Cited by 45Global Cancer Incidence and ScreeningOccupational Health and PerformanceOccupational Health and Safety in Workplaces

Cancer prevalence among flight attendants compared to the general population

Open access
McNeely, Eileen, Mordukhovich, Irina, Staffa, Steven, Tideman, Samuel, Gale, Sara, Coull, Brent·2018·Environmental Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Flight attendants are an understudied occupational group, despite undergoing a wide range of adverse job-related exposures, including to known carcinogens. In our study, we aimed to characterize the prevalence of cancer diagnoses among U.S. cabin crew relative to the general population. METHODS: In 2014-2015, we surveyed participants of the Harvard Flight Attendant Health Study. We compared the prevalence of their self-reported cancer diagnoses to a contemporaneous cohort in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 2013-2014) using age-weighted standardized prevalence ratios (SPRs). We also analyzed associations between job tenure and the prevalence of selected cancers, using logistic regression and adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: Compared to NHANES participants with a similar socioeconomic status (n = 2729), flight attendants (n = 5366) had a higher prevalence of every cancer we examined, especially breast cancer, melanoma, and non-melanoma skin cancer among females. SPR for these conditions were 1.51 (95% CI: 1.02, 2.24), 2.27 (95% CI: 1.27, 4.06), and 4.09 (95% CI: 2.70, 6.20), respectively. Job tenure was positively related to non-melanoma skin cancer among females, with borderline associations for melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancers among males. Consistent with previous studies, we observed associations between job tenure and breast cancer among women who had three or more children. CONCLUSIONS: We observed higher rates of specific cancers in flight attendants compared the general population, some of which were related to job tenure. Our results should be interpreted in light of self-reported health information and a cross-sectional study design. Future longitudinal studies should evaluate associations between specific exposures and cancers among cabin crew.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12940-018-0396-8

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Female flight attendants have a higher prevalence of reproductive cancers, skin cancers and other conditions such as chronic bronchitis and heart disease.

    “Female flight attendants also have a higher prevalence of reproductive cancers, skin cancers and other conditions such as chronic bronchitis and heart disease230,231”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 45

Authors
McNeely, E., Mordukhovich, I., Staffa, S., Tideman, S., Gale, S., & Coull, B.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Mordukhovich, Irina
Venue
Environmental Health
Published
2018-06-26
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
49-49
ISSN
1476-069X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2806930696
Cited by
45
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
FAMRI (CIA 150083)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
Keywords
flight attendants, cancer prevalence, occupational cancer, breast cancer, melanoma, non-melanoma skin cancer, job tenure, carcinogens, NHANES comparison
MeSH terms
Adult, Aerospace Medicine, Aviation, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Occupational Diseases, United States, Prevalence, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review