Cancer prevalence among flight attendants compared to the general population
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Flight attendants are an understudied occupational group, despite undergoing a wide range of adverse job-related exposures, including to known carcinogens. In our study, we aimed to characterize the prevalence of cancer diagnoses among U.S. cabin crew relative to the general population. METHODS: In 2014-2015, we surveyed participants of the Harvard Flight Attendant Health Study. We compared the prevalence of their self-reported cancer diagnoses to a contemporaneous cohort in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 2013-2014) using age-weighted standardized prevalence ratios (SPRs). We also analyzed associations between job tenure and the prevalence of selected cancers, using logistic regression and adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: Compared to NHANES participants with a similar socioeconomic status (n = 2729), flight attendants (n = 5366) had a higher prevalence of every cancer we examined, especially breast cancer, melanoma, and non-melanoma skin cancer among females. SPR for these conditions were 1.51 (95% CI: 1.02, 2.24), 2.27 (95% CI: 1.27, 4.06), and 4.09 (95% CI: 2.70, 6.20), respectively. Job tenure was positively related to non-melanoma skin cancer among females, with borderline associations for melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancers among males. Consistent with previous studies, we observed associations between job tenure and breast cancer among women who had three or more children. CONCLUSIONS: We observed higher rates of specific cancers in flight attendants compared the general population, some of which were related to job tenure. Our results should be interpreted in light of self-reported health information and a cross-sectional study design. Future longitudinal studies should evaluate associations between specific exposures and cancers among cabin crew.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Female flight attendants have a higher prevalence of reproductive cancers, skin cancers and other conditions such as chronic bronchitis and heart disease.
“Female flight attendants also have a higher prevalence of reproductive cancers, skin cancers and other conditions such as chronic bronchitis and heart disease230,231”
From Rhythms of life: circadian disruption and brain disorders across the lifespan (2019) · cites this paper as [231]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 45
- Authors
- McNeely, E., Mordukhovich, I., Staffa, S., Tideman, S., Gale, S., & Coull, B.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mordukhovich, Irina
- Venue
- Environmental Health
- Published
- 2018-06-26
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-49
- ISSN
- 1476-069X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6019786
- OpenAlex
- W2806930696
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 1.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Environmental Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- FAMRI (CIA 150083)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Performance
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
- Keywords
- flight attendants, cancer prevalence, occupational cancer, breast cancer, melanoma, non-melanoma skin cancer, job tenure, carcinogens, NHANES comparison
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aerospace Medicine, Aviation, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Occupational Diseases, United States, Prevalence, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review