- 2019-07-19
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 162-162
- ISSN
- 1465-9921 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-993X
- PMC
- PMC6642541
- OpenAlex
- W2963583927
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 121
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 19
- FWCI
- 4.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Respiratory Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
- Keywords
- precision-cut lung slices, lung biology, cell-cell interactions, inflammatory stimuli, pulmonary infection, drug testing, air-liquid interface culture, organ-on-a-chip
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Asthma, Humans, Lung, Organ Culture Techniques, Translational Research, Biomedical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review