Effects of supplementation with main coffee components including caffeine and/or chlorogenic acid on hepatic, metabolic, and inflammatory indices in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial
Open accessAbstract
Background: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is much more frequent and more severe, including cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with type 2 diabetes. Coffee is a complex beverage with hundreds of compounds whereas caffeine and chlorogenic acid are the most abundant bioactive compounds. The published epidemiological data demonstrating beneficial associations between all categories of coffee exposure and ranges of liver outcomes are rapidly growing; however, the main contributors and cause-effect relationships have not yet been elucidated. To address existing knowledge gaps, we sought to determine the efficacy and safety of 6 months chlorogenic acid and/or caffeine supplementation in patients with type 2 diabetes affected by NAFLD. Methods: This trial was carried out at two Diabetes Centers to assess the effects of supplementation with daily doses of 200 mg chlorogenic acid, 200 mg caffeine, 200 mg chlorogenic acid plus 200 mg caffeine or placebo (starch) in patients with type 2 diabetes and NAFLD. The primary endpoint was reduction of hepatic fat and stiffness measured by FibroScan, and changes in serum hepatic enzymes and cytokeratin − 18 (CK-18) levels. Secondary endpoints were improvements in metabolic (including fasting glucose, homeostasis model assessment-estimated insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), hemoglobin A1c (HBA1C), C-peptide, insulin and lipid profiles) and inflammatory (including nuclear factor k-B (NF-KB), tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α), high sensitive- C reactive protein(hs-CRP)) parameters from baseline to the end of treatment. Results: Neither chlorogenic acid nor caffeine was superior to placebo in attenuation of the hepatic fat and stiffness and other hepatic outcomes in patients with diabetes and NAFLD. Except for the lower level of total cholesterol in caffeine group (p = 0.04), and higher level of insulin in chlorogenic acid plus caffeine group (p = 0.01) compared with placebo, there were no significant differences among the treatment groups. Conclusion: These findings do not recommend caffeine and/or chlorogenic acid to treat NAFLD in type 2 diabetes patients. Trial registration: IRCT201707024010N21. Registered 14 September 2017.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Since observational studies are prone to unmeasured or residual confounding, and RCTs investigating the hepatic effects of coffee consumption are scarce and negative or inconclusive, no firm conclusions can be drawn.
“Since observational studies are prone to unmeasured or residual confounding, and RCTs investigating the hepatic effects of coffee consumption are scarce and negative or inconclusive, 343,344 no fi rm conclusions can be drawn.”
From EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). (2024) · cites this paper as [343]
The Introduction says observational coffee studies cannot establish causation and that randomized evidence for hepatoprotective benefits was lacking. The Results report no improvement in hepatic outcomes in this trial, but it tested caffeine and chlorogenic acid supplements in patients with NAFLD and type 2 diabetes—not coffee consumption itself. It therefore does not establish that RCTs of coffee consumption generally have negative or inconclusive hepatic results. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 98
- Authors
- Mansour, A., Mohajeri-Tehrani, M. R., Samadi, M., Qorbani, M., Merat, S., Adibi, H., Poustchi, H., & Hekmatdoost, A.
- Affiliations
- National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute (IR)
- Shariati Hospital (IR)
- Alborz University of Medical Sciences (IR)
- Digestive Disease Research Institute (IR)
- Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute (IR)
- Corresponding author
- Hekmatdoost, Azita
- Venue
- Nutrition Journal
- Published
- 2021-04-10
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 35-35
- ISSN
- 1475-2891 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8037901
- OpenAlex
- W3152522780
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 9.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nutrition Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Institute for Medical Research Developments
- National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
- Keywords
- non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, type 2 diabetes, caffeine, chlorogenic acid, hepatic steatosis, liver stiffness, insulin resistance, inflammation, liver enzymes, cytokeratin 18, lipid profile
- MeSH terms
- Caffeine, Chlorogenic Acid, Coffee, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Liver, Dietary Supplements, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review